[Submitted as FB14860454, but posting here since I rarely get responses in Feedback Assistant] In a simple SwiftData app that adds items to a list, memory usage drastically increases as items are added. After a few hundred items, the UI lags and becomes unusable. In comparison, a similar app built with CoreData shows only a slight memory increase in the same scenario and does NOT lag, even past 1,000 items. In the SwiftData version, as each batch is added, memory spikes the same amount…or even increases! In the CoreData version, the increase with each batch gets smaller and smaller, so the memory curve levels off. My Question Are there any ways to improve the performance of adding items in SwiftData, or is it just not ready for prime time? Example Projects Here are the test projects on GitHub if you want to check it out yourself: PerfSwiftData PerfCoreData

A Mac Catalyst App Creates an AppKit Bundle Plugin in which @available does not work。 In AppKit Bundle Plugin, there is not watchOS and iOS version can not be higher than 28, but the log has been output. if (@available(watchOS 18.0, *)) { NSLog(@"bundle is available watchOS"); } if (@available(iOS 28.0, *)) { NSLog(@"bundle is available iOS"); } demo link: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1s_5qmsL6Bh-df3A1PfD0OA Extracted code: 5ndj

I hav the 16 Pro Max running 18.1. My facebook, TikTok and other apps seem to not have sound when I get their notification, my phone settings is always anable with sound, apps also enable with sound, please any suggestions

I have created swift command line project and i have added logic to executing apple script using NSAppleScript. That will launch Microsoft Excel file I am launching this swift command line executable from java using process launch. 3)This is not prompting me. It is throwing exception "Not authorized to send Apple events to Microsoft Excel." I have already tried out this option Added info.plist with NSAppleEventsUsageDescription Added entitlement with com.apple.security.automation.apple-events to true In packages i have selected this entitlement i have select the bundle identifier , team and signing certificate "Development" and automatically manage signing. can you please suggest what could i missed ?

