“Apple Maps Guides”

I am a professional user of the 2019 Mac Pro (7,1) with dual AMD Radeon Pro W6900X MPX modules (32GB VRAM each). This hardware is designed for high-performance compute, but it is currently crippled for modern local LLM/AI workloads under Linux due to Apple's EFI/PCIe routing restrictions. Core Issue: rocminfo reports No HIP GPUs available when attempting to use ROCm/amdgpu on Linux Apple's custom EFI firmware blocks full initialization of professional GPU compute assets The dual W6900X GPUs have 64GB combined VRAM and high-bandwidth Infinity Fabric Link, but cannot be fully utilized for local AI inference/training My Specific Request: Apple should provide an official, one-click deployable application that enables full utilization of dual W6900X GPUs for local large language model (LLM) inference and training under Linux. This application must: Fully initialize both W6900X GPUs via HIP/ROCm, establishing valid compute contexts Bypass artificial EFI/PCIe routing restrictions that bloc

I am a professional user of the 2019 Mac Pro (7,1) with dual AMD Radeon Pro W6900X MPX modules (32GB VRAM each). This hardware is designed for high-performance compute, but it is currently crippled for modern local LLM/AI workloads under Linux due to Apple's EFI/PCIe routing restrictions. Core Issue: rocminfo reports No HIP GPUs available when attempting to use ROCm/amdgpu on Linux Apple's custom EFI firmware blocks full initialization of professional GPU compute assets The dual W6900X GPUs have 64GB combined VRAM and high-bandwidth Infinity Fabric Link, but cannot be fully utilized for local AI inference/training My Specific Request: Apple should provide an official, one-click deployable application that enables full utilization of dual W6900X GPUs for local large language model (LLM) inference and training under Linux. This application must: Fully initialize both W6900X GPUs via HIP/ROCm, establishing valid compute contexts Bypass artificial EFI/PCIe routing restrictions that bloc

The background I'm finally working to convert my very old Mac kaleidoscope application, ScopeWorks, which was written in OpenGL and Objective-C, to a Multiplatform app in SwiftUI and Metal. I'm using the MetalKit MTKView class, wrapped for SwiftUI as an NSViewRepresentable or UIViewRepresentable. I then provide an MTKViewDelegate that provides a draw method. The draw method fetches the current render pass descriptor, creates a command buffer, sets up a render pipeline, and does its drawing. My renderer's makePipeline method looks like this: func makePipeline() { let library = device.makeDefaultLibrary() let pipelineDesc = MTLRenderPipelineDescriptor() pipelineDesc.vertexFunction = library?.makeFunction(name: vertex_main) pipelineDesc.fragmentFunction = library?.makeFunction(name: fragment_main) pipelineDesc.colorAttachments[0].pixelFormat = .bgra8Unorm pipeline = try! device.makeRenderPipelineState(descriptor: pipelineDesc) } And my shaders look like this: struct VertexOut { float4 position [[position]]; floa

We regularly submit builds, manage provisioning profiles, and query build statuses for a large number of applications across multiple store accounts. We rely on automated tooling (Fastlane / App Store Connect API) to manage this pipeline efficiently. Recently, we have been experiencing HTTP 5xx errors when making requests to Apple's APIs (App Store Connect, Spaceship). We believe these failures are caused by rate limiting applied to our outbound IP addresses, as the errors correlate with periods of higher submission activity. We have already taken steps on our side to mitigate the issue - including distributing requests across multiple external IP addresses - but we continue to encounter these errors during peak release periods, which delays application delivery to our clients and their end users.

Is it mandatory for all developers to migrate to Xcode 26 starting from April 28, 2026? What happens if a developer submits or distributes a build created using Xcode 16 after April 28, 2026? Will it still be accepted or supported? Our app is distributed only via an internal company portal (not through the App Store). In this case, are we still required to build and distribute the app using Xcode 26 after April 28, 2026? If a hotfix is required before our next planned release (July 2026), how safe is it to use the UIDesignRequiresCompatibility flag as a temporary solution, assuming Xcode 26 becomes mandatory? Are there any risks or limitations associated with this approach? What are the potential issues if a team continues development on Xcode 16 while others have migrated to Xcode 26? For example, could there be compatibility, build, or integration challenges in such a mixed environment? If the UIDesignRequiresCompatibility flag is used as a temporary workaround, what would be the impact if Apple la

I have a macOS VPN app with a Network Extension (packet tunnel provider) distributed outside the App Store via Developer ID. Everything works perfectly when running from Xcode. After archiving and exporting for Developer ID distribution, the extension launches but immediately gets killed by nesessionmanager. The error: Signature check failed: code failed to satisfy specified code requirement(s) followed by: started with PID 0 status changed to disconnected, last stop reason Plugin failed What makes this interesting: the extension process does launch. AMFI approves it, taskgated-helper validates the provisioning profile and says allowing entitlement(s) due to provisioning profile, the sandbox is applied, PacketTunnelProvider is created — but then Apple's Security framework internally fails the designated requirement check and nesessionmanager kills the session. Key log sequence: taskgated-helper: Checking profile: Developer ID - MacOS WireGuardExtension taskgated-helper: allowing entitlement(s) for co

Hi, my subscriptions say Waiting for Review on Apple Connect. How do I get them to Approved?