So I read I can use QuickTime to make a preview video for my app and upload to iTunes Connect but I need to have OSX 10.10.3 Yosemite. I currently use OSX 10.9.5 and am fearful of upgrading to 10.10.3 Yosemite because i'm afraid if I do so all my Xcode Projects files on my desktop will get deleted. What can I use to make a video of my app for preview besides OSX Yosemite's QuickTimes feature in simulator? Is there another feature i'm not noticing in Xcode 6.1's simulators that I can use for recording and editing a short video?
Search results for
dsym file
77,671 results found
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
I think the standard approach is a custom URL scheme if your data is short enough to fit in a URL (not sure what limits, if any, there are on the length). There's also the keychain with the same sort of limit - it's meant for small bits of info like passwords.I believe as of iOS 8 you can now have a shared app container so apps from the same developer can share data. One app could write a file and the other app could read it. That, in combination with the URL scheme, may be a more flexible approach.
Topic:
Programming Languages
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
It would be easier if you can convert the .tex file to a PDF.
Topic:
Programming Languages
SubTopic:
Swift
Tags:
When I add a new controller or cell, there is no choice on adding said files to the project's target, then the complier complains that the files cannot be found.
I think that the openParentApplication() is the fallback you would use on Watchkit 1.0 / iOS 8.x deployments. For the Watchkit 2.0 / iOS 9.x deployments, the WatchConnectivity framework is the way to go. I'm not sure how to implement the if #available() tests though, since it appears that Watchkit 1.0 SDK is missing from Xcode 7 currently. Additionally, we'd probably have to assume that the user will be forced to upgrade both iOS (to 9.x) and Watch OS (to 2.x) simultaneously when the production versions are rolled out, so we can use some variant of if #available(iOS 9.0, Watchkit 2.0, *) for our tests.Any thoughts on writing Watchkit 2.0 apps that also run on WK 1.0? Or just assume we push a new version, and keep a couple of branches (yuck!)?[edit] It appears that you can add a WatchKit 1.0 target to the project, and then share some files between the two variants. Now, I still need to find out how to get WatchKit 1.0 sdk into Xcode 7...
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
App Store apps need to be sandboxed.Files or folders explicitly selected by the user will get added to the current sandbox, this requires the user to use either the Open Dialog or do a Drag & Drop of a file system item onto the app.Use security scooped bookmarks if you need to be able to access the file/folder after the app is quit and restarted.
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
Xcode
Tags:
If you select the file and open the Assistant Editor pane on the right side of the main Xcode project window (using the button in the toolbar or the menu View>AssistantEditor>ShowAssistantEditor), one of the sections in the File Inspector has checkboxes which let you manually set which Targets the files should be added to.Sorry, but I don't know why you're not getting the option when you create the files.
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
Xcode
Tags:
I'm seeing the same thing, but the more I struggle, the more I think this is expected. If you notice, when you add a new target, there's a new Watch Framework target. If I add a new Watch framework, I have no problem doing an @import of it. Think about the current frameworks. The framework code lives on your phone. The reason shared frameworks worked before was because the Watch extension and iPhone app both were on your phone. Now, the code for the Watch extension and the iPhone app are on separate devices. While the code might be the same, the code is hosted on physically separate devices. An official comment from Apple would be good, but after messing with search paths for a while and then thinking about the situation, I think it's accurate to say that your shared code is going to need to be duplicated. In my case, this is several constants and networking code.It would be great if Xcode could do this duplication for us, in some sort of omni-framework that automatically gets installed on both devices. After
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Core OS
Tags:
I've run into a rather odd Yosemite bug (filed as rdar://20965476) when swapping the toolbar of an NSWindow.Specifically, for Yosemite-style windows, calling setToolbar (to replace an existing toolbar with a different one) causes the window to spontaneously resize, stretching the content. This is clearly a bug.The question is, how to work around this bug? I've tried all sorts of approaches, with no success.The bug can be reproduced by modifying Apple's ToolbarSample sample code project (https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/samplecode/ToolbarSample/Introduction/Intro.html), as follows:1. Add the following to the end of -awakeFromNib in Controller.m: self.window.titleVisibility = NSWindowTitleHidden; // Yosemite-style toolbar NSRect frame = self.window.frame; // Set the window to a small fixed size at launch frame.origin.y += frame.size.height - 400; frame.size.height = 400; [self.window setFrame:frame display:YES]; [self performSelector:@selector(tweakToolbar:) withObject:nil afterDelay:0.5f];2. Ad
I am developing an app in using swift and core data that will be handling a large amount of photos along with associated data fields.I do not want these photos to be mixed in with the general photos in the ios photo app.What is the best way to handle this for scalability according to apple best practices?Should I just have a core data field that stored the image file name and then sore the image in hte assets folder?Is there a better way?
At WWDC last week it was mentioned a few times that we should aim to support the two most recent versions of iOS (i.e. 8 and 9) in come fall. However, it was also mentioned that we should be able to handle most layout work in Interface Builder, and have to little of it programmatically. I've wanted to migrate to stacked views the instant I heard about them. They're super practical, but are unfortunately only available for iOS 9 devices. Is there a way to create an alternate IB file that doesn't use stacked views, and use that file for older versions of iOS? I'm unsure as to how I can implement stacked views but also provide an alternate to support <= iOS 8. Anyone know how to do this? Should I just not support iOS 8 at all? Feels a little bit silly to jump immediately to only iOS 9.
My Finder has become useless because it sometimes does load my folder/files really slow or it does't load or show anything and I have to restart the Finder everytime. I am now using Path Finder and this works without any problems.Anyone experiencing the same problem?
Hi all, anyone with experience in signing .pkg files for distribution OUTSIDE of the App Store?I'm aware this isn't the right forum, but I couldn't see an appropriate section -sorry in advance.Set up the required private key and installer certificates through the Apple Dev site.Created a .pkg with the WhiteBox Packages software.Note: the content is NOT a standard .app file - it is a set of 3 plug-in files: .component, .vst, and .vst3, which are each moved into their required location upon install.(During this stage, I used the 'identifier' provided on the Apple Dev site: e.g com.companyname.productname)Built the .pkg with no issues.Signed the .pkg using the terminal command:productsign --sign developer-ID-number /path-to-file/xyz.pkg /path-to-new-file/xyz_signed.pkgThis was successful, and the correct information comes up when using the pkgutil --check-signature command.The signed .pkg works perfectly when not quarantined, and behaves as expected.However, re-quaran
After installing El Capitan and Xcode 7 beta, I’ve been trying to rebuild my MacPorts installation from scratch following the Migration instructions at MacPorts. Everything went fine till I tried to build ImageMagick. More precisely, pango (an ImageMagick dependency) failed with the following errors:In file included from <stdin>:6: In file included from /opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_x11_pango/pango/work/pango-1.36.8/pango/pangocoretext.h:28: In file included from /System/Library/Frameworks/Carbon.framework/Headers/Carbon.h:24: In file included from /System/Library/Frameworks/ApplicationServices.framework/Headers/ApplicationServices.h:35: In file included from /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreGraphics.framework/Headers/CoreGraphics.h:43: /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreGraphics.framework/Headers/CGDisplayStream.h:15:1: error: '#pragma clang arc_cf_code_audited' was not ended within this file
What does localizedDescription of the error objet contains? Usually this is something presentable to the user. If it doesn't makes sense or isn't localized I suggest filing a bug report.Dirk
Topic:
UI Frameworks
SubTopic:
UIKit
Tags: