We use Transaction.currentEntitlements in StokeKit 2 to unlock functionality based on a Non-Consumable IAP but we have a case involving a refund that seems wrong and I am trying to understand the interation between transactionId, originalTransactionId & revocationReason. The Context: We have a universal App on macOS and iOS that offers a shared Non-Consumable IAP. For this example I have named it "app.lifetime" On macOS we use StoreKit 2 and I am calling the Transaction.currentEntitlements and Transaction.all functions. On iOS we are still using StoreKit 1. This example customer: Originally purchased "app.lifetime" on 2024-10-27 Was refunded by Apple for "app.lifetime" on 2024-10-29 Re-purchased "app.lifetime on 2025-02-24 (I have seen an email receipt of this transaction but it never shows up in Transaction data) (all the above happened on the mac via StoreKit 2) The Transactions (all lightly redacted for privacy): on macOS the following is returned from Transaction.currentEntitlements... { "appTransactionId" : "...8123", "bundleId" : "app", "currency" : "USD", "deviceVerification" : "...", "deviceVerificationNonce" : "...", "environment" : "Production", "inAppOwnershipType" : "PURCHASED", "originalPurchaseDate" : 1729997808000, "originalTransactionId" : "...9955", "price" : 1, "productId" : "app.lifetime", "purchaseDate" : 1729997808000, "quantity" : 1, "signedDate" : 1740416289102, "storefront" : "USA", "storefrontId" : "143441", "transactionId" : "...7511", "transactionReason" : "PURCHASE", "type" : "Non-Consumable" } Note in the above example the originalTransactionId & transactionId are different. Transaction.all however returns both transactions: [ { "appTransactionId" : "...8123", "bundleId" : "app", "currency" : "USD", "deviceVerification" : "...", "deviceVerificationNonce" : "...", "environment" : "Production", "inAppOwnershipType" : "PURCHASED", "originalPurchaseDate" : 1729997808000, "originalTransactionId" : "...9955", "price" : 1, "productId" : "app.lifetime", "purchaseDate" : 1729997808000, "quantity" : 1, "revocationDate" : 1730224102000, "revocationReason" : 0, "signedDate" : 1740415969925, "storefront" : "USA", "storefrontId" : "143441", "transactionId" : "...9955", "transactionReason" : "PURCHASE", "type" : "Non-Consumable" }, { "appTransactionId" : "...8123", "bundleId" : "app", "currency" : "USD", "deviceVerification" : "...", "deviceVerificationNonce" : "...", "environment" : "Production", "inAppOwnershipType" : "PURCHASED", "originalPurchaseDate" : 1729997808000, "originalTransactionId" : "...9955", "price" : 1, "productId" : "app.lifetime", "purchaseDate" : 1729997808000, "quantity" : 1, "signedDate" : 1740416289102, "storefront" : "USA", "storefrontId" : "143441", "transactionId" : "...7511", "transactionReason" : "PURCHASE", "type" : "Non-Consumable" } ] Note here that the original transaction ("...9955") includes a revocationDate and revocationReason that match the expected refund but the secondary transaction that seems to match on all other details is missing the revocation info. Looking at the iOS SK1 receipt data to compare, after a receipt refresh I see only a single transaction "...9955" which includes the cancellation info and transaction "...7511" is not present at all. The impact of this is that on iOS we are considering the purchase void but on macOS we are following currentEntitlements and consdering it still valid. Calling the inApps/v1/history/... server API with the "...7511" transactionId that is shown in the currentEntitlements response returns the "...9955" transaction with the correct revocation status but "...7511" is no returned at all. To Summarise: currentEntitlements on macOS shows transaction "...7511" as active and with an originalTransactionId of "...9955" all on macOS includes both "...7511" as active and "...9955" as revoked iOS reciept data shows only "...9955" as revoked Server API shows only "...9955" as revoked event when explicitly called with "...7511" Neither of them show a more recent purchase the same customer made for the same IAP product. My questions are: Is this a StoreKit bug or am I mis-understanding something? If it's a bug how can I work around it to ensure revoked purchases aren't still appearing in currentEntitlements? Under what conditions can StoreKit generate multiple transactionIds for the same underlying originalTransactionId? I had assumed (and the docs suggest) this only happens for subscriptions but here it is happening for a Non-Consumable IAP. Why would transactionId "...7511" only be present on macOS/SK2 and not visible at all on iOS/SK1 or API? I don't understand why the latest IAP from 2025-02-24 that the customer assures me they made (and has shown me the receipt for is not showing up in the Transactions history at all. Any ideas?

When I quit the app from the background task list, CLLocationUpdate.liveUpdates does not resume properly and start location updates. However, if I kill the app directly, it can recover and start location updates.

where can we find documentation on the following fields included in payloads? They're not listed alongside the other fields in the documentation linked below: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/weatherkitrestapi/hourweatherconditions precipitationIntensity snowfallAmount Or if we can get the data type, unit used, and description here that would be great

I am developing a parental control app using Apple’s Screen Time API and FamilyControls Framework. My goal is to allow parents to remotely block apps on their child’s device from their own phone. Anyone have any idea how can i do that?

I am wondering wether iOS allow apps to detect users' proxy.

Is there any way I can get updates when I change CarPlay style settings? I've tried CPSessionConfigurationDelegate.contentStyleChanged and CPTemplateApplicationSceneDelegate.contentStyleDidChange, but they always produce the same result. When I choose: Automatic -> I receive light in case of daylight; Always Dark and Always Show Dark Map toggle on -> dark Always Dark and Always Show Dark Map toggle off -> light. But it seems to be wrong, b/c CarPlay's toolbar is still dark, and I receive light. Is there a way to get a dark style when choosing Always Dark and Always Show Dark Map toggle off? Or at least get updates when the Always Show Dark Map toggle changes?

I noticed the time sensitive entitlement says it's only for iOS and macOS. But without the entitlement, the time sensitive toggle doesn't show in my app's notification settings on visionOS. When I archive my visionOS app for App Store Connect, the entitlement seems to be taken out as it doesn't show in my entitlement list for the build in App Store Connect. I'm confused at this point if the entitlement is really necessary, since it seems to be needed to debug on the simulator at least. I don't have a physical device to test it on unfortunately.

I'm using the NEHotspostConfigurationManager to join the WiFi network of a configured accessory. While this is all nice and dandy, I wonder why I'm still connected to said WiFi when I (force-)close the app. Wouldn't it be more useful to reconnect to the last network before?

I have an app that I'm using for my own purposes and is not in the app store. I would like to run an http server in the background for more than the allotted 3 minutes to allow persistent communications with a connected Bluetooth device. The Bluetooth device would poll the service at intervals. Is this possible to do? This app does not need app store approval since it's only for personal use.

Hi, In my application I am donating AppIntent instances that I have to the system using the donate() API. I recently came across this article that talks about deleting donations but it does not mention how to handle AppIntent instances. I am wondering when working with dynamic AppIntents (with different properties that can change in the future), should I be worried about "outdated" donated AppIntent instances? And if yes how can I delete previously donated AppIntent instances.

Please allow me to confirm the Server Notifications V2 specification. I am aware that if withdrawal an Apple account that has a subscription, the subscription will eventually be cancelled. Regarding Server Notifications V2 notifications with a notificationType of EXPIRED, am I correct in thinking that they will be sent when the subscription expires even if the Apple account is withdrawal?

My application advertises service uuid FC66 and 00410b66-2553-48d7-cf18-000000002154 in advertising data, and "loading" as local name in response data in foreground. But iOS cut local name to "loadi" and add Hashed UUID data 0100000000000000000000000600000000 to response data. Why iOS add hashed uuid data? Is it because my 128-bit uuid format is wrong? We want to advertise the complete local name data. How to avoid this problem?