Under iOS18.1 and Xcode 16.1, use Matter and MatterSupport to pair Matter devices. It was found that Matter over WIFI devices could not trigger the PASE process let device = try deviceController? .deviceBeingCommissioned(withNodeID: commissioningDeviceID) After some time: func controller(_: MTRDeviceController, statusUpdate status: MTRCommissioningStatus) Return failure Device logs: E (47956) chip[ZCL]: Commissioning window is currently not open I (48789) chip[EM]: <<< [E:17954r S:13425 M:26847390 (Ack:206367876)] (S) Msg TX to 1:00000000EE53575F [AE90] [UDP:[FE80::148F:AC68:D736:CA5C%st1]:58332] --- Type 0001:09 (IM:InvokeCommandResponse) E (48798) chip[DL]: Long dispatch time: 867 ms, for event type 3 I (48804) chip[EM]: >>> [E:17954r S:13425 M:206367876 (Ack:26847387)] (S) Msg RX from 1:00000000EE53575F [AE90] --- Type 0001:08 (IM:InvokeCommandRequest) I (48819) chip[EM]: <<< [E:17954r S:13425 M:26847391 (Ack:206367876)] (S) Msg TX to 1:00000000EE53575F [AE90] [UDP:[FE80::148F:AC68:D736:CA5C%st1]:58332] --- Type 0000:10 (SecureChannel:StandaloneAck) I (48838) chip[EM]: >>> [E:17954r S:13425 M:206367876 (Ack:26847387)] (S) Msg RX from 1:00000000EE53575F [AE90] --- Type 0001:08 (IM:InvokeCommandRequest) I (48851) chip[EM]: <<< [E:17954r S:13425 M:26847392 (Ack:206367876)] (S) Msg TX to 1:00000000EE53575F [AE90] [UDP:[FE80::148F:AC68:D736:CA5C%st1]:58332] --- Type 0000:10 (SecureChannel:StandaloneAck) I (48935) chip[EM]: >>> [E:17954r S:13425 M:206367877 (Ack:26847390)] (S) Msg RX from 1:00000000EE53575F [AE90] --- Type 0000:10 (SecureChannel:StandaloneAck) I (48952) chip[EM]: >>> [E:17955r S:13425 M:206367878] (S) Msg RX from 1:00000000EE53575F [AE90] --- Type 0001:0a (IM:TimedRequest) I (48957) chip[EM]: <<< [E:17955r S:13425 M:26847393 (Ack:206367878)] (S) Msg TX to 1:00000000EE53575F [AE90] [UDP:[FE80::148F:AC68:D736:CA5C%st1]:58332] --- Type 0001:01 (IM:StatusResponse) I (48998) chip[EM]: >>> [E:17955r S:13425 M:206367879 (Ack:26847393)] (S) Msg RX from 1:00000000EE53575F [AE90] --- Type 0001:08 (IM:InvokeCommandRequest) I (49019) esp_matter_command: Received command 0x00000000 for endpoint 0x0000's cluster 0x0000003C I (49019) chip[ZCL]: Received command to open commissioning window I (49025) chip[DIS]: Updating services using commissioning mode 2 I (49087) chip[DIS]: CHIP minimal mDNS started advertising. I (49093) chip[DIS]: Advertise operational node 752B90252951AE90-000000005B4AA994 I (49094) chip[DIS]: CHIP minimal mDNS configured as 'Operational device'; instance name: 752B90252951AE90-000000005B4AA994. I (49105) chip[DIS]: mDNS service published: _matter._tcp I (49109) chip[DIS]: Advertise commission parameter vendorID=5493 productID=8228 discriminator=0741/02 cm=2 I (49120) chip[DIS]: CHIP minimal mDNS configured as 'Commissionable node device'; instance name: 1D59D05DF5376A3B. I (49137) chip[DIS]: mDNS service published: _matterc._udp I (49137) chip[ZCL]: Commissioning window is now open I (49143) chip[EM]: <<< [E:17955r S:13425 M:26847394 (Ack:206367879)] (S) Msg TX to 1:00000000EE53575F [AE90] [UDP:[FE80::148F:AC68:D736:CA5C%st1]:58332] --- Type 0001:09 (IM:InvokeCommandResponse) I (49161) app_main: Commissioning window opened I (49200) chip[EM]: >>> [E:17955r S:13425 M:206367880 (Ack:26847394)] (S) Msg RX from 1:00000000EE53575F [AE90] --- Type 0000:10 (SecureChannel:StandaloneAck) I (69380) SENSOR: Temp: 236 I (69383) ACInterface: AC event ntc :236

I'm working on a network extension that provides a VPN tunnel. The logic behind the tunnel provider requires me to connect the backend to pull recent configuration and then configure the routing. It works in general but fails with some circumstances. I have 100% reproducible fails if I run OpenVPN tunnel in parallel. When it happens it looks like the network extension cannot connect the backend (any internet resource actually). Requests fail by timeout. To troubleshoot this situations I've added NWPathMonitor at my NEPacketTunnelProvider subclass: pathMonitor?.pathUpdateHandler = { path in logger.info("Path update: \(path)") logger.info(" : \(path.availableInterfaces)") } On successful scenarios I observed logs: 14:53:19:829 Starting VPN tunnel... 14:53:19:895 Path update: satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: en0[802.11], scoped, ipv4, ipv6, dns, uses wifi 14:53:19:899 : [en0] 14:53:22:237 Path update: satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: en0[802.11], scoped, ipv4, ipv6, dns, uses wifi 14:53:22:253 : [en0, utun12] 14:53:22:325 VPN tunnel is started. But if I start another tunnel first using OpenVPN (it's our corporate VPN) I observe failures with such log messages: 14:54:26:113 Starting VPN tunnel... 14:54:26:140 Path update: satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: en0[802.11], scoped, ipv4, ipv6, dns, uses wifi 14:54:26:141 : [en0] 14:55:28:259 Failed to start VPN tunnel. utun12 that was used by the extension in case of success is now occupied by the OpenVPN tunnel. The system creates utun13 for me but it feels like its misconfigured: > ifconfig (omitted most of the output) utun12: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 172.28.11.236 --> 172.28.10.1 netmask 0xfffffe00 nd6 options=201<PERFORMNUD,DAD> utun13: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 options=6460<TSO4,TSO6,CHANNEL_IO,PARTIAL_CSUM,ZEROINVERT_CSUM> Is it a system bug and what else can I do to diagnose the root cause of these failures?

