missing package product

The error occurred when fio attempted to verify the second 1MB data block (starting at offset 1,048,576). So what's IS there? And what should have been? These test use hashes for verification because it's the quickest way to validate the data, but the question I'm interested in here is what your driver actually put on disk. Part of my concern here is that unless you artificially cut power to the device, we shouldn't have needed any explicit cache sync as part of the copy. The system should have flushed all of it's buffers to your DEXT as part of unmount and you should have flushed them to disk shortly after that. If this is really about cache flushing, that's the failure case I'd really be concerned* about here, not the individual copy. *Failure to flush a file loses file data. Failure to flush file system blocks loses volumes. __ Kevin Elliott DTS Engineer, CoreOS/Hardware

I'm sorry for the delay in submitting a feedback item; a cross-country move happened. Not a problem, I've got plenty to keep my busy! That leads to here: I've submitted FB21093202. So, looking over the bug, there are a few things I want to clarify: F_FULLFSYNC is basically always going to be relatively slow. The API operates on a file handle, but flushing the volume to a coherent state is a broader operation the final I/O command is a device command. All of that makes it a fairly heavy operation. On the APFS side, the specific concern I have here is about the performance dip at high core count. That's partly because of the immediate issue and mostly because our core count has been increasing, and we need to be watching for these concurrency bottlenecks. Cross platform comparisons are very tricky here because the platforms are (ideally) making different design decisions based on the specifics of of their particular use case and user base. For example, in an enterprise/server environment, there's an argument th

I appreciate your previous answer. Could you please clarify what exactly is meant by “manually reset preferences” in this context? Which settings and user data are expected to be reset? Are there any settings that should explicitly not be affected? (e.g. login state, account data, personalization data etc.) What should the expected user experience be after a full reset? For example, should the app return to default configuration/factory settings? Should we display warnings or confirmation dialogs before performing the reset? If so, what exactly should the user be informed about (data loss, required reconfiguration, etc.)?

Thanks for the replay @DTS Engineer. You are right on my requirement, currently I am looking for iOS but I would be happy with a solution that works across apple platforms as well. If so, to what end? To answer your query on why I want to detect debug build I won't be able to share my exact use-case but I will share a parallel use-case that currently Apple uses: Currently Apple allows developers to send push notifications to iOS with APNS. From what I understand, APNS exposes sandbox and production environments which are controlled with aps-environment entitlement. Since, Apple controls the tooling side of iOS development, they can inject entitlement based on the provisioning profile. I want to achieve something similar to this where the REST API domain used by my framework is decided based on either provisioning profile or build type. A lot of the time it’s not the build configuration that matters, it’s the way that the app was signed. Or the way that’s it’s run (from Xcode or like a user would).

[quote='807744021, HarimaSun, /thread/807744, /profile/HarimaSun'] Does this mean ODR will be deprecated? [/quote] Yes. We said that explicitly in WWDC 2025 Session 325 Discover Apple-Hosted Background Assets. [quote='807744021, HarimaSun, /thread/807744, /profile/HarimaSun'] If so, when will it officially take effect? [/quote] AFAIK there’s no announced timeline. However, the message seems pretty clear to me: It wouldn’t be wise to use ODR in a new product. Note that the above-mentioned WWDC session also introduced Apple-host background assets, which covers much the same territory as ODR. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com

Hi @changFei, You wrote: After the app transfer: If a user logs in via an existing pre-transfer version of the app (published under Team A before transfer), will the Apple Sign-In token’s sub (or private email) switch to new value tie to Team B, or unchanged? The user ID and private email address will remain unchanged—the value associated with Team A will continue to be provided. After the 60-day transfer period, Sign in with Apple will fail until they update the app (now associated only with Team B). Then, you wrote: Since our app-transfer is an internal transfer (no change in app ownership outside our organization), is there a way to retain the original sub value（or private email） for users after the transfer? Please follow the steps outlined in the post below and reply here with your Feedback ID so we can discuss a potential solution for your organization: Gathering required information for troubleshooting Sign in with Apple user migration https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/762829 Lastly, you wrote: