Hi everyone, I’m trying to submit my first release with In-App Purchases, but I can’t keep the IAP attached to the submission. Status: Not published yet (first release) Version: 5.0.0 (multiple builds: (7), (8), etc.) What happens I upload a new build and select it for version 5.0.0. I go to Add for Review and select my newly created IAP (auto-renewable subscriptions). I submit the version. When I re-open the submission details, the IAP section is empty (they no longer appear as “Included in this submission”). The result is a double failure: App rejection (Guideline 2.1 – “IAP not found in the submitted binary”). Each IAP is also rejected for lack of a binary in its review context. It looks like the IAP and the build keep getting detached from each other after I submit. Since this is my first version, I’ve tried changing builds and even editing version metadata, but it still feels like I’m just “editing the first version” rather than creating a fresh link between this binary and these IAP. What I already tried Creating the IAP and selecting them during Add for Review. Ensuring the IAP have complete metadata/localizations and pricing. Re-submitting using a new build number (5.0.0 (8), etc.). Checking Monetization → In-App Purchases and Subscriptions; products exist, but after submit they stop appearing under the submission. (When testing the opposite path) Removing IAP entirely for a non-IAP release — but Review still referenced IAP “linked” on their side. Questions What is the exact, canonical sequence to link a new build to newly created IAP so they remain listed under “Included in this submission” after I hit Submit? For first-time IAP, do I need to press Submit for Review on each IAP product before selecting them in the app submission? Or is selecting them during Add for Review enough? Which product statuses are required so that IAP do not drop off the submission? (Ready to Submit vs Waiting for Review, etc.) Can changing the build (or editing version metadata) after attaching IAP cause them to be silently removed from the submission? Since this app is not yet published, is it advisable to create a new app version (e.g., 5.0.1) to “reset” the linkage, or should a new build under 5.0.0 be sufficient? Any guidance or a step-by-step checklist to keep IAP attached to the submission would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! — Victor

I’m running into an issue where the com.apple.developer.storekit entitlement is not being included in provisioning profiles, even though my App ID is properly configured for In-App Purchase. Entitlements file: explicitly includes <key>com.apple.developer.storekit</key> <true/> Capability: In-App Purchase is enabled in the Apple Developer Portal and shows as “Enabled.” What I’ve tried: Automatic signing in Xcode → profiles generated, but missing com.apple.developer.storekit Manual signing → deleted and recreated provisioning profiles multiple times; entitlement still missing. Waited several hours for possible propagation. Verified that my in-app purchase products are set up correctly. Error message: Provisioning profile "iOS Team Provisioning Profile: zu.inniu" doesn't include the com.apple.developer.storekit entitlement Question: Has anyone else encountered this? Is there a step I might be missing to get StoreKit entitlements included in provisioning profiles, or could this be a backend issue that needs escalation through Apple DTS? This is blocking me from building my app for physical devices, so any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

I am attempting to test non-consumable sandbox purchases, however I am unable to select the "Approve Transaction" option after initiating a purchase. Leaving the transaction in a permanent pending state. I can view the transaction in the transaction manager by navigating to Debug -> Storekit -> Manage Transactions.. but the only available options to select are "Refund Transaction" or "Delete Transaction". What am I missing about Xcode or my environment that is preventing me from testing this purchase flow? Some more information about my set up. I have a .storekit file synced to AppStore Connect with my product Id. There's a StoreKitTestCertificate.cert saved in the project. I've tried running the build on my phone as Debug, Release and ReleaseForRunning all with the same behavior after making a purchase. My phone is logged into a sandbox test user apple account in the developer iOS settings

We’ve been approved for the Advanced Commerce API and are setting up the generic product identifiers per the guide: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/advancedcommerceapi/setting-up-your-project-for-advanced-commerce#Set-up-generic-product-identifiers We have multiple auto-renewable subscriptions (for simplicity: Product 1, Product 2, etc.). We created a new subscription group for Advanced Commerce and are about to add the subscription(s) inside that group. Should we create one auto-renewable subscription (generic, e.g. subscription.ac) to represent all of our subscriptions, or one generic per product family (e.g., product1.ac, product2.ac, …)? If the answer depends on whether subscribers can hold multiple products simultaneously, please advise which structure supports that (e.g., separate groups). Reporting identifiers / segmentation: In Sales and Trends and Payments & Financial Reports, which identifier(s) will appear after migration: the legacy StoreKit product_id, the new generic product id, and/or the SKU? If we use a single generic subscription for all products, what’s Apple’s recommended way to segment revenue by product (Product 1 vs. Product 2)? If SKUs don’t surface in these reports, should we prefer multiple generics/groups to preserve report-level segmentation?

Hi, We have a app with some auto-renewing subscription in a group of subscriptions. When a user upgrade from a subscription to another, the "user receive a refund of the prorated amount of their original subscription" (https://developer.apple.com/app-store/subscriptions/). How is the prorated calculated ? Example : subscription to 14,99$ / month. If subscriber upgrade after 10 days, is the refund calculated 10/30 of 14,99$ (so ~5$) ?

Hello everyone, For example, our app currently has one subscription group in App Store Connect with 5 plans (2 annual, 2 monthly, and 1 quarterly). By default, users can go into Apple Subscriptions in Settings and freely switch between all of these plans. However, our business requirement is to only allow users to stay on one annual plan and one quarterly plan. We don’t want them to switch to the other plans. My questions are: Is there any best practice or recommended approach to restrict subscription switching within the same group? Would removing the unwanted products from sale be the correct approach, or are there any risks/downsides with this method? Has anyone faced a similar situation and found a practical solution? Any guidance or shared experience would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Hello, I’m experiencing an issue with StoreKit 2 when passing a new appAccountToken for each purchase request. Case-ID: 15948169 (for DTS reference) Description of the Problem When initiating a purchase, I generate a new UUID to use as the appAccountToken: let serverTransactionId = UUID() let options: Set<Product.PurchaseOption> = [ .appAccountToken(serverTransactionId) ] let result = try await product.purchase(options: options) Expected Behavior: Each new purchase should return the updated appAccountToken that I pass into the purchase options. Actual Behavior: The payload response after success always contains the same appAccountToken from the very first transaction. It ignores subsequent UUIDs I pass and keeps reusing the original one. This causes issues because the same identifier is being reused across multiple transactions, making it difficult to map purchases to the correct user session. Steps to Reproduce Generate a fresh UUID using UUID(). Pass it as .appAccountToken when calling purchase(). Complete the transaction in the sandbox environment. Inspect the payload response → The appAccountToken value is always the same as the first one used, not the newly provided one. Additional Info I do have a focused test project that reproduces this issue. The issue appears specific to appAccountToken persistence across multiple transactions. Has anyone else experienced this behavior with StoreKit 2? Is this expected (Apple caching the first token) or could this be a bug?

I would like to know if it is allowed to offer the user to either unlock the app immediately or partake in a 3-day trial period before making a purchase. I created 2 IAP non-consumable products; 1 for the immediate [which is at a discount] and for the after trial period ends [this is at a higher cost]. Is this something that Apple allows or is frowned upon?

What is the expected behavior for App Receipts and ASSN v2 notifications when a subscription is set to "Remove from Sale"? I tried to test this in Sandbox, but the "Remove from Sale" setting in App Store Connect doesn't seem to affect the Sandbox environment. For existing subscribers, what happens in the receipt? Does auto_renew_status change to 0 and is expiration_intent populated immediately? Also, which notificationType is sent via ASSN v2?

I want to test the "Remove from Sale" scenario in Sandbox. I set my subscription to "Remove from Sale" for all territories in App Store Connect, but I can still make new purchases and auto-renewals continue in the Sandbox environment. Is this a known limitation? Or is there a specific way to make this work for testing? If it can't be tested, I'd like to know the expected production behavior. What changes occur in the App Receipt and what App Store Server Notification is sent?

Hello, I am setting up an auto-renewable subscription for my iOS app in App Store Connect. I would like to set the monthly subscription price to ¥710 (Japanese yen). From what I understand, Apple requires us to use predefined price tiers for in-app purchases and subscriptions. However, I’m not sure whether subscriptions allow more flexibility than one-time in-app purchases. 👉 My questions are: Is it possible to set an arbitrary subscription price such as ¥710, or must I pick the closest price tier from Apple’s official subscription price list? If arbitrary prices are not allowed, is there an official list of available subscription price points for Japan that I can refer to? Can we set subscription prices in multiples of 10 yen (e.g., ¥700, ¥710, ¥720), or are we strictly limited to the price points Apple provides? Thank you in advance for your help!

Now I’m testing in-app purchase for my app but I can’t find how to set up my snadbox account in tvOS. Acoording to Apple support team, the following menu item should be available in the settings; Settings &gt; Users and Accounts &gt; Sandbox Account But it’s not the case for me even I activated develope mode in tvOS already. Can anyone explain how to set up sandbox account in tvOS or how to activate the menu above? Thanks in advance.

Hi，I am facing the 21002 issue.Have you went through it? If you have resolved it, please dive me a hand. Below is my code,and I Have tested in sand box environment. NSURL receiptURL = [[NSBundle mainBundle] appStoreReceiptURL]; if (![[NSFileManager defaultManager] fileExistsAtPath:[receiptURL path]]) { SKReceiptRefreshRequest receiptRefreshRequest = [[SKReceiptRefreshRequest alloc] initWithReceiptProperties:nil]; receiptRefreshRequest.delegate = self; [receiptRefreshRequest start]; return; } NSData data = [NSData dataWithContentsOfURL:receiptURL]; / receipt_data/ NSString *receipt_data = [data base64EncodedStringWithOptions:0]; After I test the purchase procedure, use the above receipt-data to verify on the server https://sandbox.itunes.apple.com/verifyReceipt,which always response 21002.I have no idea to deal with it.Thanks.

Hello everyone, I’ve been struggling with App Store Review regarding my delivery app, and I’m hoping someone here can shed light on whether my app actually requires In-App Purchase (IAP) under Apple’s guidelines. Here’s my situation: My app connects riders with delivery jobs. We have two rider payment models: Commission Plan (10%) – Riders don’t pay upfront, but 10% is deducted per completed delivery. Fixed Subscription Plan – Riders pay a fixed monthly fee in advance, which allows them to keep 100% of their delivery earnings. The challenge: Apple Review has rejected my app multiple times, insisting that I must use IAP for these payments. I’ve written back and forth with them several times explaining that: The commission plan isn’t a digital feature, it’s simply a revenue share from physical delivery work. The fixed plan is more like a business service fee for using the platform, not for unlocking content or digital features. Despite this, the Review Team continues to state that my app “requires IAP.” My questions are: Based on Apple’s official guidelines, do apps like mine (delivery/logistics with commission/subscription for riders) really fall under IAP rules? Has anyone here had a similar issue with a marketplace or service-based app? If this does require IAP, what’s the reasoning — since the payments are tied to real-world services, not digital content? I’d appreciate advice, shared experiences, or even clarification from someone who has successfully passed review with a similar model. Thanks in advance!

hello, I have an app with In-App purchase set up, it works fine in TestFlight on an iOS device but the download from the App Store gives me a transaction failed message. I tried to replicate in the simulator but from what I've read is that you can't do in-app purchase testing in the simulator. Perhaps I'm wrong here but I've tried multiple sandbox accounts, etc.. and still get an unusual "...password can't be reused..." error (pasted below) in the debug description. I'm curious if anyone else has dealt with this scenario and if so how did you go about researching/identifying the issue and/or resolving it. Partial error message: <SKPaymentQueue: 0x60000000e370>: Payment completed with error: Error Domain=ASDErrorDomain Code=530 "(null)" UserInfo={NSUnderlyingError=0x600000c74750 {Error Domain=AMSErrorDomain Code=100 "Authentication Failed The authentication failed." UserInfo={NSMultipleUnderlyingErrorsKey=( "Error Domain=AMSErrorDomain Code=2 "Password reuse not available for account The account state does not support password reuse." UserInfo={NSDebugDescription=Password reuse not available for account The account state does not support password reuse., AMSDescription=Password reuse not available for account, AMSFailureReason=The account state does not support password reuse.}"

Hello everyone, I’m currently working on an iOS app built with Capacitor(5.0.6) with Cordova and vanilla JS. At the moment, my app uses Stripe to handle payments — on iOS I open a Safari View Controller so users can pay with Apple Pay or their credit card. However, I need to migrate to Apple’s In-App Purchase system to comply with App Store policies. I would really appreciate some guidance or a step-by-step outline on the following: The exact process to enable and configure In-App Purchases in Xcode and App Store Connect for a Capacitor-based app. How to properly set up local testing with StoreKit (or any other recommended approach) before submitting to review. Best practices for integrating In-App Purchases when using RevenueCat, since I’m considering it to simplify the implementation. Any pitfalls or gotchas that I should be aware of during the first submission (for example, the requirement to include the first IAP with a new app version). My goal is to fully comply with Apple’s policies and provide a smooth user experience for iOS users. I’m open to suggestions on frameworks, workflows, or tools that could make this easier. Thank you in advance for any help or examples you can share!

Guideline 3.1.1 - Business - Payments - In-App Purchase, as my app currently allows users to purchase digital content (courses) using an external payment system. I am working to comply with Apple’s requirements by integrating In-App Purchase for all digital content within the app. My app contains approximately 100,000 individual courses, and I am seeking guidance on how to effectively implement In-App Purchase for such a large number of items. Creating 100,000 separate In-App Purchase products in App Store Connect seems impractical due to the scale and potential limitations. I would like to explore feasible solutions, such as: Using a subscription model to provide access to all courses. Creating category-based bundles (e.g., Programming, Design) to group courses. Implementing a dynamic purchase system where users can select specific courses after a single In-App Purchase transaction, managed server-side. Could you please advise on the best approach to manage In-App Purchase for 100,000 individual courses? I am happy to provide additional details about my app’s functionality or work with your team to ensure compliance. Please let me know if a consultation or further documentation is needed to proceed. Looking forward to your guidance. Best regards, Shuvajit Maitra

If I have a subscription based app that's available on iOS, Android, and the web.I use the appropriate billing systems for each platform (Apple IAP for iOS, Google Play Billing for Android, and my own system for web) What happens when a user subscribes on Android or the web, then logs into the same account on the iOS app? Am I allowed to honor that existing subscription on iOS, or am I required to have them purchase a separate subscription through Apple’s in app purchase system in order to access premium features on the iOS app?

If I have an app available on IOS/Android/Web and offer subscriptions in each (Obviously using apple IAP / Google Play Billing when in those contexts) and a user creates an account on Android / Web and pays for that subscription and then logs in with the same account on the App Store, do I need to charge them again for a new subscription, or can I use their account subscription?

Hi everyone, After my app was initially rejected, all my IAPs now show the status “Developer Action Needed.” There’s nothing I need to change on them — they were just returned because it was the first submission and the app itself was rejected. Do I need to do anything with the IAPs before I resubmit, or will they still be attached and reviewed automatically with the next binary? I’ve seen conflicting answers, so I’d like to confirm the correct process. Thanks, Cris