Search results for

ITMS-90158

1,681 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to What can trigger "App uses the itms-services URL scheme to install an app" rejection?
Hi, Unfortunately I have no solutions to offer but I just wanted to add a comment that I'm facing the same issue with my application. I'm not using itms-services URL at all and am certainly not intentionally trying to install another app. I have a previous version approved on Testflight but can't get my latest version approved due to this issue. When I replied to the App Review, I received the same reply of 'no further information can be provided' so I don't really know what else I am to do. It's a really frustrating experience to have your app rejected and then when you try to resolve the issue, getting told we can't tell you where you did this, but we definitely saw it somewhere.
Jun ’24
Invalid binary when submitting a build to appstore connect
When I send a build in Xcode the process occurs normally, but a few minutes later I receive an e-mail saying: ITMS-90683: Missing purpose string in Info.plist - Your app’s code references one or more APIs that access sensitive user data, or the app has one or more entitlements that permit such access. The Info.plist file for the “xxx.app” bundle should contain a NSMicrophoneUsageDescription key with a user-facing purpose string explaining clearly and completely why your app needs the data. If you’re using external libraries or SDKs, they may reference APIs that require a purpose string. While your app might not use these APIs, a purpose string is still required. So the problem is the description of the use of the microphone, right? As the attached image shows that I have already done this process, and I continue to receive this error. Even when I remove the part of the avfoundation code that uses the microphone to try to submit the build, the error continues to be returned to me
1
0
736
Jun ’24
ITMS-90863: Macs with Apple silicon support issue (iCloud library)
Recently I started getting emails from AppStoreConnect when I submit new builds The email states: ITMS-90863: Macs with Apple silicon support issue - The app links with libraries that aren’t present in macOS: /usr/lib/swift/libswiftCloudKit.dylib I can run this app on apple silicon from TestFlight or directly from Xcode and it runs just fine including all iCloud functions. This app has been using iCloud for several years now. So my question is: Should I just ignore the email or do I need to change something to bring this app into compliance?
9
0
3.4k
Jun ’24
Can't submit new app to Appstore
Hey! Since thursday we are have problem that we can not submit new builds on app store. This is the error we are getting: ITMS-90338: Non-public API usage - The app references non-public selectors in Frameworks/UnityFramework.framework/UnityFramework: initWithImageData:. If method names in your source code match the private Apple APIs listed above, altering your method names will help prevent this app from being flagged in future submissions. In addition, note that one or more of the above APIs may be located in a static library that was included with your app. If so, they must be removed. For further information, visit the Technical Support Information at http://developer.apple.com/support/technical/ App validates fine in xcode before uploading, but after uploading we get this error, any suggestions what to do?
1
0
522
May ’24
How to define http proxy for Xcode 15 ?
with Xcode 14 I can modify this file : /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/SharedFrameworks/ContentDeliveryServices.framework/Versions/A/itms/java/conf/net.properties and set the following property to true ( false by default ) java.net.useSystemProxies=true but with Xcode 15, I don't found any documentation
0
0
435
May ’24
About ITMS-91065
In order to facilitate management, we integrate some SDKs such as Firebase into one of our own internally used SDKs. Recently, when submitted to the appstore, we were prompted that FirebaseCrashing included in the SDK lacked the necessary signature (ITMS-91065). The information that can be confirmed is that after packaging the SDK through secondary packaging, the original signature is lost. And we have a static reference. So what I want to ask is whether we can only manually sign our secondary packaging sdk (the signature is our own certificate different from the original Firebase) to solve this ITMS-91065 problem. According to the description of the Apple Developer Conference, Apple only verifies the consistency and security of the SDK and does not record the signature of each SDK on Apple's servers. Therefore, you should only need to ensure that the SDK is in a signed state to comply with Apple's review requirements. (My guess is still being verified)
2
0
2.0k
May ’24
Asset validation failed (90085): Static Framework Embedded in Dynamic Framework
One of our apps got hit by the ITMS-91065: Missing Signature issue when we attempted to distribute it to externally via TestFlight. The email said FirebaseCore is missing the signature file within our own framework. After investigation, I realized our recent update to the version of Firebase that has the proper signatures and privacy manifest wasn't enough by itself. Similar to Apple's own instructions on embedding static frameworks since Xcode 15, Firebase instructs us to select the Embed & Sign option. After making the appropriate changes though, we're getting the error in Transporter: Asset validation failed (90085): No architectures in the binary Our setup is as follows: We have an analytics dynamic framework, which depends on Firebase's static framework. The Firebase related frameworks are embedded and signed in our analytics framework. Our app depends on the analytics dynamic framework, which now includes Firebase frameworks within its framework. Since the Firebase frameworks are static, on
