Demystify code signing and its importance in app development. Get help troubleshooting code signing issues and ensure your app is properly signed for distribution.

All subtopics

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

MSB6006 codesign exited with code
I've developed a mobile app in Visual Studio 2022 on Windows 11 on the MAUI platform. I'm Pair to a remote Mac machine to test/debug on an iOS Simulator. I was previously able to test on the remote mac machine simulator with not problems. I added some features including Geolocation and now I get the following error: error MSB6006: "codesign" exited with code 3. These are the last few lines in the Output window: 1> [xma][info]: Starting remote task execution for 'TriStar.Mobile.DriverPortal': Xamarin.MacDev.Tasks.CodesignVerify 1> [xma][info]: Sending Request Xamarin.Messaging.Build.Contracts.ExecuteTaskMessage to topic xvs/build/17.2.8053/execute-task/TriStar.Mobile.DriverPortal/8f2f6e4002fCodesignVerify 1> [xma][info]: Received Response of Xamarin.Messaging.Build.Contracts.ExecuteTaskMessage to topic build2424827232benbl/+/xvs/build/17.2.8053/execute-task/TriStar.Mobile.DriverPortal/8f2f6e4002fCodesignVerify 1> CodesignVerify: 2024-05-31T17:36:08.1417751-05:00 - Logging messages 1> Environment Variables passed to tool: 1> CODESIGN_ALLOCATE=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/codesign_allocate 1> /usr/bin/codesign --verify -vvvv "-R=anchor apple generic and certificate 1[field.1.2.840.113635.100.6.2.1] exists and (certificate leaf[field.1.2.840.113635.100.6.1.2] exists or certificate leaf[field.1.2.840.113635.100.6.1.4] exists)" bin/Debug/net8.0-ios/iossimulator-arm64//TriStar.Mobile.DriverPortal.app 1> bin/Debug/net8.0-ios/iossimulator-arm64//TriStar.Mobile.DriverPortal.app: valid on disk 1> bin/Debug/net8.0-ios/iossimulator-arm64//TriStar.Mobile.DriverPortal.app: satisfies its Designated Requirement 1> test-requirement: code failed to satisfy specified code requirement(s) 1> C:\Program Files\dotnet\packs\Microsoft.iOS.Sdk\17.2.8053\tools\msbuild\iOS\Xamarin.Shared.targets(2059,3): error MSB6006: "codesign" exited with code 3. Is there a problem or conflict with my entitlements? <dict>       <key>com.apple.security.app-sandbox</key>       <true/>       <key>com.apple.security.network.client</key>       <true/> </dict> The remote Mac is a Mac-In-Cloud running xCode 15.3 and Visual Studio 2022. My dev machine is running Windows 11 and VS 2022 In my Windows VS MAUI project I have <PropertyGroup Condition="'$(TargetFramework)'=='net8.0-ios'"> <EnableCodeSigning>true</EnableCodeSigning> <CodesignKey>Apple Development: BENJAMIN BLA... (7AGK....)</CodesignKey> <ProvisioningType>automatic</ProvisioningType> <CodesignProvision>VS: com.tristarfreightsys.driverportal Development</CodesignProvision> </PropertyGroup> VS: com.tristarfreightsys.driverportal Development is the Provisioning Profile automatically generated by VS. My Development Certiifcate and Distrubution Cert are in the Mac Keychain and in my VS
0
0
16
2h
Conflict between capability User Assigned Device Name & Contacts notes entitlements
We have requested an additional capability called "User Assigned Device Name" for my application to Apple and got approved the same on for debug/adhoc/release environments . Since then we are facing issues on code signing. We are always getting the compiler error "* Provisioning profile "xxxxxxxxxxx" doesn't support the User Assigned Device Name capability." on both Debug and Release environment. There is another capability "contacts notes entitlements" that we got approved long back when it was not apart of Apple ID(additional capabilities) rather we got approved as a part of our provisioning profile. Suppose we removed "contacts notes entitlements" from the profile and deleted it from the entitlement folder the project compiled without any error. So we are strongly believes the conflicts on the "contacts notes entitlements" is the root cause. We are about to release the version and which is blocked due to this error. So kindly look in to this issue and do the needful asap. STEPS TO REPRODUCE Added user assigned device name capability from Signing & Capability Tab in project in settings. Added the team, valid provisioning profiles and try to sign in manually. Getting the error “Provisioning profile xxxxxxxxxxxx" doesn't support the User Assigned Device Name capability." Note: Already got approval for the “user assigned device name” . Which is listed under the app id.
