Apple Maps Guides

Two questions please: I understand silently reading NFC tags using NFC libraries is not possible. Is there perhaps a different library which allows reading other types of RFID tags? Is there a way for a company to request silently reading NFC tags on the condition that the relevant app only be deployed internally, never on the apple store? Thanks

Apple sent this response on 18 November 2025: We believe this issue has been addressed. Please verify this matter is resolved after updating to iOS 26.2 beta 3. iOS 26.2 beta 3 (Build: 23C5044b) Posted Date: November 17, 2025 In my testing, the issue seems resolved indeed! Thank you! It is great and encouraging news for SpriteKit users. The issue FB20808104, where both SpriteKit and RealityKit drop frames under SwiftUI views, still holds. I will continue to look for updates on the Feedback Assistant.

Guys pls! East Coast - someone. Flight in 48 hours. Built every feature requested including manual check-in system that isn't even in the published guidelines again it's over 15M of dev work in the bin! We're a registered business. Investor meetings depend on this, partnerships but also our target market initial. If any Apple employee sees this - pls, please look at our submission. We've exceeded every requirement. Video proof, screenshots, everything documented. App ID: 6742558238 Any help appreciated! You have my details I permit you to call and email or whatever you need to do; I consent. Thank you. Neil Saeed

If you'd like Apple to consider adding the functionality you have described, please file an enhancement request using the Feedback Assistant. If you file the request, please post the Feedback number here. In this case since you have suggested a number of separate ideas I recommend filing a separate enhancement request for each one instead of lumping them all into one. That way each can be considered separately. Also, please review Apple's Unsolicited Idea Submission Policy. If you're not familiar with how to file enhancement requests, take a look at Bug Reporting: How and Why?

[quote='868615022, Charita, /thread/805901?answerId=868615022#868615022, /profile/Charita'] It would be helpful if you could suggest a way in which this can be handled at my end. [/quote] I can suggest various options, but there are no good options here. I outlined the reasons for that in my previous post. Ignoring all the build-time stuff for the moment, let’s focus purely on the runtime aspects. You only want one version of this vendor’s code in the client app’s process. Where should that code be? If you statically link it in your framework then the client can’t access it in the normal way. If the client statically links it into their app then your framework can’t easily access it. There’s no standalone framework available from the vendor, so that’s not an option. I see three potential options: You statically link the code into your framework and provide the necessary infrastructure for the client to access it from there. You create a standalone framework from this code, ship it to your clients, and have bo

[quote='868450022, DTS Engineer, /thread/808875?answerId=868450022#868450022'] This gels with my understanding of how things should … work [/quote] Actually, that understanding was wrong. It seems that things only end up on Apple’s ‘naughty’ list if they’re revoked for the right (well, wrong) reasons, specifically, for compromised keys [1]. So, to test this stuff you need to check a certificate that the system really thinks is revoked. A good example is this: https://global-root-ca-revoked.chain-demos.digicert.com/ Using that I crafted a small test program that gets a server’s certificate chain and checks it for revocation. The code is at the end of this post. When I run this on macOS 15.7.1, I see this: will run task, url: https://example.com challenge NSURLAuthenticationMethodServerTrust will check chain did check chain, success: true did run task, status: 200, bytes: 513 will run task, url: https://revoked.badssl.com challenge NSURLAuthenticationMethodServerTrust will check chain did check chain,

It looks like Apple did adjust ASO signals recently and many developers are reporting shifts in keyword weighting especially around titles and metadata relevance.

[quote='868602022, ygbykov, /thread/808088?answerId=868602022#868602022, /profile/ygbykov'] Apple may want to reconsider how it interprets users force-quitting apps. [/quote] If you want to get your “two cents” in front of the folks who have the power to enact change, I suggest you put them in an enhancement request. One of the reasons why these behaviours are not documented is that Apple reserves the right to change them. This has happened in the past, and it’s not hard to imagine it happening again in the future. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

You posted the same comment on that other thread and I’m gonna reply there. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

Bummer. In that case my advice is that you file an enhancement request against App Store Connect help asking for that RSS feedback. Please post your bug number, just for the record. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com