Haptic or Sound queue to allow for the accessibility of the blind (sound) and deaf population (haptic) for even knowing when location services and the camera were last used? Also, the grey notification rather than the purple notification for location services should appear for the full 24 hours after an application has used the app, if the correct description is within the "copy" of Settings The green light lets them know that the application has changed to the camera and fade out orange light both could even have subtle simply click sounds, like a shutter, big haptic, softer sound, but editable in Settings, of course

I've been experimenting with Liquid Glass quite a bit and watched all the WWDC videos. I'm trying to create a glassy segmented picker, like the one used in Camera: however, it seems that no matter what I do there's no way to recreate a truly clear (passthrough) bubble that just warps the light underneath around the edges. Both Glass.regular and Glass.clear seem to add a blur that can not be evaded, which is counter to what clear ought to mean. Here are my results: I've used SwiftUI for my experiment but I went through the UIKit APIs and there doesn't seem to be anything that suggests full transparency. Here is my test SwiftUI code: struct GlassPicker: View { @State private var selected: Int? var body: some View { ScrollView([.horizontal], showsIndicators: false) { HStack(spacing: 0) { ForEach(0..<20) { i in Text("Row \(i)") .id(i) .padding() } } .scrollTargetLayout() } .contentMargins(.horizontal, 161) .scrollTargetBehavior(.viewAligned) .scrollPosition(id: $selected, anchor: .center) .background(.foreground.opacity(0.2)) .clipShape(.capsule) .overlay { DefaultGlassEffectShape() .fill(.clear) // Removes a semi-transparent foreground fill .frame(width: 110, height: 50) .glassEffect(.clear) } } } Is there any way to achieve the above result or does Apple not trust us devs with more granular control over these liquid glass elements?

The new "elevated" tab bar in iPadOS 18 covers the Navigation-/Toolbar of views within. A very simple example: import SwiftUI @main struct SampleApp: App { @State var selection: Int? var body: some Scene { WindowGroup { TabView { NavigationSplitView { List(0..<10, selection: $selection) { item in Text("Item \(item)") .tag(item) } } detail: { if let selection { Text("Detail for \(selection)") .navigationTitle("Item \(selection)") .navigationBarTitleDisplayMode(.inline) } else { Text("No selection") } }.tabItem { Label("Items", systemImage: "list.bullet") } Text("Tab 2") .tabItem { Label("Tab 2", systemImage: "list.bullet") } Text("Tab 3") .tabItem { Label("Another Tab", systemImage: "list.bullet") } } } } } I've tried using .safeAreaInset/.safeAreaPadding for the detail views, but they don't affect the NavigationBar, only the content within. Is there a way to move the NavigationBar down, so its items stay visible?

Hi, I have created a line graph using LineMark in Charts, which by default includes grid lines and axes lines. My requirement is to remove the grid lines but retain the axes lines and the values. I have tried the following code: .chartXAxis { AxisMarks(preset: .extended, values: .stride(by: 2), stroke: StrokeStyle(lineWidth: 0)) } This is removing grid lines as well as axes lines. How to retain axes lines while removing grid lines ?

Hello everyone. I'm building a simple Form in a Multiplatform App with SwiftUI. Originally I had something like this. import SwiftUI struct OnboardingForm: View { @State var firstName: String = "" @State var lastName: String = "" @State var email: String = "" @State var job: String = "" @State var role: String = "" var body: some View { Form { TextField("First Name", text: $firstName, prompt: Text("Required")) TextField("Last Name", text: $lastName, prompt: Text("Required")) TextField("Email", text: $email, prompt: Text("Required")) TextField("Job", text: $job, prompt: Text("Required")) TextField("Role", text: $role, prompt: Text("Required")) } } } #Preview { OnboardingForm() } In macOS it looks ok but then in iOS it looks like this: and it's impossible to know what each field is for if all the prompts are the same. I tried adding LabeledContent around each text field and that solves it for iOS but then on macOS it looks like this: The labels are shown twice and the columns are out of alignment. I think I could get around it by doing something like this: #if os(iOS) LabeledContent { TextField("First Name", text: $firstName, prompt: Text("Required")) } label: { Text("First Name") } #else TextField("First Name", text: $firstName, prompt: Text("Required")) #endif but it seems to me like reinventing the wheel. Is there a "correct" way to declare TextFields with labels that works for both iOS and macOS?

