Search results for

“4.3”

624 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to Can SAAS-developed template apps pass the review and be published?
Appstore Guideline 4.3 may forbid you to do so. And here are some advices on how to handle it. 4.3 Spam Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase. https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/
Aug ’23
Unlisted app and SPAM 4.3 rejection
Hello, I would like to know, in case you received a rejection for SPAM 4.3 because there are similar apps on the app store if asking for the app to be released unlisted would solve the problem, as it would not be listed in the app store and would not cause confusion to users. Also the app in question is quite a niche app and it would be enough to distribute it via a link from our website. The app is free. Thank you.
1
0
547
Aug ’23
Reply to My App Rejected 4.3 Design: Spam
We have been developing a new app for scanning documents and photos for six months. This app has many unique features that other apps don't have. The app automatically detects holes on the documents that have been punched with a hole punch and removes them from the document. The corners of the detected document are automatically moved inwards to get clean edges, the user can set how many pixels to indented. This app recognises the text very accurately and inserts it into the PDF document behind the image at the exact position and text size as the text on the image. The PDF generated by the app can be searched for text and the text can be marked and copied. Another important feature that no other app in the App Store offers is the function that all four corners of the document are shown enlarged in four circles and are visible at the same time. The user can see immediately if the corners have been recognized satisfactorily or if they should be corrected. The user can move the corners either on the document or
Jun ’23
Reply to My App Rejected 4.3 Design: Spam
At WWDC 2023 I updated my app and will get: Guideline 4.3 - Design «We noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam». I asked to write what exactly I copied and how do I understand it in general? This is my application, developed from scratch. There are figma files with the design, roadmap, issue's, etc. I paid $100, spent a three months and got rejected 👍 Сomplete demotivation. With this logic, if there is a «ToDo» application, then no other developers can create a similar one with their own functionality? P.S. My application works with Stable Diffusion, text-to-image/image-to-image for macOS.
Jun ’23
Reply to is there any change for ipv6 on macOS13 and iOS 16?
Hi meaton, Thanks for your reply. IANA has defined a well-known range, 192.0.0.0/29, in [RFC6333], which is dedicated for DS-Lite. Android implement CLAT since 4.3 version, i will got a 192.0.0.x ip address as expected when i connect to the NAT64 WIFI . iOS 15 /macOS 12 will not got a 192.0.0.x IP assigned on the same NAT64 WIFI. The same issue was found on https://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/10dylht/ipv6_ipad/. so, I think that 192.0.0.x is not vend back by the AP, but assigned by iOS 16/macOS 13. I doubt the latest macOS/IOS implement CLAT. Can you confirm it with the apple engineer? ========================= https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7335.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6333 https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/NetworkingInternetWeb/Conceptual/NetworkingOverview/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40010220-CH213-SW1 https://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/10dylht/ipv6_ipad/
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Jun ’23
The AppStore still comes across as "Rigged"
As a developer the app store just feels kind of rigged, and you will never get a reasoned reply to your concerns. Here are two examples which aren't revealed by the new transparency report. I had 10 solitaire variants. My competitor had 10 variants. New rule 4.3 brought in which is fair enough, except that afterwards Apple removed my solitaire variants but allowed my competitor to keep all of theirs. Search for Chess on the app store (note I also have a chess app). Why does an old app with a rating of 3 stars and just 18 ratings come above Magnus Carlsen's app with a 5 star rating? He is the number one chess player in the World and his app is superb. It is exasperating and you will only get a Thank you for your concerns, we have passed them to the relevant department kind of reply. You never hear from them again on the subject. There are 1000s more examples ... The only way Magnus can rectify this is, I poresume, by buying Apple Search Ads.
2
0
760
May ’23
Add resources in Swift Playgrounds 4
How to link binary resources folder in package.swift file from Swift Playgrounds. Given that I cant manually edit the package.swift file. How do I navigate to resolve this? Currently, my targets looks like this: targets: [ .executableTarget( name: AppModule, path: . ) ] I would like to link the resources folder like this: targets: [ .executableTarget( name: AppModule, path: ., resources: [ .process(Resources) ] ) ] Playground Version: 4.3 Please let me know. I am few hours away from the swift student challenge submission. Kindly acknowledge. PLEASE HELP!!!