There is no Network Extension icon missing in System Settings. Sequoia 15.1 (24B83) Screenshot attached

My test was conducted by changing the pink dice to have a 16 bit UUID using the ASKSampleAccessory app. Afterwards, I ran AccessorySetupKit Picker in the ASKSample app, but Pink dice was not found. We confirmed that Pink dice was searched well in other apps. Does AccessorySetupKit not support 16 bit UUID? AccessorySetupKit Sample code : https://developer.apple.com/documentation/AccessorySetupKit/authorizing-a-bluetooth-accessory-to-share-a-dice-roll

Hi I have some problems with my macOS after updating to Sonoma. I am running a intel based MacBookPro 2018. After update to Sonoma I had some Kernel panic. Log attached. Also I had some problems running my LaunchDaemon for starting macFUSE and connecting to SSHFS. This used to work before. Now, my plan forward is to restore a backup from the MacBook before update. I will restore the backup and remove any redundant/not in use .plist jobs ( especially ) LaunchDaemon jobs. When this is done I will try to update macOS again. I have many .plist jobs also Daemon. Please supply information on how I can remove any redundant / not in use .plist jobs. I belive the reason for the kernel panic was the io.macfuse.filesystems.macfuse.23 4.7.2. ( attached log ) I want to keep the io.macfuse.filesystems.macfuse.23 4.7.2 , but I want to remove other kexts not in use and other .plist not in use. Please supply info in how to identify redundant kexts not in use and redundant .plist not in use. How do I know if the induvidual kexts is needed or not ? Best regards Tormod Willassen Kernel_Panic.rtf log-file log-file

Hi everyone, I was just wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction on how to properly handle inquiries about refunding in-app purchases. I've seen multiple posts saying to direct them to Apple's support, but is there no other direct way of handling this? Also, does Apple not provide an API to interface with so you can issue refunds on behalf of the customer? Thanks.

we could see that could see that test cards are available for adding Debit/Credit Cards to Apple Wallet. https://developer.apple.com/apple-pay/sandbox-testing/ However, we are unable to find a way to add balance to Apple Cash in sandbox environment.

It is not possible to establish a point-to-point WiFi connection between iPhone models 15 and 16 (iOS 18) and the HiFlying HF-LPB100-1 module used by our IoT devices to control Yale locks: https://www.yaleconnecthub.com/en/compatible-products/hub The message displayed on the iPhone WiFi network settings screen when selecting the HF-LPB100-1 module network states 'Unable to connect'. It is important to highlight that all iPhone models and previous OS versions are compatible with this WiFi module (antenna + chipset). We already made a post in the Feedback Assistence platform FB15809338 (Provisioning an IoT devise under iOS 18 - Wi-Fi incompatibility ) STEPS TO REPRODUCE Plug in the Yale Connect Hub model YALE-4971 (with HF-LPB100-1 module) > The device's WiFi module will start reporting its network. On an iPhone 15 or 16 -using iOS 18 - display the WiFi network configuration screen and select Yale´s device network (it is named Yale-xxxxxx). Select the Yale network for the iPhone to connect point-to-point. An error message will appear: Unable to connect.

Currently, I have an app running locally on my computer, and there is also a web app. To create an account, users need to pay through the web app, which handles the payment process smoothly. My question is: Do I need to implement In-App Purchases (IAP) if the payment is only for account creation? Let me elaborate on my question. I know the typical answer is yes, but what if users in the mobile app cannot create an account or pay within the app itself? Instead, account creation is only possible via the web app, and only users who have paid outside the mobile platform can access and join the mobile app. This approach is similar to what Netflix and Spotify do – they do not allow account creation inside their mobile apps and do not provide any redirects or buttons indicating alternative payment methods (they do not have IAP).