I have an iPhone 15 pro with IOS 18.1 beta 5 and I don’t see in my settings Apple Intelligence & Siri. please help

I’m not seeing Liquid Glass on any standard components. A month ago around July 17th I ran our app and saw Liquid Glass on our tab view and various standard components. Those components have not been changed and yet I’m no longer seeing Liquid Glass in our app at all. Components that were previously liquid glass but now are not include TabView and back navigation buttons. I set the UIDesignRequiresCompatibility key explicitly to false but no luck. I was seeing this in Beta 7 and Beta 8 on a real device and on a sim.

Hi, I am trying to use a flag image inside a picker like this: Picker("Title: ", selection: $selection){ ForEach(datas, id: \.self){ data in HStack{ Text(data.name) if condition { Image(systemName: "globe") }else { Image(img) } } .tag(data.name) .padding() } } All images are loading successfully but only system images are resized correctly. Images loaded from Assets are appearing in their default size. I have tried to size the images with frames, etc but with no luck. Any idea, help will be much appreciated. Thanks in advance!

I can’t figure out how to make the iOS 18 photoshop template for app icons work. In the past, each variant of the icon size was an editable layer you could open up, change and save. In this one, only the large App Store icons are editable. So I thought maybe if I put my icon in the App Store layer, the smaller icons would automatically scale and fill in. But they don’t. When I checkmark the generate assets option, it generates all the icon files, but all of them are blank, except for the App Store one. I don’t really want the smaller icons to just automatically scale down anyway; I would rather have them be fine-tuned by hand so that they look good at all sizes. I used the sketch template in a free trial of sketch and it automatically scaled and generated all of the icon sizes, as expected. But I don’t own sketch; I use Photoshop and Illustrator for all of my work. I’ve always been able to use the template in the past; it’s only this year‘s iOS 18 version that isn’t working for me.

We are currently developing a dating app. Considering that the number of users will be relatively small at the initial launch, we are thinking of offering subscription features for free, such as flight mode and read receipts. This means that our initial version will be a completely free product with no in-app purchases or subscriptions. However, we are concerned that this might lead to rejection during the App Store review process. We would greatly appreciate any guidance from the Apple review team on whether this approach is acceptable. Thank you very much!

Emoji keyboard are way too big after updating to IOS 18.1 so anoying to use emojis now. I really don't like using emojis anymore. I really hope they are going to fix this quickly. I use my phone for work and pleasure. I don't needing my heart to be bigger or different colors to every reaction. Please bring back the smaller emoji keyboard or add a setting to switch it back. This is really annoying.

Summary: At WWDC24, a new transition was introduced by the Apple Design team (.contentTransition(.symbolEffect(.replace))) I was writing a post about it on my LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/alex-fila/), and out of curiosity I tried multiple symbols with slashes. Many of them were not well center aligned during a new symbol effect. Some of the examples are: "speaker.fill" : "speaker.slash.fill”, "eye.fill" : "eye.slash.fill”. Please check the attached Swift file for more details and full SwiftUI View with issues. Steps to Reproduce: Create a new IOS App project in XCode. Create a new SwiftUI File. Initiate state variable: @State private var isSpeakerOn = true. Create a new image with transition: Image(systemName: isSpeakerOn ? "speaker.fill" : "speaker.slash.fill") .contentTransition(.symbolEffect(.replace)). 5. Create a switcher or set a timer with a constant variable to toggle isSpeakerOn value (see attachment file). 6. Toggle isSpeakerOn value. 7. Observe the issue (2 symbols are not well center aligned during transition). Expected Results: During transition .contentTransition(.symbolEffect(.replace)) 2 SF symbols ("speaker.fill" : "speaker.slash.fill”) are well center aligned. Actual Results: During transition (when slash slowly appears on top of SF symbol), the main symbol is moved a few points up, creating a decentralized effect and making the user experience feel inconsistent. Notes: There are 200 SF Symbols with .slash that might be affected. It happens on latest Xcode and macOS versions, and could be a top priority for the Apple Design Team. import SwiftUI struct BUG: View { @State private var isSpeakerOn = true let timer = Timer.publish(every: 1.5, on: .main, in: .common).autoconnect() let columns = [ GridItem(.flexible(), spacing: 20), GridItem(.flexible(), spacing: 20) ] var body: some View { LazyVGrid(columns: columns, spacing: 60) { Text("❌").font(.system(size: 100)) Image(systemName: isSpeakerOn ? "speaker.fill" : "speaker.slash.fill") .font(.system(size: 200)) .frame(width: 200, height: 100, alignment: .center) .contentTransition(.symbolEffect(.replace)) .symbolRenderingMode(.palette) .foregroundStyle( Color.primary, Color.accentColor) .onReceive(timer) { _ in withAnimation(.spring(response: 0.3, dampingFraction: 0.7)) {isSpeakerOn.toggle()}} Text("✅").font(.system(size: 100)) Image(systemName: isSpeakerOn ? "bell.fill" : "bell.slash.fill") .font(.system(size: 170)) .frame(width: 150, height: 150, alignment: .center) .contentTransition(.symbolEffect(.replace)) .symbolRenderingMode(.palette) .foregroundStyle( Color.primary, Color.accentColor) .onReceive(timer) { _ in withAnimation(.spring(response: 0.3, dampingFraction: 0.7)) {isSpeakerOn.toggle()}} Text("❌").font(.system(size: 100)) Image(systemName: isSpeakerOn ? "eye.fill" : "eye.slash.fill") .font(.system(size: 150)) .frame(width: 200, height: 100, alignment: .center) .contentTransition(.symbolEffect(.replace)) .symbolRenderingMode(.palette) .foregroundStyle( Color.primary, Color.accentColor) .onReceive(timer) { _ in withAnimation(.spring(response: 0.3, dampingFraction: 0.7)) {isSpeakerOn.toggle()}} } .padding(40) }} #Preview { BUG() }

We recently received feedback under Guideline 4.3(b) suggesting our app duplicates functionality found in other apps in this category. However, our app is fundamentally not a dating app. It is a conversation facilitator designed to foster meaningful connections for friendships, networking, and shared interests. While romantic connections may occur naturally, they are not the primary focus. Thus, we are seeking insights on this key question: How do developers effectively demonstrate feature differentiation to reviewers? We want to clearly show how our app’s functionality uniquely addresses user needs and provides value beyond existing solutions. Our Core Features: Our app introduces distinct features that differentiate it from traditional apps in this space: Paths: Psychology-based prompts embedded in chats encourage users to explore meaningful topics like values and aspirations. These prompts are dynamically triggered to keep conversations engaging and productive. Aura: A rewards system that incentivizes thoughtful, high-quality engagement by awarding points for meaningful conversations, which can unlock additional features. Spark Matches: Real-time, themed events pair users for structured, 15-minute conversations on topics like technology or travel. Curated prompts ensure the focus is on shared interests, not romance. Flame Matches: AI-personalized matches adapt to user conversations, connecting individuals based on compatibility. Chats begin anonymously, focusing on personalities rather than appearances, and are designed for platonic, professional, or friendship connections. Market Analysis: Our app addresses key gaps in the connection space: No apps embed conversation prompts directly into chats; nor do they trigger them regularly or dynamically, to foster deeper discussions over a sustained period. No apps have rewards systems designed to specifically incentivize meaningful engagement. No apps have matchmaking systems that adapt dynamically based on users’ past conversations. No apps support the combination of real-time, one-on-one themed conversations with curated prompts. Traction: As an incorporated business with over a year of experience, we have helped thousands of users build platonic, professional, and interest-based connections. For example, users in relationships join our events to find new friends, and professionals use Spark Matches to discuss shared interests like technology. Consistent feedback highlights our prompts and structured events as refreshing alternatives to superficial, appearance-driven platforms. Our rapidly growing user base has validated the demand for these features, and we would like to bring this experience natively to them via a mobile app on the App Store. Additional Context: While some basic chat functionality may overlap with existing platforms, our focus is on facilitating meaningful conversations and incentivizing a thoughtful conversation culture that represents a novel approach validated by user research and feedback. We welcome advice from developers who have successfully highlighted their app’s uniqueness when facing similar review challenges. Thank you in advance! :)

Dear Apple Developer Relations Team, We are currently reviewing the documentation for the UIDesignRequiresCompatibility Info.plist key. In the documentation, there is a warning that states: "Temporarily use this key while reviewing and refining your app’s UI for the design in the latest SDKs." However, in the adoption guide for Liquid Glass: Adopting Liquid Glass, we did not see any explicit requirement to force adoption of the Liquid Glass design. We have the Gojek app, which currently uses the UIDesignRequiresCompatibility key. To ensure long-term stability, we would like clarification on the following points: Future Support of the Key: Is it safe to continue using the UIDesignRequiresCompatibility key? Can you confirm whether this key will remain supported or if there are plans for it to be deprecated/removed in future iOS versions? Liquid Glass Adoption: Our app’s design guidelines do not align with the Liquid Glass style. Can you confirm that adoption of Liquid Glass is not mandatory, and that apps can continue to use their existing custom design guidelines without any restrictions? Compatibility with iOS 26: Are there any required changes we need to make to our existing views to ensure that the UI will continue to render as it does today on iOS 26 and beyond? We want to make sure we provide the best user experience while remaining compliant with Apple’s guidelines. Your clarification would help us plan our design and development roadmap accordingly. Thank you for your support and guidance.

I am experiencing an issue when publishing my .NET MAUI application for iOS using Visual Studio Code. During the publishing process, I encountered a codesign error. Hope someone can help me. This is the error: Warning: unable to build chain to self-signed root for signer "Apple Distribution: SOFTBUILDER SDN. BHD. (********)" /Users/frankongthuanhong/Desktop/App/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/bin/Release/net8.0-ios/ios-arm64/MLBusinessCafe_Maui.app: errSecInternalComponent /usr/local/share/dotnet/packs/Microsoft.iOS.Sdk.net8.0_18.0/18.0.8316/tools/msbuild/iOS/Xamarin.Shared.targets(2335,3): error : /usr/bin/codesign exited with code 1: [/Users/frankongthuanhong/Desktop/App/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui.csproj::TargetFramework=net8.0-ios] /usr/local/share/dotnet/packs/Microsoft.iOS.Sdk.net8.0_18.0/18.0.8316/tools/msbuild/iOS/Xamarin.Shared.targets(2335,3): error : Warning: unable to build chain to self-signed root for signer "Apple Distribution: SOFTBUILDER SDN. BHD. (U44UY7DYY7)" [/Users/frankongthuanhong/Desktop/App/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui.csproj::TargetFramework=net8.0-ios] /usr/local/share/dotnet/packs/Microsoft.iOS.Sdk.net8.0_18.0/18.0.8316/tools/msbuild/iOS/Xamarin.Shared.targets(2335,3): error : /Users/frankongthuanhong/Desktop/App/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/bin/Release/net8.0-ios/ios-arm64/MLBusinessCafe_Maui.app: errSecInternalComponent [/Users/frankongthuanhong/Desktop/App/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui.csproj::TargetFramework=net8.0-ios] /usr/local/share/dotnet/packs/Microsoft.iOS.Sdk.net8.0_18.0/18.0.8316/tools/msbuild/iOS/Xamarin.Shared.targets(2335,3): error : Failed to codesign '/Users/frankongthuanhong/Desktop/App/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/bin/Release/net8.0-ios/ios-arm64/MLBusinessCafe_Maui.app': Warning: unable to build chain to self-signed root for signer "Apple Distribution: SOFTBUILDER SDN. BHD. (U44UY7DYY7)" [/Users/frankongthuanhong/Desktop/App/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui.csproj::TargetFramework=net8.0-ios] /usr/local/share/dotnet/packs/Microsoft.iOS.Sdk.net8.0_18.0/18.0.8316/tools/msbuild/iOS/Xamarin.Shared.targets(2335,3): error : /Users/frankongthuanhong/Desktop/App/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/bin/Release/net8.0-ios/ios-arm64/MLBusinessCafe_Maui.app: errSecInternalComponent [/Users/frankongthuanhong/Desktop/App/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui.csproj::TargetFramework=net8.0-ios] /usr/local/share/dotnet/packs/Microsoft.iOS.Sdk.net8.0_18.0/18.0.8316/tools/msbuild/iOS/Xamarin.Shared.targets(2335,3): error : [/Users/frankongthuanhong/Desktop/App/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui.csproj::TargetFramework=net8.0-ios] /usr/local/share/dotnet/packs/Microsoft.iOS.Sdk.net8.0_18.0/18.0.8316/tools/msbuild/iOS/Xamarin.Shared.targets(2335,3): error : [/Users/frankongthuanhong/Desktop/App/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui/MLBusinessCafe_Maui.csproj::TargetFramework=net8.0-ios]