Hello Apple Developers, I’m developing an iOS app that requires access to the user’s contacts. I understand that starting from iOS 14, Apple introduced two levels of contact permissions: 1️⃣ Full Access – The app can read all contacts. 2️⃣ Limited Access – The app can only access contacts selected by the user. My Question: If a user initially grants Limited Access, is it allowed by Apple’s guidelines to request Full Access later? 🔹 I understand that re-requesting permission immediately after the user denies it is against Apple’s policies. 🔹 However, if the user has already granted Limited Access, and we first show an explanation modal explaining why Full Access is beneficial, can we then prompt them to change their settings via openAppSettings()? 🔹 Alternatively, can we use Permission.contacts.request() again to re-prompt the user for Full Access, or will iOS prevent the permission prompt from appearing again? How We Handle This in the App: 1️⃣ If a user selects Limited Access, we respect their choice and only access their selected contacts. 2️⃣ Later, if Full Access is necessary for an enhanced experience, we display a clear explanation modal explaining why the app needs Full Access. 3️⃣ If the user agrees, we attempt to guide them to openAppSettings(), allowing them to manually change the permission. 4️⃣ However, if Permission.contacts.request() can be used to directly request Full Access again, we would like to know if this is acceptable. We want to ensure that our implementation follows Apple’s privacy guidelines while providing the best user experience. Any official guidance or best practices on this matter would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance!

Howdy! I'm in the R&D phase of this project and I need help. I can't find any sources that verify what I want to do is even possible. I need to connect an iPhone or iPad using a USB cord to an external device which will transfer files to the iPhone or iPad. I have an app already made which can organize the files and whatever else I need to do (app is from a similar project). I'll refer to this device as Alfred (for poops and giggles) The plan (if possible) is for Alfred to recognize my app and use its documents folder as the destination of the transfer. The iDevice doesn't have to communicate with Alfred, but that would be a bonus. I don't want Alfred to run on an SOC. My goal is to have it be as simple as possible. No OS, just firmware. If the only way to interact with Apple Devices is Bluetooth or Wifi than so be it. If Matter or Thread could be utilized I wouldn't be apposed. Any help with this project would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Does anyone have this error and my app can't be searched in the Apple Store

I use Homepod Mini as the gateway and have bound 9 Matter lights and 7 Matter switches. Each of my switches has 12 buttons, and each button supports three functions: single click, double click, and long press. Therefore, a total of 252 actions can be configured for 7 * 12 * 3. Currently, a total of 71 actions are configured for the 7 Matter switches. When configuring the 72nd action, the app will prompt that the operation cannot be completed. But if you delete a few previously configured actions, such as 68 actions, then you can configure 3 more actions (69, 70, 71). However, as long as you configure the 72nd action, the app will prompt that the operation cannot be completed, as if the available space is occupied. What is the reason for this?

My question is simple, I do not have much experience in writing swift code, I am only doing it to create a small executable that I can call from my python application which completes Subcription Management. I was hoping someone with more experience could point out my flaws along with giving me tips on how to verify that the check is working for my applicaiton. Any inight is appreciated, thank you. import Foundation import StoreKit class SubscriptionValidator { static func getReceiptURL() -> URL? { guard let appStoreReceiptURL = Bundle.main.appStoreReceiptURL else { print("No receipt found.") return nil } return appStoreReceiptURL } static func validateReceipt() -> Bool { guard let receiptURL = getReceiptURL(), let receiptData = try? Data(contentsOf: receiptURL) else { print("Could not read receipt.") return false } let receiptString = receiptData.base64EncodedString() let validationResult = sendReceiptToApple(receiptString: receiptString) return validationResult } static func sendReceiptToApple(receiptString: String) -> Bool { let isSandbox = Bundle.main.appStoreReceiptURL?.lastPathComponent == "sandboxReceipt" let urlString = isSandbox ? "https://sandbox.itunes.apple.com/verifyReceipt" : "https://buy.itunes.apple.com/verifyReceipt" let url = URL(string: urlString)! let requestData: [String: Any] = [ "receipt-data": receiptString, "password": "0b7f88907b77443997838c72be52f5fc" ] guard let requestBody = try? JSONSerialization.data(withJSONObject: requestData) else { print("Error creating request body.") return false } var request = URLRequest(url: url) request.httpMethod = "POST" request.httpBody = requestBody request.setValue("application/json", forHTTPHeaderField: "Content-Type") let semaphore = DispatchSemaphore(value: 0) var isValid = false let task = URLSession.shared.dataTask(with: request) { data, response, error in guard let data = data, error == nil, let jsonResponse = try? JSONSerialization.jsonObject(with: data) as? [String: Any], let status = jsonResponse["status"] as? Int else { print("Receipt validation failed.") semaphore.signal() return } if status == 0, let receipt = jsonResponse["receipt"] as? [String: Any], let inApp = receipt["in_app"] as? [[String: Any]] { for purchase in inApp { if let expiresDateMS = purchase["expires_date_ms"] as? String, let expiresDate = Double(expiresDateMS) { let expiryDate = Date(timeIntervalSince1970: expiresDate / 1000.0) if expiryDate > Date() { isValid = true } } } } semaphore.signal() } task.resume() semaphore.wait() return isValid } }

