Hello, I currently have an app that includes the Sign in with Apple feature, and I need to transfer this app to another app team. I have reviewed all official documentation but have not found the answer I need. My situation has some specificities, and I hope to receive assistance. The .p8 key created by the original developer team has been lost, and the app’s backend does not use a .p8 key for verification—instead, it verifies by obtaining Apple’s public key. However, according to the official documentation I reviewed, obtaining a transfer identifier during the app transfer process requires a client_secret generated from the original team’s .p8 key. This has left us facing a challenge, and we have two potential approaches to address this issue: Q1: During the transfer, is it possible to skip obtaining the transfer identifier and proceed directly with the app transfer, without performing any backend operations? Is this approach feasible? Q2: If the above approach is not feasible, should we cr
Search results for
Apple Maps Guides
149,446 results found
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
I am facing an issue while trying to staple a notarization ticket to my signed macOS installer package. Details of my setup: The .pkg file is signed using my Developer ID Installer certificate. The app inside the package is signed using my Developer ID Application certificate. Notarization via xcrun notarytool completes successfully with status: Accepted. However, the stapler command fails with the following error: xcrun stapler staple -v /Users/mac-test/Desktop/IPMPlus_Arm_Installer_signed.pkg Processing: /Users/mac-test/Desktop/IPMPlus_Arm_Installer_signed.pkg Could not validate ticket for /Users/mac-test/Desktop/IPMPlus_Arm_Installer_signed.pkg The staple and validate action failed! Error 65. I verified that all other Apple notarization-related servers (api.apple-cloudkit.com, gs.apple.com, ocsp.apple.com, ocsp2.apple.com, crl.apple.com, developer.apple.com) are reachable. However, the domain cdn-apple-cloudkit.apple.com cannot be resolved from any network, including mobile or public Wi-F
I'm a little surprised to find there is no token counter and I'm curious what drives the decision not to include it. As OP ~says, 4096 is not a massive context size. If tokens are a first-class constraint, a counter should be too. Catch an error and trim is wasteful. Apple should offer deterministic preflight.
Topic:
Machine Learning & AI
SubTopic:
Foundation Models
I am posting here to express my significant concern regarding the excessive time my Apple Developer Program account application has been held under review. It has now been over a month. This application is for a non-profit church service app. I have provided every single piece of documentation requested—and then some. It honestly feels like I've submitted enough information that if they asked for the original blueprint of the church building, I could hand that over too. The entire process is currently stalled, preventing a service-oriented application from being deployed and ultimately hindering our outreach efforts. Has anyone else experienced a review period this long for a clear-cut non-profit application? More directly, to the Apple Developer Team: What is the current expected timeframe for approval, and why is this particular application still pending after more than 30 days, despite comprehensive documentation? This delay is beyond frustrating and needs an immediate resolution.
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
Forums Feedback
Force Feedback
Accounts
App Store
📦 Package Contents This is a complete macOS/iOS port of REFIXXY with all Windows dependencies removed and replaced with macOS equivalents. What's Included ✅ Complete Python source code (macOS-compatible) ✅ macOS packaging scripts (py2app, DMG creation) ✅ Info.plist for app bundle ✅ Code signing scripts for Apple Developer ✅ Apple App Store submission guide ✅ Installation and testing instructions What You Need to Add ❌ FFmpeg binaries for macOS (download instructions below) ❌ Apple Developer Certificate (for code signing) ❌ Test on your Mac (cannot test on Windows) 🚀 Quick Start on Your Mac Step 1: Copy to Your Mac Copy this entire folder to your Mac via OneDrive Location: ~/Documents/REFIXXY-macOS/ Step 2: Install Dependencies # Install Homebrew (if not already installed) /bin/bash -c $(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Homebrew/install/HEAD/install.sh) # Install Python 3.11+ brew install python@3.11 # Install FFmpeg brew install ffmpeg # Install Python depende
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
General
Erro na App store persistente de preenchimento de senha , não conseguindo baixar app ou reinstalar app excluido
Problem Summary I'm experiencing a persistent invalid-credential error with Apple Sign-In on iOS despite having verified every aspect of the configuration over the past 6 months. The error occurs at the Firebase Authentication level after successfully receiving credentials from Apple. Error Message: Firebase auth error: invalid-credential - Invalid OAuth response from apple.com. Environment Platform: iOS (Flutter app) Firebase Auth: v5.7.0 Sign in with Apple: v6.1.2 Xcode: Latest version with capability enabled iOS Target: 13.0+ Bundle ID: com.harmonics.orakl What Actually Happens ✅ Apple Sign-In popup appears ✅ User can authenticate with Apple ID ✅ Apple returns credentials with identityToken ❌ Firebase rejects with invalid-credential error The error occurs at Firebase level, not Apple level. What I've Tried Created a brand new Apple Key (previous key was 6 months old) Tested with both App ID and Service ID in Firebase Completely reinsta
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
General
So, first off, there are two critical details I need to clarify: Note in MAC OS everything (same DExt and UserClient-code) works fine in the background and in the foreground. macOS doesn't implement any of the app suspension semantics iPadOS does, which means you can't really compare the behavior of the two systems. That leads to here: 1 variation A) UserClientApp has attribute [Background modes][Enable external communications]. The external-accessory background mode is totally unrelated to DriverKit and isn't actually doing anything in your app. It allows apps using the ExternalAccessory framework to communicate with their accessory in the background, but that framework (iOS 3.0) and the background mode (iOS 4.0) are MUCH older than DriverKit. Making this as explicit as possible: B) A way to pursue Apple-store to accept (without MFI) an UserClientApp with [Enable external communication]. ...adding external-accessory is not changing ANYTHING about how your app wakes/sleep in the background. You will