11
0
256
1w
Building the camera extension using CMake
Hello, I referred to the official camera extension example at https://developer.apple.com/documentation/coremediaio/creating_a_camera_extension_with_core_media_i_o?language=objc. I'm using CMake to build the camera extension plugin and integrate it into a Qt CMake project. When installing the system extension file, I receive a failure prompt with the following message: Error Domain=OSSystemExtensionErrorDomain Code=8 "Invalid code signature or missing entitlements" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Invalid code signature or missing entitlements} Here are the entitlements files for the camera extension: &lt;?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?&gt; &lt;!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC \"-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN\" \"http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd\"&gt; &lt;plist version=\"1.0\"&gt; &lt;dict&gt; &lt;key&gt;com.apple.security.app-sandbox&lt;/key&gt; &lt;true/&gt; &lt;key&gt;com.apple.security.application-groups&lt;/key&gt; &lt;array&gt; &lt;string&gt;com.yealink.meeting.app&lt;/string&gt; &lt;/array&gt; &lt;/dict&gt; &lt;/plist&gt; The info.List.in file for the camera extension: &lt;?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?&gt; &lt;!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC \"-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN\" \"http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd\"&gt; &lt;plist version=\"1.0\"&gt; &lt;dict&gt; &lt;key&gt;CMIOExtension&lt;/key&gt; &lt;dict&gt; &lt;key&gt;CMIOExtensionMachServiceName&lt;/key&gt; &lt;string&gt;$(TeamIdentifierPrefix)$(PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER)&lt;/string&gt; &lt;/dict&gt; &lt;/dict&gt; &lt;/plist&gt; And the entitlements file for the app: &lt;?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?&gt; &lt;!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC \"-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN\" \"http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd\"&gt; &lt;plist version=\"1.0\"&gt; &lt;dict&gt; &lt;key&gt;com.apple.developer.system-extension.install&lt;/key&gt; &lt;true/&gt; &lt;key&gt;com.apple.security.app-sandbox&lt;/key&gt; &lt;true/&gt; &lt;key&gt;com.apple.security.application-groups&lt;/key&gt; &lt;array&gt; &lt;string&gt;com.yealink.meeting.app&lt;/string&gt; &lt;/array&gt; &lt;key&gt;com.apple.security.device.camera&lt;/key&gt; &lt;true/&gt; &lt;key&gt;com.apple.security.device.microphone&lt;/key&gt; &lt;true/&gt; &lt;key&gt;com.apple.security.device.usb&lt;/key&gt; &lt;true/&gt; &lt;key&gt;com.apple.security.network.client&lt;/key&gt; &lt;true/&gt; &lt;key&gt;com.apple.security.network.server&lt;/key&gt; &lt;true/&gt; &lt;key&gt;com.apple.security.personal-information.location&lt;/key&gt; &lt;true/&gt; &lt;/dict&gt; &lt;/plist&gt; I'm looking forward to your response.
1
0
77
1d
Tap to Pay Entitlement only for development
Hi, We applied for Tap to Pay on iPhone entitlement and were approved, but on distribution support it's only showing Development. We can build and debug Tap to Pay on development, but unable to build release. We opened ticket with Apple support but they were saying it was configured correctly. I attached screenshot of our developer account entitlement for Tap to Pay. It clearly said Development only.
3
1
430
Oct ’23
Notarization submissions stuck on 'In Progress'
Good day, I'm trying to get my app notarized, so I can distribute it, but my submissions get stuck on 'In Progess'. On the 20th of June I made several submissions which seems to have disappeared. When I do 'xcrun notarytool history' they are not there anymore. On the 21th Of June I made 2 new submission attempts with ids d68ca68e-ddfb-42c2-a491-0b24ac6efdc2 and 5f0118c9-0edd-4213-827b-a2ff53e40f27, which had been running for several hours last time I checked on the the 21th, but have also disappeared over the weekend from my history. I checked the app with the steps described here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/security/notarizing_macos_software_before_distribution/resolving_common_notarization_issues, but all the checks were fine. Since there is no error message or log, I have no clue why my submissions get stuck on 'In Progress' or disappear. I've just submitted a new attempt with id 23a39a69-79a8-435c-a500-17ce1422c1fc and again it's stuck. Can anybody give any assistance?
0
0
58
1d
codesign py2app bundle format unrecognized, invalid, or unsuitable
Error code 1 "bundle format unrecognized, invalid, or unsuitable" Yea, I'm trying to codesign a python app which has been bundled with py2app, but without success. The codesign process logs a whole bunch of files with the above error. def sign_file(file_path, certificate_common_name, hardened_runtime=False): sign_command = [ "codesign", "-s", certificate_common_name, "--force", "--timestamp", "-v", file_path ] if hardened_runtime: sign_command.append("--options=runtime") success, message = run_command(sign_command) there are literally hundreds of files that fail, and the path may look something like this; code/dist/Impulse.app/Contents/Resources/lib/python3.10/plotly/validators/splom/marker: Needless to say that notorization returns "failed" Any help would be greatly appreciated. Steven
4
0
126
6d
My ID has been changed.
I got into trouble setting up my X-Code team ID. My user ID suddenly changed. Please take a look at the first screenshot. This is the certificate I was originally using, and I got a new certificate because it's about to expire. The new certificate is the second screenshot. But you can check that the ID is different. The problem is that the Apple login function is not working properly because the ID is different (I'm using Unity to develop a game) Can you tell me why the user ID has changed and I can't change it to the original one?
0
0
62
1d
Adding different capabilities to a Distribution profile for visionOS and iOS app
I have an app that runs on both iOS and visionOS (native). Both app use the same project, just some files and code segments are different. We do not use automatic signing. Instead we use a Distribution profile. When creating a distribution profile and adding capabilities there are certain capabilities we are using on iOS that are not available on visionOS. Like the com.apple.developer.kernel.increased-memory-limit and the Extended Virtual Addressing Entitlement. My understanding is that we can only have one Distribution profile per app (may be wrong understanding). My question is how can we have two separate distribution profiles for iOS and visionOS, so iOS can have those extra capabilities that aren't available on visionOS? I tried to create two separate targets, one for iOS and one for visionOS, but that still gives me the same issue of having the distribution profile being the same and not being able to make it unique for iOS and visionOS. Is there a correct approach to setting up the Xcode project or the distribution profile? I'm new to visionOS development and distribution profiles, any guidance would be appreciated. Let me know if you have any questions or need more clarification.
0
0
143
4d
error: exportArchive: "Runner.app" requires a provisioning profile with the Associated Domains and Push Notifications features.
When I build with Flutter, XCODE returns an error:error: exportArchive: "Runner.app" requires a provisioning profile with the Associated Domains and Push Notifications features. I use the automatic management signing, and the provisioning profiles include related features. What should I do?
2
0
170
1w
Gatekeeper blocks command line tool after signing and notarization
I have signed and notarized a single executable file command line tool developed outside Xcode, and distributed outside of the App store by way of a download from a website as follows below, but nevertheless gatekeeper blocks running the tool with the usual message, just like without signing or notarization. If I remove the com.apple.quarantine xattr, the tool runs as it should without gatekeeper interference, as expected. I have browsed countless posts here, with similar issues, but in the end I can't find what's wrong with the process. From what I gather, as long as the target Mac is connected to the Internet, stapling should not be required (I do understand I can't staple a single file executable command line tool), although Gatekeeper would be expected to complain in the case of the first run being done without Internet connection. The certificate is a "Developer Id Application" certificate, installed and valid on the machine doing the signing. It is unclear to me what the distinction is between "Developer Id Application" and "Developer Id Installer" certificates, but it's confusing that using -t install with spctl will actually accept the app. The app is open source and available on GitHub (although the full distribution packaging is done in a separate build environment with some additional logic). The app used below as the target for signing and notarization is available to download from https://www.axantum.com/ in a .tar.gz archive. Here follows a log of commands and output: XecretsCli.plist: (This was necessary to add to the signing to avoid corruption of the executable by the code signing) codesign -s GCXRMT5SQC -f --timestamp -s 0CF6800E595AA6DE9EBB905066619A9BFDD17A77 --entitlements XecretsCli.plist -o runtime XecretsCli codesign -d -vvv --entitlements :- XecretsCli Executable=/Users/svante/Downloads/XecretsCli-Osx-2.3.567 3/XecretsCli Identifier=XecretsCli Format=Mach-O thin (x86_64) CodeDirectory v=20500 size=271478 flags=0x10000(runtime) hashes=8473+7 location=embedded Hash type=sha256 size=32 CandidateCDHash sha256=d3a8216fcb22b4a4af7bd0157ecc3d2b6be9f9b2 CandidateCDHashFull sha256=d3a8216fcb22b4a4af7bd0157ecc3d2b6be9f9b20c9e3c17e107f08c7ae75c5a Hash choices=sha256 CMSDigest=d3a8216fcb22b4a4af7bd0157ecc3d2b6be9f9b20c9e3c17e107f08c7ae75c5a CMSDigestType=2 CDHash=d3a8216fcb22b4a4af7bd0157ecc3d2b6be9f9b2 Signature size=8987 Authority=Developer ID Application: Axantum Software AB (GCXRMT5SQC) Authority=Developer ID Certification Authority Authority=Apple Root CA Timestamp=Jun 20, 2024 at 13:26:05 Info.plist=not bound TeamIdentifier=GCXRMT5SQC Runtime Version=13.1.0 Sealed Resources=none Internal requirements count=1 size=172 Warning: Specifying ':' in the path is deprecated and will not work in a future release codesign -v -vvv --strict --deep XecretsCli XecretsCli: valid on disk XecretsCli: satisfies its Designated Requirement zip XecretsCli.zip XecretsCli adding: XecretsCli (deflated 63%) xcrun notarytool submit "XecretsCli.zip" --keychain-profile "Notarize" --wait Conducting pre-submission checks for XecretsCli.zip and initiating connection to the Apple notary service... Submission ID received id: e5990902-3101-42de-a1a6-b9ea40b944b8 Upload progress: 100.00% (12.4 MB of 12.4 MB) Successfully uploaded file id: e5990902-3101-42de-a1a6-b9ea40b944b8 path: /Users/svante/Downloads/XecretsCli-Osx-2.3.567 3/XecretsCli.zip Waiting for processing to complete. Current status: Accepted........ Processing complete id: e5990902-3101-42de-a1a6-b9ea40b944b8 status: Accepted spctl -a -vvv XecretsCli XecretsCli: rejected (the code is valid but does not seem to be an app) origin=Developer ID Application: Axantum Software AB (GCXRMT5SQC) spctl -a -vvv -t install XecretsCli XecretsCli: accepted source=Notarized Developer ID origin=Developer ID Application: Axantum Software AB (GCXRMT5SQC) Trying to run the executable: "XecretsCli" can't be opened because the identity of the developer cannot be confirmed. Your security preferences allow installation of only apps from the App Store and identified developers. Chrome downloaded this file today at 10:37. OK
3
0
193
5d
Attempted to install a Beta profile without the proper entitlement
We're seeing an issue where our app builds that previously were working suddenly started failing to install through TestFlight. When the user hits Update in TestFlight, they get an error message "The profile can't be installed. Try again.". Double checked the certificates and provisioning profiles, rebuilt and deployed the app, still same issue. We subsequently tried side loading the ipa file using XCode hoping for more detail. The install failed there as well, with the following error message: "Attempted to install a Beta profile without the proper entitlement." Seems like a good lead but haven't found much. Our provisioning profiles have the "beta-reports-active: true" entitlement and anyway haven't changed since it was working previously. Any idea what could be going on here? Here's the full error from XCode: Error installing 'APP.ipa', ERROR: Error Domain=com.apple.dt.CoreDeviceError Code=3002 "Failed to install the app on the device." UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Failed to install the app on the device., NSURL=file:///APP.ipa, NSUnderlyingError=0x60000372ea00 {Error Domain=IXUserPresentableErrorDomain Code=14 "Unable to Install “APP”" UserInfo={NSUnderlyingError=0x60000372e5e0 {Error Domain=MIInstallerErrorDomain Code=13 "Failed to install embedded profile for com.domain.app : 0xe800801f (Attempted to install a Beta profile without the proper entitlement.)" UserInfo={FunctionName=-[MIInstallableBundle _installEmbeddedProfilesWithError:], LegacyErrorString=ApplicationVerificationFailed, SourceFileLine=308, LibMISErrorNumber=-402620385, NSLocalizedDescription=Failed to install embedded profile for com.domain.app : 0xe800801f (Attempted to install a Beta profile without the proper entitlement.)}}, NSLocalizedDescription=Unable to Install “APP”, NSLocalizedRecoverySuggestion=Failed to install embedded profile for com.domain.app : 0xe800801f (Attempted to install a Beta profile without the proper entitlement.), NSLocalizedFailureReason=This app cannot be installed because its integrity could not be verified.}}} Domain: com.apple.dt.DVTCoreDevice Code: -1 User Info: { DVTErrorCreationDateKey = "2024-06-19 19:40:04 +0000"; } -- System Information macOS Version 14.2.1 (Build 23C71) Xcode 15.2 (22503) (Build 15C500b) Timestamp: 2024-06-19T14:40:04-05:00