Hello fellow developers and Apple employees As I'm sure we're all tired of seeing, my app has been rejected under 4.3.0 Design: Spam I am frankly struggling to understand the logic. Here are the main features of my 2D Arcade game: simulation of flying above a field of lava. This is a tense experience! One mess-up, and the player is sent to the lava below! it has a jetpack which continuously uses fuel. Again, tension! You have to be careful about when and where you glide--can you grab that fuel pod? Oh no--it disappeared! it allows players to glide and fly around the map. Gliding gives a brief respite from the tension. Flying lets the players explore the fascinating world of Hokusai's 40 views from Mount Fuji. it allows players to collect fuel pods, refueling their jet pack. This reward not only allows them to play longer, it bumps their score, and promotes a goal of beating previous scores. it allows players to view a parallax background of woodcuts from 40 views from Mount Fuji, a famous work by Hokusai, which broadens cultural boundaries it requires players to dodge red clouds, which end the game. These clouds are nefarious--they follow the player around! it allows players to rest on white clouds, which restores their fuel. Again, a relief from the tension. the white clouds disappear after a moment, adding an element of tension--wouldn't it be nice if they lasted forever? Sure--but then the game would be boring and repetitive (and it WOULD be spam) Architecture: Godot using GDScript I admit--I initially included reference material that was not mine to distribute. 100% my mistake, and I removed that prior to resubmitting. Now though, my app continues to be rejected as spam--this most recent rejection occurred within 10 mins of the last submission. I'd be happy to post my game online if someone would like to play. Yes, it's simple--and yes, it's arcade-esque. Has anyone successfully reversed a 4.3.0 Design Spam designation on an app? I would rather not create a new app to submit, as I understand that is against the TOS--but is a commonly discussed workaround. Is it because I'm using GDScript? Should I rewrite into c#? I don't know that I can "fix" my game, as it's intended to be quite simple.