I've successfully started the Live Caller ID Lookup example and initialized the PIRService. I added several identities to the input.txtpb file, some with block: true and others with block: false. Here is the file but modified phone digits: identities { key: "+40790123123" value { name: "Blocking 1" cache_expiry_minutes: 7 block: true } } identities { key: "+972526111111" value { name: "Blocking 2" cache_expiry_minutes: 7 block: true } } identities { key: "+123" value { name: "Adam" cache_expiry_minutes: 8 block: false category: IDENTITY_CATEGORY_PERSON } } identities { key: "+972526111112" value { name: "Identified Business Name 1" cache_expiry_minutes: 1 block: false category: IDENTITY_CATEGORY_BUSINESS } } identities { key: "+972526111113" value { name: "Identified Business Name 2" cache_expiry_minutes: 1 block: false category: IDENTITY_CATEGORY_BUSINESS } } The main issue is that only the number marked as +40790123123 was actually blocked, while "Blocking 2" appeared as identified contacts with their assigned name displayed. Notably, the only blocked number was a foreign number with a different country code than the number being called. The other numbers belonged to the same country. Can someone clarify whether this is a bug in the example project or an issue with the data file?

I am working on Flutter MAC app. And using ObjectBox store DB for local data saving. When i am setting Sandbox - NO, It is working fine. But when i am setting Sandbox - YES for production MAC flutter app - It is giving error and getting black screen only Getting error- Error initializing ObjectBox store: StorageException: failed to create store: Could not open database environment; please check options and file system (1: Operation not permitted) (OBX_ERROR code 10199)

I'm experiencing a crash during a lightweight Core Data migration when a widget that accesses the same database is installed. The migration fails with the following error: CoreData: error: addPersistentStoreWithType:configuration:URL:options:error: returned error NSCocoaErrorDomain (134100) error: userInfo: CoreData: error: userInfo: error: metadata : { NSPersistenceFrameworkVersion = 1414; NSStoreModelVersionChecksumKey = "dY78fBnnOm7gYtb+QT14GVGuEmVlvFSYrb9lWAOMCTs="; NSStoreModelVersionHashes = { Entity1 = { ... }; Entity2 = { ... }; Entity3 = { ... }; Entity4 = { ... }; Entity5 = { ... }; }; NSStoreModelVersionHashesDigest = "aOalpc6zSzr/VpduXuWLT8MLQFxSY4kHlBo/nuX0TVQ/EZ+MJ8ye76KYeSfmZStM38VkyeyiIPf4XHQTMZiH5g=="; NSStoreModelVersionHashesVersion = 3; NSStoreModelVersionIdentifiers = ( "" ); NSStoreType = SQLite; NSStoreUUID = "9AAA7AB7-18D4-4DE4-9B54-893D08FA7FC4"; "_NSAutoVacuumLevel" = 2; } The issue occurs only when the widget is installed. If I remove the widget’s access to the Core Data store, the migration completes successfully. The crash happens only once—after the app is restarted, everything works fine. This occurs even though I'm using lightweight migration, which should not require manual intervention. My suspicion is that simultaneous access to the Core Data store by both the main app and the widget during migration might be causing the issue. Has anyone encountered a similar issue? Is there a recommended way to ensure safe migration while still allowing the widget to access Core Data? Any insights or recommendations would be greatly appreciated.