1
1
309
6d
codesign errSecInternalComponent
I encountered a signature issue, codesign -f -s "Developer ID Application: ***" /Users/leagsoft/Desktop/uninstall /Users/leagsoft/Desktop/uninstall: replacing existing signature Warning: unable to build chain to self-signed root for signer "Developer ID Application:***" /Users/uninstall: errSecInternalComponent but using Sodu can sign normally
1
0
112
1w
Lock icon not visible in .pkg installer
Summary We have a .net 8 application that consists of 2 components, a GUI app and a launch daemon. The .pkg file for the GUI app is created by Visual Studio, and this .pkg is then bundled with the launch daemon into one installer using the packagesbuild utility. The problem we're facing is that our customer's MDM system is refusing to install the app because of a missing lock icon in the installer, which makes it look as if the app was not signed even though it is (shown on the right in the image below). Installer package contents The .pkg file created by packagesbuild contains the GUI app .pkg file shown on the left in the image above, signing of this file is handled by the .net build process. It also contains two third party .dylib files (one for intel, the other for arm), which are re-signed with the following command: codesign --sign "Developer ID Application: [...]" \ --force --options runtime --no-strict \ "<file-path>" The launch daemon is build with .net and then signed using this command: codesign --sign "Developer ID Application: [...]" \ --force --options runtime --no-strict \ --entitlements "<entitlements-path>" \ "<file-path>" I don't know if it's relevant, but there are also several .plist and .json files. Final package signing The .pkg file created by packagesbuild is signed using: productsign --sign "Developer ID Installer: [...]" \ --cert "Developer ID Installer: [...]" \ "com.optimidoc.cloudclient.pkg" \ "com.optimidoc.cloudclientsigned.pkg" After signing, the package is notarised with xcrun notarytool. Both the signing and notarisation finish without error, which I've validated by running pkgutil --check-signature "<file-path>" Package "com.optimidoc.cloudclientsigned.pkg": Status: signed by a developer certificate issued by Apple for distribution Notarization: trusted by the Apple notary service Signed with a trusted timestamp on: 2024-06-13 11:41:57 +0000 Certificate Chain: 1. Developer ID Installer: OptimiDoc s.r.o. (2YMBVCM8TM) Expires: 2028-03-01 07:37:30 +0000 SHA256 Fingerprint: 02 E2 C1 A0 06 E1 C1 A2 FF 70 BD CD A5 47 43 B2 DB CF 62 BB 6D D4 90 69 3E 7C C8 A7 29 73 7D 69 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2. Developer ID Certification Authority Expires: 2031-09-17 00:00:00 +0000 SHA256 Fingerprint: F1 6C D3 C5 4C 7F 83 CE A4 BF 1A 3E 6A 08 19 C8 AA A8 E4 A1 52 8F D1 44 71 5F 35 06 43 D2 DF 3A ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3. Apple Root CA Expires: 2035-02-09 21:40:36 +0000 SHA256 Fingerprint: B0 B1 73 0E CB C7 FF 45 05 14 2C 49 F1 29 5E 6E DA 6B CA ED 7E 2C 68 C5 BE 91 B5 A1 10 01 F0 24 What I've tried I played around with the signing process for a few days but I was unable to figure out where the installer UI gets the certificate information from. I've tried limiting the files included in the final .pkg file. First I tried only including the GUI app .pkg with a known good signature. I also tried only including the launch daemon executables. All to no avail. In regard to the packagesbuild utility, I noticed the --identity option, but at the moment I'm stuck with an "unknown error" message: The command is: packagesbuild "com.optimidoc.cloudclient.pkgproj" -v \ --identity "Developer ID Installer: [...]" \ --keychain "/Library/Keychains/System.keychain" And the output I get is: Building Project (11:56:49) at path: [...] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Build Folder (done) Package "com.optimidoc.cloudclient" Payload Assemble file hierarchy (done) Split forks (done) Create bill of material (done) Create pax archive (done) Scripts Assemble file hierarchy (done) Split forks (done) Create pax archive (done) PackageInfo (done) Create xar archive ============================================================================== ERROR: Description: Unknow Error ============================================================================== Build Failed I think the --identity option is the way forward, but I don't know how to debug the "unknown error" message. I've sunk a few days into this problem already, so any help would be greatly appreciated. I'll update the post if I have any news.
2
0
128
6d
App sandbox not enabled.
App sandbox not enabled. The following executables must include the "com.apple.security.app-sandbox" entitlement with a Boolean value of true in the entitlements property list: [( "com.xx.pkg/Payload/xx.app//Contents/Resources/ss-local", "ccom.xx.pkg/Payload/xx.app//Contents/Resources/v2ray-plugin" )] Refer to App Sandbox page at https://developer.apple.com/documentation/security/app_sandbox for more information on sandboxing your app. (ID: ca7d4fde-0f0d-4a71-9eee-a01692797549)
2
0
151
1w
Notarisation failing with “The signature of the binary is invalid"
Error: { “logFormatVersion”: 1, “jobId”: “1654af2a-ff0e-46ff-8839-5c374e63228b”, “status”: “Invalid”, “statusSummary”: “Archive contains critical validation errors”, “statusCode”: 4000, “archiveFilename”: “LocalApp-macosx.zip”, “uploadDate”: “2024-06-12T05:33:53.719Z”, “sha256”: “28ffff0e2c33b2f57a9f1c25677e84232bfa04b1ef5341130afbbf18093ba0ab”, “ticketContents”: null, “issues”: [ { “severity”: “error”, “code”: null, “path”: “LocalApp-macosx.zip/LocalApp-macosx.app/Contents/Resources/Java/Disk1/InstData/Resource1.zip/$BUILD_ROOT$/Desktop/collaborator.app_zg_ia_sf.jar/Contents/MacOS/applet”, “message”: “The signature of the binary is invalid.”, “docUrl”: "“Resolving common notarization issues | Apple Developer Documentation ", “architecture”: “i386” }, { “severity”: “error”, “code”: null, “path”: “LocalApp-macosx.zip/LocalApp-macosx.app/Contents/Resources/Java/Disk1/InstData/Resource1.zip/$BUILD_ROOT$/Desktop/collaborator.app_zg_ia_sf.jar/Contents/MacOS/applet”, “message”: “The signature of the binary is invalid.”, “docUrl”: ““Resolving common notarization issues | Apple Developer Documentation”, “architecture”: “x86_64” } ] } Why is the binary regarded as invalid and what remedy is recommended?
1
0
134
1w
Add permissions for private entitlement
I have a pretty simply macOS application which I've just been trying to fix since a long time ago. It's origin is really old, using the apple 802.11 framework located in /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/Apple80211.framework/Versions/Current/Apple80211 and it's supposed to just scan the area and display information about the local networks nearby. For some reason when I run the application and press the button to scan for local networks (wifi scan) It errors out and in the Xcode console I get Process WiFiInfo is missing entitlement required for Wi-Fi user-client access: &amp;lt;key&amp;gt;com.apple.private.driverkit.driver-access&amp;lt;/key&amp;gt; &amp;lt;string&amp;gt;com.apple.private.wifi.driverkit&amp;lt;/string&amp;gt; If I add those two lines to the entitlements, Xcode fails to sign my application and fails to build and run Provisioning profile "Mac Team Provisioning Profile: com.troger.WiFiInfo" doesn't include the com.apple.private.driverkit.driver-access entitlement. Any way I can fix this? I would really like to get this application back up to its running state as it once was before but am completely lost on how to fix this
2
0
157
2w