1
0
1.8k
Apr ’23
Swift Playgrounds release v4.3
Hello, I believe yesterday Apple released the following: v4.3 Apr 3, 2023 Swift Playgrounds 4.3 includes Swift 5.8, the iOS 16.4 SDK, along with other features and bug fixes. Sound Pad shows you how to build your own digital musical instrument Norwegian and Vietnamese language support --- My question is will the app projects now be tested on this latest release? As this is now the only release I have access to on my devices. The terms say that 'Your app playground must be built with and run on Swift Playgrounds 4.2.1 or later' so I assume later means that they will now be judged in 4.3? The update actually caused my previous submission of the app project to crash on launch due to the following line: For some reason this character change fixes the issue: I also updated this for the other instance of Double.random in my code even though it wasn't erroring out. I've already withdrawn and resubmit my entry with the change.
0
0
613
Apr ’23
complaint about the fake activities of two app creators
I am writing to make a complaint about the fake activities of two app creators , which you should take a serious action against them. PDF Scanner & Editor + (https://apps.apple.com/us/developer/hq-tools/id1676624003) Good PDF Editor (https://apps.apple.com/us/developer/khelp-tim-tov/id1650247356) Previously, I had reported these two apps, (https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/718992 ) and now again. These two apps are using spamming strategies and tries to exploit App Store leaks on their marketing. 

 These two apps are exactly same as each other, and it has been creating by one creator, With Different name, But even the seller name has same pattern, Both has TOV expression at the end, It is obviously shown these two apps which are exactly same as each other, has one Creator. Seller: SKOL LTD, TOV Seller: KHELP TIM, TOV Recently Appstore took an action against a leak of the Appstore and those creators who used the word Good in the title of their App Event or name of the app, Now if you look at these
2
0
873
Apr ’23
App rejected after review
Apple app review sent me an e-mail wich said that my App was rejected. I'm publishing my app for the first time so i don't know what to do. They sent me this e-mail: Hello, Thank you for submitting your items for review. We noticed an issue with your submission that requires your attention. Submission ID: 4fadb383-a182-41d6-9fbe-247670c58c30 App Name: Dana in Dzintaru 20 We look forward to working with you to resolve the issues with the following items: App Version 1.0 for iOS Guideline 2.1 - Information Needed We're looking forward to completing our review, but we need more information to continue. Your app uses the AppTrackingTransparency framework, but we are unable to locate the App Tracking Transparency permission request when reviewed on iOS 16.4. Next Steps Please explain where we can find the App Tracking Transparency permission request in your app. The request should appear before any data is collected that could be used to track the user. If you've implemented App Tracking Transparency but the permi
3
0
4.3k
Apr ’23
Reply to Apple did not specify what's wrong with my app and how many days should I wait
They rejected and reviewed it twice ( I did not submit anything). This is what I got after the status was changed several times: Hello, Thank you for your continued patience. We are writing to let you know that we have completed our evaluation of your app and account. Upon further review, we found that your app does not comply with the following guidelines: Guideline 4.3 - Design - Spam Your app has similar features to others. As such, it duplicates the content and functionality of many other similar apps currently available on the App Store. While these app features may be useful, informative or entertaining, we simply have enough of these types of apps on the App Store, and they are considered a form of spam. Next Steps We encourage you to review your app concept and incorporate different content and features that are in compliance with the App Store Review Guidelines. You can avoid delays to future submissions by ensuring your apps don’t attempt to mislead or harm customers or undermine the review
Jan ’23
Reply to Can SAAS-developed template apps pass the review and be published?
Appstore Guideline 4.3 may forbid you to do so. And here are some advices on how to handle it. 4.3 Spam Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase. https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Aug ’23
Unlisted app and SPAM 4.3 rejection
Hello, I would like to know, in case you received a rejection for SPAM 4.3 because there are similar apps on the app store if asking for the app to be released unlisted would solve the problem, as it would not be listed in the app store and would not cause confusion to users. Also the app in question is quite a niche app and it would be enough to distribute it via a link from our website. The app is free. Thank you.
