4.3

I've used PyInstaller to create an arm mach-o of a hello world python file. I then tried to sign the file using codesign and got the following error: language main executable failed strict validation When I create an x86_64 mach-o using the same method the codesign works without any issues. I'm using an arm64 only python 3.9 and PyInstaller version 4.3 I've tried codesigning on both M1 and intel, and codesigning a hello world compiled from C file with gcc works. Also, I've tried looking at the file compiled with PyInstaller using otool and haven't seen any issues.

I have an Application in Flutter that receives data from an API on Laravel, and I tried to upload my Application to an App Store and Apple informed me that since I offer Login with Facebook and Google, I also need to offer Login with Apple. So, we tried to implement the login with Apple ID, but we couldn't because of the Laravel version. Our application needs the API on Laravel 5.8, PHP 7.1, Socialite 4.3+. And apple requires a newer version of Laravel and PHP, so we are unable to continue. Can someone help me how to proceed in this case?

Hello we have developed our app after years of hard work and managed somehow to make payment for the apple developer program After multiple reviews from the past 2 months, Apple is still rejecting our app stating 4.3 reason design spam as they already host many dating apps We can understand that the app can be sometimes similar but our app has some very unique features which no other app offers in the market. We have tried changing the design layout adding removing features but still, apple rejected our app we haven't use the app to sexualize in any way, it's just a normal app as it is already live in numerous app stores and can be accessed on any device through a browser it makes no sense for the rejection of the app, our users are always asking when are we going live on the apple app store Any help from you all is highly appreciable we have already tried the app review board still in vain many apps with a very simple design and the same concept were accepted recently which makes me think about what

I have read the disconnected documentation for adding a simple complication that ONLY launches my app using the asset images I've created in various sizes for various families along with the ComplicationController code, but the complications never appear (with no errors). I would like to support Watch Series 1 with OS 4.3 on up. There never seems to be one place where this simple, default function is documented. What are the steps and code required to just launch a Watch app from a complication?

According to Apple's new policy ( https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=84w3e5bm ) - bug fixes will no longer be delayed over guideline violations except for those related to legal issues. You’ll instead be able to address guideline violations in your next submission.. In 2019 updates to my apps were rejected due to apple Guidelines (note - not safety, not legal - guidelines) violation 4.3 - smap (I have only few of them and they are NOT reskins - they do share similar functionality, though not the same, and different graphics - they are similar only in a way any match 3 is similar to each other). A week ago I wanted to publish and update (SDK update and bugfixed, not gameplay or etc) again, and was still rejected - though obviously it should be allowed. Correct me if I am wrong or misunderstood the sentence from the top of my post. Otherwise whom do I contact to change my reviewer for the one that follows rules? Thank you

Hi, I've built my own Collaboration/Messenger App based on Rocket.Chat from the open source, bound to my server and necessary to receive push notifications from my server. My app was refused today with: Guideline 4.3 - Design We noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam. The next submission of this app may require a longer review time, and this app will not be eligible for an expedited review until this issue is resolved. Guideline 4.2 - Design - Minimum Functionality We found that the usefulness of your app is limited because it seems to be intended for a small, or niche, set of users. I'm pretty puzzled. Regarding 4.2, how should I deploy an app to potential 250 users of my sports club if not via the AppStore. This is not a company where BusinessManager etc. can be used, I have no control over any devices. But finally 4.3 ... what I read my understanding of Spam i

my app was creating problem with deseign spam but somehow i managed to make it work and get accepted by apple store but now while updating it, it still showing same issue 4.3 spam I am totally ****** off and losing hope for my business, can anybody have any solution

My app rejected in from apple side. How can I solve this issue? Guideline 3.2 - Business During our review, we found that this app was designed for a specific business or organization, including its partners, clients or employees, and not for general distribution on the App Store. Business apps available on the App Store are meant for use by a wide variety of external customers around the world. As this app is not intended for general distribution, it cannot be made available on the App Store. We encourage you to review the other ways to distribute your business app and choose one that better meets your business needs. If you revise your app concept and features to provide substantial value to a wide variety of external customers around the world, we recommend that you also review our App Store Review Guidelines, including, among others, guidelines 2.5.4 - Background Location, 3.2.2 - Unacceptable Business Models, 4.0 - Design, 4.2 - Minimum Functionality, and 4.3 - Spam, prior to resubmitting the ap

Hi, we submitted our app for review after 1 year of development, and 4 months waiting to finally make payment and enable developer account. After review, app was rejected for 4.3 reason design spam as there are already lots of dating apps in the store reason. We have a unique audience and features (of course also common features like other dating as cannot be avoided chat, some like function etc), and a lof of users were looking forward to our ios version, they are still using the web and ask us every day when they can use ios app. App got rejected and what is unfair is that we can mention at least 5 apps that are total trash in terms of features that do exist in app store same category and are our rivals published without any problem. We submitted after 2 weeks a totally new concept for the app, new menus, animations etc to make it more unique so is not anymore under design spam. Now it was rejected again for same reason and we are out of ideas what to change for the next submission. Our designers a

Dating app removed for 4.3 design spam. What would be the easiest way to get approved again?