I'm developing a Raycast extension that using Apple MusicKit API, is it safe to store developer tokens in Raycast extensions?

I have been using the basic NSPersistentContainer with 100k+ records for a while now with no issues. The database size can fluctuate a bit but on average it takes up about 22mb on device. When I switch the container to NSPersistentCloudKitContainer, I see a massive increase in size to ~150mb initially. As the sync engine uploads records to iCloud it has ballooned to over 600mb on device. On top of that, the user's iCloud usage in settings reports that it takes up 1.7gb in the cloud. I understand new tables are added and history tracking is enabled but the size increase seems a bit drastic. I'm not sure how we got from 22mb to 1.7gb with the exact same data. A few other things that are important to note: I import all the 100k+ records at once when testing the different containers. At the time of the initial import there is only 1 relation (an import group record) that all the records are attached to. I save the background context only once after all the records and the import group have been made and added to the context. After the initial import, some of these records may have a few new relations added to them over time. I suppose this could be causing some of the size increase, but its only about 20,000 records that are updated. None of the records include files/ large binary data. Most of the attributes are encrypted. I'm syncing to the dev iCloud environment. When I do make a change to a single attribute in a record, CloudKit reports that every attribute has been modified (not sure if this is normal or not ) Also, When syncing to a new device, the sync can take hours - days. I'm guessing it's having to sync both the new records and the changes, but it exponentially gets slower as more records are downloaded. The console will show syncing activity, but new records are being added at a slower rate as more records are added. After about 50k records, it grinds to a halt and while the console still shows sync activity, only about 100 records are added every hour. All this to say i'm very confused where these issues are coming from. I'm sure its a combination of how i've setup my code and the vast record count, record history, etc. If anyone has any ideas it would be much appreciated.

I need to decode a Base64-encoded receipt from an In-App Purchase and extract the transaction ID from it. However, I want to avoid using the verifyReceipt endpoint since it is deprecated. Can anyone guide me on how to achieve this manually? Are there any specific libraries, steps, or code samples I should follow to parse the receipt data and retrieve the transaction ID? Any help or insights would be greatly appreciated!

func handle(intent: INSendPaymentIntent, completion: @escaping (INSendPaymentIntentResponse) -> Void) { if let _ = intent.payee, let currencyAmount = intent.currencyAmount { let userActivity = NSUserActivity(activityType: "com.rapipay.nye.test.failure") userActivity.userInfo = ["amount": Int(truncating: currencyAmount.amount!)] completion(INSendPaymentIntentResponse(code: .failureRequiringAppLaunch, userActivity: userActivity )) return } } func application(_ application: UIApplication, continue userActivity: NSUserActivity, restorationHandler: @escaping ([any UIUserActivityRestoring]?) -> Void) -> Bool { print("ddddd") return true } this code is perfectly working on simulator and even i fi user userActivity as nil, continue userActivity is called, but on device it is not called Siri is working, asking for name and amount and handler is also called and opens app but does not pass intent or userActivity

Anne has two phone numbers, work and personal. Beth saved both phone numbers for Anne under one contact profile. When Beth sends a text to Anne's work phone, it is received on Anne's personal phone instead. We have verified only one phone number is set up under Messages settings, signed out of messages, restarted the phones. Any other fixes or suggestions?

After adding a pass to the wallet and setting the relevantDate, it doesn't show a notification on the screen after the relevantDate has passed. How do we test the wallet notification for a pass?

Is it possible to reset SwiftData to a state identical to that of a newly installed app? I have experienced some migration issues where, when I add a new model, I need to reinstall the entire application for the ModelContainer creation to work. Deleting all existing models does not seem to make any difference. A potential solution I currently have, which appears to work but feels quite hacky, is as follows: let _ = try! ModelContainer() modelContainer = try! ModelContainer(for: Student.self, ...) This seems to force out this error CoreData: error: Error: Persistent History (66) has to be truncated due to the following entities being removed: (...) which seems to reset SwiftData. Any other suggestions?