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
547
Activity
Aug ’23
Reply to My App Rejected 4.3 Design: Spam
We have been developing a new app for scanning documents and photos for six months. This app has many unique features that other apps don't have. The app automatically detects holes on the documents that have been punched with a hole punch and removes them from the document. The corners of the detected document are automatically moved inwards to get clean edges, the user can set how many pixels to indented. This app recognises the text very accurately and inserts it into the PDF document behind the image at the exact position and text size as the text on the image. The PDF generated by the app can be searched for text and the text can be marked and copied. Another important feature that no other app in the App Store offers is the function that all four corners of the document are shown enlarged in four circles and are visible at the same time. The user can see immediately if the corners have been recognized satisfactorily or if they should be corrected. The user can move the corners either on the document or
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’23
Reply to My App Rejected 4.3 Design: Spam
At WWDC 2023 I updated my app and will get: Guideline 4.3 - Design «We noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam». I asked to write what exactly I copied and how do I understand it in general? This is my application, developed from scratch. There are figma files with the design, roadmap, issue's, etc. I paid $100, spent a three months and got rejected 👍 Сomplete demotivation. With this logic, if there is a «ToDo» application, then no other developers can create a similar one with their own functionality? P.S. My application works with Stable Diffusion, text-to-image/image-to-image for macOS.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’23
Reply to is there any change for ipv6 on macOS13 and iOS 16?
Hi meaton, Thanks for your reply. IANA has defined a well-known range, 192.0.0.0/29, in [RFC6333], which is dedicated for DS-Lite. Android implement CLAT since 4.3 version, i will got a 192.0.0.x ip address as expected when i connect to the NAT64 WIFI . iOS 15 /macOS 12 will not got a 192.0.0.x IP assigned on the same NAT64 WIFI. The same issue was found on https://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/10dylht/ipv6_ipad/. so, I think that 192.0.0.x is not vend back by the AP, but assigned by iOS 16/macOS 13. I doubt the latest macOS/IOS implement CLAT. Can you confirm it with the apple engineer? ========================= https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7335.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6333 https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/NetworkingInternetWeb/Conceptual/NetworkingOverview/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition/UnderstandingandPreparingfortheIPv6Transition.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40010220-CH213-SW1 https://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/10dylht/ipv6_ipad/
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jun ’23
The AppStore still comes across as "Rigged"
As a developer the app store just feels kind of rigged, and you will never get a reasoned reply to your concerns. Here are two examples which aren't revealed by the new transparency report. I had 10 solitaire variants. My competitor had 10 variants. New rule 4.3 brought in which is fair enough, except that afterwards Apple removed my solitaire variants but allowed my competitor to keep all of theirs. Search for Chess on the app store (note I also have a chess app). Why does an old app with a rating of 3 stars and just 18 ratings come above Magnus Carlsen's app with a 5 star rating? He is the number one chess player in the World and his app is superb. It is exasperating and you will only get a Thank you for your concerns, we have passed them to the relevant department kind of reply. You never hear from them again on the subject. There are 1000s more examples ... The only way Magnus can rectify this is, I poresume, by buying Apple Search Ads.
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
760
Activity
May ’23
Reply to XCode 14.1 always crash
This seems like a bug and you can report it directly to apple at https://feedbackassistant.apple.com You could also first check if it is still in the latest version of Xcode (4.3), as it might already be fixed.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Apr ’23
Add resources in Swift Playgrounds 4
How to link binary resources folder in package.swift file from Swift Playgrounds. Given that I cant manually edit the package.swift file. How do I navigate to resolve this? Currently, my targets looks like this: targets: [ .executableTarget( name: AppModule, path: . ) ] I would like to link the resources folder like this: targets: [ .executableTarget( name: AppModule, path: ., resources: [ .process(Resources) ] ) ] Playground Version: 4.3 Please let me know. I am few hours away from the swift student challenge submission. Kindly acknowledge. PLEASE HELP!!!
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
1.8k
Activity
Apr ’23
Swift playgrounds unsupported file format
Have downloaded playgrounds 4.3 to my iPad Air running ipados 16.5. Trying to use playground “Get started with Apps” but receiving message “Unsupported file format Get Started with Apps.swiftpm cannot be opened in Swift Playgrounds”. I do not have Mac or windows PC so am stuck! Help ??