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Drivers
Tags:
Following up with this to clear up some odds and ends: Provisioning profile ... doesn't match the entitlements file's value for the ... userclient-access entitlement. One thing to be aware of her is that Xcode has a bias in the way it presents codesign errors where it assumes the Entitlement.plist is correct and the profile is wrong. However, in practice that's basically never the case with DriverKit entitlements and tends to lead to a lot of flailing trying to somehow fix the provisioning profile. This error ALWAYS means that the entitlement.plist doesn't match the profile. You fix that by: Changing the Entitlement.plist to match the profile. Changing the actual profile. That means either: Submitting a new request to correct any mistake (this case). IF you have been granted multiple instances of the same entitlement, then you switch to manual profile generation and manual codesigning. See this forum post for more details on that flow. However, the key here is to understand that this: ...our hypothesis is tha
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Drivers
Tags:
I've probably set the record for the most failed attempts to get my app approved. OK, so I've solved some more things, like straightening out my subscriptions and now, I can now sync my storekit2 developer settings with app connect for testing, and my manual file works as well. The part I don't get, is when I submit my app for approval, I'm told or read that I leave the Storekit file set to none, and Apple will work around that. On my last submission, since my code couldn't read the dev app store file because it was set to none, my code left the current view blank because I didn't write for that scenario, not really an oversight but more like a bad guess on how app store testing works. Today I wrote code to handle that scenario, to take it to my Paywall view, but without subscriptions since I can't load them without my dev StoreKit file. I replaced Subscriptions with a retry and reload button, and added a contact support link. Yes I'm frustrated, but still patient. I don't understand how my app can b
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
General
I’m looking for iOS and Apple Watch users to help beta test ChoreFit, a fitness app that transforms everyday chores into measurable workouts using NEAT (Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis) science. What it does: • Tracks chores like vacuuming, mopping, and laundry as real workouts • Syncs with Apple Health for steps, heart rate, and calories • Lets you start or pause chores right from your Apple Watch • Adjusts effort based on body weight and optional weighted vests What I need from testers: • Install via TestFlight (link provided once approved) • Use the app during normal household tasks • Share feedback on usability, Apple Watch sync, and calorie accuracy If you’re interested in movement tracking, fitness analytics, or wearable integration, I’d love your help validating and refining this app before public release.
If I fetch a library playlist like the generated Favorites playlist via MusicKit like this guard let initialTracks = try await playlist.with([.tracks]).tracks else { return nil } I get a list of tracks like this: ... TrackID: i.e5gmPS6rZ856 TrackID: i.4ZQMxU0OxNg0 TrackID: i.J198KH4P85K4 TrackID: i.J1AaRC4P85K4 TrackID: i.4BPqWt0OxNg0 TrackID: 4473570282773028026 TrackID: 4473570282773028025 TrackID: 4015088256684964387 TrackID: 4473570282773028024 TrackID: 7541557725362154249 TrackID: 4473570282773028027 I save the IDs for later use, but when I want to fetch them, only the ones with ids that starts with i. work. static func getLibrarySong(from id: String) async -> Song? { var request = MusicLibraryRequest() request.filter(matching: .id, equalTo: MusicItemID(id)) do { let response = try await request.response() return response.items.first } catch { ... } } Or the Apple Music API endpoint : static func getLibrarySongFromAPI(with id: String) async -> Song? { guard let url = AppleMusicURL.getURL(f
You should check with the support resources provided by the 3rd party to get assistance with their software. Do Rork.com has a support channel? Are you able to demonstrate the issue in a test project created from one of Xcode's templates, and using only Apple APIs? Unless another developer in the forums has experience with the third-party and can provide assistance. Albert Pascual
Worldwide Developer Relations.
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
General
I received this message when trying to submit a build using Rork.com. Can anyone tell me what this is and how to fix it? There is a problem with the request entity - You are not allowed to create 'iOS' profile with App ID 'XXXXXXXX'. ✖ Failed to create Apple provisioning profile Error: build command failed.
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
General
It’s very frustrating when in a feedback I specify that I cannot reliably reproduce it and the feedback gets closed with the message “Since this issue cannot be reproduced, this report has been closed”, e.g. FB18985938. Is Apple not interested in hearing about issues that cannot be reliably reproduced? Many issues unfortunately depend on a variety of factors and it’s often impossible for third-party developers or users to figure out how to reliably reproduce them. Usually these kind of issues get addressed by e.g. adding more logging so that the next time it happens it's easier to find out what's causing it. Then the last part of the message “Please file a new report with a sysdiagnose if you encounter this issue again” sounds like I’m being teased, because what use is a new sysdiagnose if I still cannot reproduce it reliably? It will just be closed like the last one. I created FB20595673 for this issue.