Hello Apple Developer Community, We have been experiencing a persistent notification issue in our application, Flowace, after updating to macOS 15 and above. The issue is affecting our customers but does not occur on our internal test machines. Issue Description When users share their screen using Flowace, they receive a repetitive system notification stating: "Flowace has accessed your screen and system audio XX times in the past 30 days. You can manage this in settings." This pop-up appears approximately every minute, even though screen sharing and audio access work correctly. This behavior was not present in macOS 15.1.1 or earlier versions and appears to be related to recent privacy enhancements in macOS. Impact on Users The frequent pop-ups disrupt workflows, making it difficult for users to focus while using screen-sharing features. No issues are detected in Privacy & Security Settings, where Flowace has the necessary permissions. The issue is not reproducible on our internal test machines, making troubleshooting difficult. Our application is enterprise level and works all the time, so technically this pop only comes after a period of not using the app. Request for Assistance We would like to understand: Has anyone else encountered a similar issue in macOS 15+? Is there official Apple documentation explaining this new privacy behavior? Are there any interim fixes to suppress or manage these notifications? What are Apple's prospects regarding this feature in upcoming macOS updates? A demonstration of the issue can be seen in the following video: https://youtu.be/njA6mam_Bgw Any insights, workarounds, or recommendations would be highly appreciated! Thank you in advance for your help. Best, Anuj Patil Flowace Team

Summary Recently a number of bugs affecting our Safari extension have been introduced with various Safari 18.X updates. We've submitted feedback for all of these, but most have received no response. We need to raise this to your attention as it has been affecting our developer experience and causing a lot of frustration for our users. It's something that adds a lot of uncertainty for us. These issues affect core web functionalities but seem to be isolated to the Start Page or Extension environments. For example: using window.open, no longer works using window.location.href = ... no longer works Including a tag in our start page causes infinite reloading to occur. registering a content script more than once will crash Safari Details Unable to open new window as as start page extension in Safari 18 FB15879470 What happens: Calling window.open does nothing. This broke our links to our feedback submission, marketing site & help site. When: Nov 18, 2024 - Initial launch of Safari 18 on macOS Status: Open, No response Unable to open app url scheme with window.location.href in start page extension in iOS 18 FB15879596 What happens: Changing the URL in this way does nothing (well actually it does work about 10% of the time). This broke our navigation to in app payment. When: Nov 18, 2024 - Initial launch of Safari 18 on iOS Status: Open, No response New tab extensions broken FB16126043 What happens: Having a tag in your causes an infinite loop of reloading the start page. This broke our entire start page extension. When: Dec 19, 2024 - Safari 18.3 on iOS beta Status: 10 similar tickets found, marked for future OS update. We did get a response and a fix is identified for a future release window.open opens “about:blank” when called from Start Page extension. FB16427985 What happens: calling window.open from the start page opens about blank on iOS 18.3. Similar to the first issue, but slightly different behaviour. This broke our links to our feedback submission, marketing site & help site. When: Jan 30, 2025 - Safari 18.3 Status: Open, No response Registering a content script more than once causes Safari to crash in macOS 15.4 beta FB16831768 What happens: We have an optional content script that we were registering every time it was used. Although somewhat redundant, it was much simpler than checking if one was already registered and tracking if an updated one needed to replace it. This works fine on all other browsers and all prior Safari versions we've released it on. However if a user enables site blocker on the latest version, as soon as they visit any website, our content script registration causes Safari to crash. Essentially preventing users from using Safari until they uninstall our extension. When: Mar 11, 2025 - Safari 18.4 Status: Open, No response In Conclusion Luckily we have been able to isolate and find workarounds for most of these issues so far, but we are not guaranteed to in the future. We are raising this not only to have these issues looked into, but to raise awareness of the rising trend of basic functionality of Safari extensions breaking with Safari updates. We hope that this can influence a shift in your QA & feedback intake practices to ensure these issues are less frequent in the future. We are happy to raise future issues through your provided channels as they are discovered. But to have our feedback ignored and then have to rely solely on workarounds to prevent disruptions to our users' experience is concerning. We submitted this feedback to our developer relations contact, and he suggested we submit a TSI to look into these issues. In response to this, we were advised to post this here.

Implementing ACL support in a distributed filesystem, with macOS and Linux clients talking to a remote file server, requires compatibility between the ACL models supported in Darwin-XNU and Linux kernels to be taken into consideration. My filesystem does support EAs to facilitate ACL storage and retrieval. So setting ACLs via chmod(1) and retrieving them via ls(1) does work. However, the macOS and Linux ACL models are incompatible and would require some sort of conversion between them. chmod(1) uses acl(3) to create ACL entries. While acl(3) claims to implement POSIX.1e ACL security API, which, to the best of my knowledge, Linux VFS implements as well, their respective implementations of the standard obviously do differ. Which is also stated in acl(3): This implementation of the POSIX.1e library differs from the standard in a number of non-portable ways in order to support the MacOS/Darwin ACL semantic. Then there's this NFSv4 to POSIX ACL mapping draft that describes the conversion algorithm. What's the recommended way to bridge the compatibility gap there, so that macOS ACL rules are honoured in Linux and vice versa? Thanks.

Hi, trying to upgrade from macOS Sequoia 15.3.2 to 15.4 gives this error. Now I can not boot from internal drive of M1 Air 2020, because it restores 15.4, that does not boot. I can only boot from external USB SSD that has macOS 15.3.2. How I can install back 15.3.2 or alternatively newer macOS to internal drive? I only have one Mac, this M1 Air 2020. I have AppleAppleCare+ to 9/18/25. Remaining of error is attached here: Can't ignore lock validation @t8020dart.c:535 panic(cpu 2 caller 0x0): t8020dart 0xfffffdf053908000 (dart-dispext0): Can't ignore lock validation @t8020dart.c:535 Debugger message: panic Memory ID: 0x6 OS release type: Not set yet OS version: Not set yet Kernel version: Darwin Kernel Version 24.4.0: Wed Mar 19 21:12:54 PDT 2025; root:xnu-11417.101.15~1/RELEASE_ARM64_T8103 Fileset Kernelcache UUID: 2BBA525B95E0E6B962ECC44FC093AB57 Kernel UUID: 4E6CBD31-CD1E-3939-8A63-211A206AFA66 Boot session UUID: 3A34167D-2534-402F-9679-2CAD45F67CDA iBoot version: iBoot-11881.101.1 iBoot Stage 2 version: iBoot-11881.101.1 secure boot?: YES

Hello, is there a way to implement Continuity Markup in our own apps? (This is what I'm talking about: https://support.apple.com/en-us/102269 , scroll down to "Use Continuity Markup"). Also, why does a QuickLook panel (QLPreviewPanel.shared()) not display the markup options when triggered from my app for png image files in my app's Group Container? Do I need to implement certain NSServicesMenuRequestor methods for that? Sadly, I could not find any docs on that. Thank you, – Matthias

I am developing a React Native app for a health monitoring device that connects via Bluetooth and streams live data on iOS. To ensure the uniqueness of the device, I initially planned to use the MAC address. However, I discovered that iOS does not provide access to the original MAC address due to privacy restrictions. Is there an alternative approach to uniquely identifying a Bluetooth device in iOS? I need a reliable way to distinguish devices while maintaining secure and stable connections. Any insights or best practices on handling this in iOS would be greatly appreciated. Looking forward to hearing your suggestions! If anyone has experience with handling Bluetooth device uniqueness on iOS, please share your insights. Thank you!