In iOS 18, TabView with .tabViewStyle(.sidebarAdaptable) introduced a powerful adaptive pattern — tabs in compact, sidebar in regular. However, the current Tab API only supports a title and an image (icon). There is no way to provide a trailing accessory view (e.g., a secondary icon or indicator) for sidebar rows. This is a meaningful gap in the API, because trailing accessories are a well-established pattern throughout UIKit and SwiftUI. Precedent in Apple's own design language Apple already supports trailing accessories in many analogous contexts: UITableViewCell / UICollectionViewListCell — support accessories (disclosure indicators, checkmarks, custom views) via UICellAccessory. UIListContentConfiguration — allows leading and trailing content in list rows. SwiftUI List rows — support Label, HStack with trailing elements, .badge(), and swipeActions. NavigationLink — automatically renders a disclosure chevron as a trailing accessory. UITabSidebarItem (UIKit, iOS 18) — supports configuratio
Search results for
Building for iOS Simulator, but the linked and embedded framework ‘XX.framework‘ was built for
186,299 results found
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Hi everyone, I would like to know how I can get invite with a link to use testflight app. thanks
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
Apple Developer Program
With the help of Claude and Codex, I've tried upgrading a screen magnification, capture, and pixel peeping app (SnoopX, from Stanford's software repository) to be HDR-aware. For images that are truly HDR (displayed in Apple Photos, Google Photos in Chrome, or Mac Preview), and on an HDR monitor with plenty of EDR headroom (Apple XDR display), I should see pixel values well above 1.0. Apple's Digital Color Meter does. However, my app does not. I think the code is doing all the right things with ScreenCaptureKit, but it never returns values above 1.0. Has anybody gotten this to work? Here is what Codex says about the code it helped me build in my app: • Set captureDynamicRange: We set config.captureDynamicRange = SCCaptureDynamicRangeHDRLocalDisplay (when available). Note: Gemini’s SCCaptureModeHDRLocalDisplay isn’t a real symbol — the actual API is SCCaptureDynamicRange. • Use preset: We try initWithPreset: SCStreamConfigurationPresetCaptureHDRStreamLocalDisplay, but your runtime crashes on initWithPr
We have been using this API call to set the In-App Provisioning capability for 2+ years and it just recently started returning errors. To set the In-App Provisioning capability we had been using the App Store Connect API directly: curl https://api.appstoreconnect.apple.com/v1/bundleIdCapabilities -X POST --header Authorization: Bearer #{appleApiToken} --header Content-Type: application/json -d '{data: {type: bundleIdCapabilities, attributes: {capabilityType: IN_APP_PASS_PROVISIONING}, relationships: {bundleId: {data: {id: #{appStoreBundleIdentifier}, type: bundleIds}}}}}' The IN_APP_PASS_PROVISIONING capability type is shown, by getting the bundle ID capabilities, when In-App Provisioning is set on a bundle ID: curl https://api.appstoreconnect.apple.com/v1/bundleIds/#{appStoreBundleIdentifier}/bundleIdCapabilities --header Authorization: Bearer #{appleApiToken} After manually setting the In-App Provisioning capability via the Apple Developer portal you will see the new capabilityType: { type : bundleIdCapabi
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Store Connect API
Follow up with solution to the OTA installation error Cannot connect to.... It was not due to the distribution certificate being for iOS. visionOS required the platform-identifier key in the manifest.plist to be in the assets section. Our platform-identifier has always been in the metadata section but visionOS seems to be more picky.
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
On our public Apple account we have distribution certificates that work for all Apple platforms. On our Enterprise account it will only generate iOS distribution certificates. Apple support did not provide any concrete solutions, only pointing us to the general docs. Any suggestions?
I think that should be fine (based on what I've seen from previous submissions). You can design a combined image showing the app running on those devices to highlight the responsive layout, as long as the screenshots accurately reflect the actual UI of your app submission. The key point is that the images must be real screenshots of the app as built, not mockups or concepts that differ from the submitted version.
Topic:
Community
SubTopic:
Swift Student Challenge
Tags:
Sorry I mised your earlier response. It’s better to reply as a reply, rather than in the comments; see Quinn’s Top Ten DevForums Tips for this and other titbits. This suggests that while UDP packets reach the device, delivery to the process is suspended in background, which explains why the DTLS handshake cannot progress. Indeed. This is pretty fundamental to how iOS works. If your app moves to the background, iOS suspends it. It then can’t do anything until it gets resumed. It’ll be resumed when your app moves to the foreground. It can also be resumed in the background under specific criteria. However, traffic on a UDP socket is not one of those criteria. I talk more about this in iOS Background Execution Limits. Traditionally, VoIP apps use two different techniques for these two scenarios: For ring indication, they use one of the technologies that Kevin described above (VoIP push or Local push connectivity). For the actual conversation, they prevent the app from suspending by virt
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
Networking
Tags:
Hello, We are facing an issue with performing a DTLS handshake when our iOS application is in the background. Our app (Vocera Collaboration Suite – VCS) uses secure DTLS-encrypted communication for incoming VoIP calls. Problem Summary: When the app is in the background and a VoIP PushKit notification arrives, we attempt to establish a DTLS handshake over our existing socket. However, the handshake consistently fails unless the app is already in the foreground. Once the app is foregrounded, the same DTLS handshake logic succeeds immediately. Key Questions: Is performing a DTLS handshake while the app is in the background technically supported by iOS? Or is this an OS-level limitation by design? If not supported, what is the Apple-recommended alternative to establish secure DTLS communication for VoIP flows without bringing the app to the foreground? Any guidance or clarification from Apple engineers or anyone who has solved a similar problem would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Hi everyone, I’m implementing subscriptions using StoreKit v2, and I’ve noticed a behavior change starting with iOS 26.1. I’d like to ask if anyone else has experienced the same issue. ■ Issue Immediately after purchasing a new subscription, the value of auto_renew_status (or autoRenewStatus) returned in the receipt is 0 (auto-renew OFF). This issue occurs on iOS 26.1. On iOS 26.0 and earlier, the same parameter returned 1 (auto-renew ON) right after purchase. Sometimes, after executing a “restore” operation, the value changes to 1 later. Since we’ve been using this parameter to determine whether a user’s subscription is active or not, the current behavior is causing some difficulties on our end. ■ Questions Has anyone else observed this issue (where autoRenewStatus is 0 immediately after purchase on iOS 26.1 or later)? How are you handling or working around this behavior in your implementation? If autoRenewStatus is unreliable, we’re considering determining the subscriptio
I can confirm that on the app side since iOS 26.1 we are observing same behavior: try await product.purchase(options: options) returns .success transaction under .verified result has productType == .autoRenewable but await transaction.subscriptionStatus returns nil According the documentation it shouldn't happen: @available(iOS 15.0, macOS 12.0, tvOS 15.0, watchOS 8.0, visionOS 1.0, *) extension Transaction { /// The full subscription status for the transaction. /// /// If the transaction is not for a subscription (i.e. ``Transaction/productType`` is not /// ``Product/ProductType/autoRenewable``), the value will always be `nil`. The value /// may be `nil` if there is an error retrieving the subscription status. /// /// - Note: The value's ``Product/SubscriptionInfo/Status/transaction`` property /// represents the latest transaction for the subscription, which is not necessarily the same /// as this transaction. @available(iOS 15.0, macOS 12.0, tvOS 15.0, watchOS 8.0, visionOS 1.0, *
Topic:
App & System Services
SubTopic:
StoreKit
Tags:
Hello everyone, I’m currently experiencing unusually long wait times for app reviews and wanted to check if others are seeing similar delays this week. Here is the current status of my submissions: App Store Update: Stuck in Waiting for Review much longer than the typical 24–48 hour window. New Version: A newly submitted version also seems to be stalled in the initial phase. TestFlight Processing: Even TestFlight builds are taking longer than usual to process. Expedited Review: I've attempted an expedited review request and direct communication, but the status remains unchanged so far. What’s confusing is that I see other apps in the same category receiving updates, so I’m unsure if this is a localized technical glitch or a broader delay affecting a specific group of developers. I’m not looking to escalate anything just yet; I’m simply trying to gauge if this is a widespread issue at the moment. I would greatly appreciate any insights into your recent experiences or if you've noticed similar patterns
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Review
Hi, After the release of macOS Tahoe 26.2. We are seeing memory leaks if our Network Protection Extension is used alongside the Apple Built In Firewall, a second Security Solution that does Network Protection and a VPN. Our NEXT, socketfilterfw and the other security solution consume instead of a few MB of Memory now multiple Gigabytes of Memory. This issue started with the public release of macOS Tahoe 26.2, this issue was not present in earlier versions of macOS and the same set of Software. Just testing our solution by itself will not show this behavior. I unfortunately can't try to reproduce the issue on my test device that runs the latest 26.3 beta as I do not have the third party software installed there and I can't get it. Our Network extension implements depending on the license and enabled features: NEFilterDataProvider NEDNSProxyProvider NETransparentProxyProvider For all man in the middle Use Cases we are using Network Framework, to communicate with the peers. And leaks suggest th
[quote='876600022, anosidium, /thread/815819?answerId=876600022#876600022, /profile/anosidium'] You advised that I should enable all the settings. [/quote] Well, yes, if you read that one sentence in isolation. However, I made it clear that one specific setting, Enable Soft Mode for Memory Tagging, reduces security, so if you goal is security then enabling that is probably not a good choice (-: [quote='876600022, anosidium, /thread/815819?answerId=876600022#876600022, /profile/anosidium'] I am therefore inclined not to enable it. [/quote] Or you could profile your app and see if it makes a difference in pratice. That’s generally the best way to approach performance trade-offs. [quote='876600022, anosidium, /thread/815819?answerId=876600022#876600022, /profile/anosidium'] I am not entirely sure what is meant by logging in [Soft Mode] [/quote] Quoting Enabling enhanced security for your app: This entitlement makes hardware memory tagging operate in soft mode, where the system produces a simulated crash
Topic:
Privacy & Security
SubTopic:
General
Tags:
Hello, guys. I am going through a situation in which an open validation appears in the system/developer mode and I would like to understand better if this is something normal in this process. Could someone confirm if this type of validation is expected at this stage? I would also like to know what criteria I can observe to be sure that it is legitimate and that I can trust the activation. Thank you in advance for your attention and help. Thank you