Replies
5
Boosts
0
Views
5.7k
Activity
Apr ’23
Swift Playgrounds release v4.3
Hello, I believe yesterday Apple released the following: v4.3 Apr 3, 2023 Swift Playgrounds 4.3 includes Swift 5.8, the iOS 16.4 SDK, along with other features and bug fixes. Sound Pad shows you how to build your own digital musical instrument Norwegian and Vietnamese language support --- My question is will the app projects now be tested on this latest release? As this is now the only release I have access to on my devices. The terms say that 'Your app playground must be built with and run on Swift Playgrounds 4.2.1 or later' so I assume later means that they will now be judged in 4.3? The update actually caused my previous submission of the app project to crash on launch due to the following line: For some reason this character change fixes the issue: I also updated this for the other instance of Double.random in my code even though it wasn't erroring out. I've already withdrawn and resubmit my entry with the change.
Replies
0
Boosts
0
Views
613
Activity
Apr ’23
complaint about the fake activities of two app creators
I am writing to make a complaint about the fake activities of two app creators , which you should take a serious action against them. PDF Scanner & Editor + (https://apps.apple.com/us/developer/hq-tools/id1676624003) Good PDF Editor (https://apps.apple.com/us/developer/khelp-tim-tov/id1650247356) Previously, I had reported these two apps, (https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/718992 ) and now again. These two apps are using spamming strategies and tries to exploit App Store leaks on their marketing. 

 These two apps are exactly same as each other, and it has been creating by one creator, With Different name, But even the seller name has same pattern, Both has TOV expression at the end, It is obviously shown these two apps which are exactly same as each other, has one Creator. Seller: SKOL LTD, TOV Seller: KHELP TIM, TOV Recently Appstore took an action against a leak of the Appstore and those creators who used the word Good in the title of their App Event or name of the app, Now if you look at these
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
873
Activity
Apr ’23
App rejected after review
Apple app review sent me an e-mail wich said that my App was rejected. I'm publishing my app for the first time so i don't know what to do. They sent me this e-mail: Hello, Thank you for submitting your items for review. We noticed an issue with your submission that requires your attention. Submission ID: 4fadb383-a182-41d6-9fbe-247670c58c30 App Name: Dana in Dzintaru 20 We look forward to working with you to resolve the issues with the following items: App Version 1.0 for iOS Guideline 2.1 - Information Needed We're looking forward to completing our review, but we need more information to continue. Your app uses the AppTrackingTransparency framework, but we are unable to locate the App Tracking Transparency permission request when reviewed on iOS 16.4. Next Steps Please explain where we can find the App Tracking Transparency permission request in your app. The request should appear before any data is collected that could be used to track the user. If you've implemented App Tracking Transparency but the permi
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
4.3k
Activity
Apr ’23
Reply to Our app got rejected the second time because of 4.3 design spam reason. Need help
same here, I highly believe my App's feature set is unique but still get the 4.3 spam rejection. Really have no idea how the review works, and they never give reason but copy of 4.3 guidline. Also no reply from the appeal.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Mar ’23
Reply to 1 month under review
Hi, What does your app do, that you got flagged for SPAM? Guideline 4.3 - Design We noticed that your app provides the same feature set as other apps submitted to the App Store; it simply varies in content or language, which is considered a form of spam.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jan ’23
Reply to Apple did not specify what's wrong with my app and how many days should I wait
They rejected and reviewed it twice ( I did not submit anything). This is what I got after the status was changed several times: Hello, Thank you for your continued patience. We are writing to let you know that we have completed our evaluation of your app and account. Upon further review, we found that your app does not comply with the following guidelines: Guideline 4.3 - Design - Spam Your app has similar features to others. As such, it duplicates the content and functionality of many other similar apps currently available on the App Store. While these app features may be useful, informative or entertaining, we simply have enough of these types of apps on the App Store, and they are considered a form of spam. Next Steps We encourage you to review your app concept and incorporate different content and features that are in compliance with the App Store Review Guidelines. You can avoid delays to future submissions by ensuring your apps don’t attempt to mislead or harm customers or undermine the review
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Jan ’23