1
0
1.2k
May ’24
Reply to libswift ITMS-91055: Invalid API reason declaration
Hello, which version of xcode are you using ? I have the same issue here : ITMS-91055: Invalid API reason declaration - The PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy for the “Frameworks/libswiftAssetsLibrary.dylib” file contains “85F4.1” as the value for a NSPrivacyAccessedAPITypeReasons key instead of a valid reason code for using an API in the NSPrivacyAccessedAPICategoryUserDefaults category. Values for NSPrivacyAccessedAPITypeReasons keys in any privacy manifest must be valid reason codes for the corresponding API category. For more details about this policy, including a list of required reason APIs and approved reasons for usage, visit: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/privacy_manifest_files/describing_use_of_required_reason_api. Here the message i have for several items I have tried to embed those with my app but it does not help. Here is my privacy file Thanks in advance :)
May ’24
The SwiftSupport folder is missing
Hi, I have been receiving an email error message: ITMS-90426: Invalid Swift Support - The SwiftSupport folder is missing. Rebuild your app using the current public (GM) version of Xcode and resubmit it. when submitting an app to the App Store Connect using xcode. I have searched for many solutions online, but none of them have worked. Later, I manually created the SwiftSupport directory and copied the Swift dynamic library (dylib) that the app depends on to this directory, as well as copying them to the. app/Frameworks directory. After submitting, I received an email saying that these. dylib dynamic libraries are not in the. app/Frameworks directory. I opened the IPA file and checked the directory, and I really saw that they are located below. I don't know where the problem is, can you tell me the exact reason?
0
0
933
May ’24
What can trigger "App uses the itms-services URL scheme to install an app" rejection?
I'm an indie developer. My latest minor update for my game which has been on the Mac App Store for 13 years and which has spent time at #1 on the download charts just started getting rejected for the following reason: Guideline 2.5.2 - Performance - Software Requirements The app installed or launched executable code. Specifically, the app uses the itms-services URL scheme to install an app. However my app is certainly not installing any apps and to the best of my knowlege it is not using any itms/itunes/etc. type URLs in any way, so I can't figure out what would be triggering this claim. Inquiries as to what app I am supposedly installing or what URL I am supposedly using have yielded 'no further information can be provided'. Has anyone run into something similar? Any ideas on obscure scenarios that could trigger this particular rejection? Or any advice on what one should do in my situation? I feel a bit stuck. Has anyone had luck with the appeal process for this sort of thing (to at least g
3
0
1.3k
May ’24
ITMS-90714: Invalid binary - The app contains one or more corrupted binaries. Please rebuild the app and resubmit.
While uploading the application into the TestFlight the following error received, ITMS-90714: Invalid binary - The app contains one or more corrupted binaries. Please rebuild the app and resubmit. After sometimes generate same configuration the application successfully submitted on the TestFlight. We are using Xcode 15.3
4
0
1.5k
May ’24
ITMS - 90714 Invalid Binary Error occurred while upload the app into TestFlight
We are received the following error while uploading the application into TestFlight. **ITMS-90714: Invalid binary - The app contains one or more corrupted binaries. Please rebuild the app and resubmit. ** After sometimes we submit the same application without changing the configurations application submitted successfully into the App Store. We are using the Xcode 15.3 version.
3
0
1.2k
May ’24
iOS ITMS-90013: Corrupt Image File image file 'AppIcon60x60@2x.png
After uploading a new iOS build, we received an error message via email from Apple stating: ITMS-90013: Corrupt Image File - The image file AppIcon60x60 2x.png appears to be corrupt. Strangely, we don't have any image file with that name in our project. It seems to be a build processing error on Apple's side. While I've seen similar issues reported for Apple TV in the past, this is happening with our iOS build. Has anyone discovered a workaround? I've uploaded another app build and haven't encountered any errors.
4
0
2.2k
May ’24
Corrupt Image file when uploading to testflight
Hi, our app has been using single size app icon for a while and today when I trying to upload a new version of our app I got an email from App Store Connect saying ITMS-90013: Corrupt Image File - The image file 'AppIcon60x60@2x.png' appears to be corrupt. We haven't touched the image for ages and these 60x60 image were generated by Xcode from the single 1024x1024 image supplied. I've tried to use a new image and still got the same error. Does anyone experienced this recently?
2
0
605
May ’24
Reply to Apple TV - ITMS 90013 - Corrupt Image File
I just got this error too even though 1) our app icons haven't changed for a long time and many previous builds have been accepted with the same icon set 2) they all render fine in Xcode and 3) I checked the icon locally and the PNG file renders fine. This is the error message in my case: ITMS-90013: Corrupt Image File - The image file 'AppIcon60x60[@]2x.png' appears to be corrupt. I reached out to Apple to see if they have a problem with their backend. Note I enclosed the @ symbol with square brackets so the forum allows me to post this message.
May ’24