Hello, Appeal Ticket: APL149985 Thank you for your patience as we considered your appeal. The App Review Board determined that the original rejection feedback was valid. Your app does not comply with: 4.3(a) - Design During our review, we found that this app duplicates the content and functionality of other apps submitted to the App Store, which is considered a form of spam and not appropriate for the App Store. Apps submitted to the App Store should be unique and should not duplicate other apps. We encourage you to create a unique app to submit to the App Store. For more information about developing apps for the App Store, visit the Develop section of the Apple Developer website. We appreciate your efforts to resolve this issue and look forward to reviewing your revised submission. Best regards, Leo App Review Board BlockQuote a Blockchain based slg game got 4.3 a, I think the reviewer should know some thing about blockchain. 您好，我已经重新提交了一个版本的应用，和之前版本已经不同了，目前游戏的所有代码都是我自己写的，第三方的所有代码都被我移除了，所以代码上重复了其他游戏的是完全不存在的。 至于游戏玩法上，新的自定义技能冲榜系统，玩家可以通过“抽卡-编辑阵容-连续挑战”的方式，在遇到瓶颈时自定义技能突破关卡，这个玩法绝对是开创性的，因为已知的所有slg游戏的技能都是官方设计决定的，但是在我设计的这个玩法上，理论上所有的技能都将由玩家设计出来，这差别之大，正如区块链开创了一种崭新的去中心化的时代，和原有中心化的模式是完全不同的，据我所知，目前市面上不存在任何一款去中心化的slg游戏。但是您，尊贵的审核人员居然认为这样一款开创性的游戏是和其他中心化游戏是一样的，类同的，我相信苹果作为全球最伟大的科技公司，官方工作人员都是很专业的，都是很有见识的，都是主张创新的，主张玩家能获得独特的高质量的体验，但是这个拒绝让我疑惑。

辅助功能 | Apple Developer Documentation In the illustration on this page related to "Prefer system-defined colors," Light is incorrectly translated as "细体". However, in the context of this article, translating it as "浅色" (light color) would be a more appropriate choice.

Scenario is when keyboard is opened within the app being developed then switch to other app, for instance, Notes app and create a note to enable keyboard from there. While the Notes app keyboard is active switch back to the developed app the keyboard in it is dismissed. Any thoughts?Thanks

Hi everyone, im in the process of delving more into coregraphics with swiftui, but I am at a roadblock. First I would like to ask, what are some good resources to learn coregraphics? Secondly: I currently have a circle view made and what I want to do is to make my circle view modular so that it can be directly connected to another given circle by a line. How can I do this? For example, I want my circles to represent nodes and be able to connect by lines to other nodes that are related. Thanks in advanced. Here is my code for the circle view: @State private var circleProgress: CGFloat = 0 let timer = Timer.publish(every: 0.016, on: .main, in: .common).autoconnect() private let animationDuration: TimeInterval = 1.5 @Binding var startPoint: CGPoint @Binding var endPoint: CGPoint var body: some View { GeometryReader { geometry in Canvas { context, size in // Circle parameters let circleSize: CGFloat = 50 let circleOrigin = CGPoint( x: size.width / 4, y: size.height / 2 - circleSize / 2 ) let circleRect = CGRect( origin: circleOrigin, size: CGSize(width: circleSize, height: circleSize) ) let circleCenter = CGPoint( x: circleOrigin.x + circleSize / 2, y: circleOrigin.y + circleSize / 2 ) // Animate circle creation var circlePath = Path() circlePath.addArc( center: circleCenter, radius: circleSize / 2, startAngle: .degrees(0), endAngle: .degrees(360 * circleProgress), clockwise: false ) context.addFilter(.shadow(color: .white.opacity(0.6), radius: 5, x: 1, y: 1)) // Add white shadow context.stroke( circlePath, with: .linearGradient( Gradient(colors: [.purple, .white]), startPoint: circleRect.origin, endPoint: CGPoint(x: circleRect.maxX, y: circleRect.maxY) ), lineWidth: 5 ) } .frame(width: 300, height: 150) .onReceive(timer) { _ in // Update circle progress let progressChange = 0.02 / animationDuration if circleProgress < 1.0 { circleProgress = min(circleProgress + progressChange, 1.0) } else { circleProgress = 0.0 // Reset the circle to repeat the animation } // Get the starting and ending points of the Canvas view startPoint = CGPoint(x: geometry.frame(in: .global).minX, y: geometry.frame(in: .global).minY) endPoint = CGPoint(x: geometry.frame(in: .global).maxX, y: geometry.frame(in: .global).maxY) // Print the points for debugging print("Start Point: \(startPoint.x), \(startPoint.y)") print("End Point: \(endPoint.x), \(endPoint.y)") } } .frame(width: 300, height: 150) } }