Search results for

“missing package product”

52,398 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Waiting Over A Month For Review
As the title suggests, I've been waiting over a month for a review. Testing patience to say the least when the official word is less than 72 hours.. What is going on? The version in review is now out of date as I've developed features quicker than Apple has been able to review them, yet I daren't remove the app from review as I'll lose my place in the queue. So even when/if it gets approved, I'll immediately have to add a new version for review. What a farce. Submission ID 994fa30a-92a6-4923-8cc8-b94090986b39
5
0
120
1w
Missing DirectX Calls for Tearing and Depth Bound Test in D3DMetal and GPTK 3
I want to address the missing or incomplete DirectX calls from D3DMetal and Game Porting Toolkit 3. These missing calls have in part caused issue with our porting process and we are reconsidering. Missing or Incomplete Calls DXGI_FEATURE_PRESENT_ALLOW_TEARING — IDXGIFactory5::CheckFeatureSupport — this calls has to do with how VSync is handled and some modern games require it to initialize. Currently D3DMetal return 0 maybe by design but most likely because it’s not integrated. Adding a stub that returns 1 can fix this. I’m my use case I simply Noped the check and forced it to continue. D3D12_FEATURE_D3D12_OPTIONS2.DepthBoundsTestSupported — this call is also not present. Which causes games to not initialize rendering. Thankfully this was fixed by once again skipping the check. But this is essential for water rendering. This could be one reason currently water is not rendering in our game. IDXGIOutput6::GetDesc1().ColorSpace — returns DXGI_COLOR_SPACE_RGB_FULL_G22_NONE_P709 (SDR) on
5
0
231
1w
SPM Failed to verified fingerprint for SSH url since Tahoe 26.3
Hi there, I recently updated to the latest version of macOS Tahoe 26.3. Since then, Xcode is not able to resolve my Swift Package dependencies anymore. We use SSH for all our Github hosted packages. When package resolution is running, we randomly have Failed to verify SSH fingerprint on some remote package. Nothing has changed and it worked perfectly with Tahoe 26.2. The SSH have been reconfigured and known hosts have been verified. Is something changed between those 2 versions or is it a bug ?
16
0
2.3k
1w
iOS 26 Regression: Screen Time Permission Lost, had to be re-authenticated
Hello, my app is frequently loosing / forgetting the Screen Time Permission that had been granted previously on iOS 26. I have experienced it myself, sysdiagnose is in this radar: FB18997699 But also also my App Store users who have updated to iOS 26 already have reported this bug. It would be great if Apple could ensure that this bug is addressed before iOS 26 is released to the public.
3
0
377
1w
App Transfer Completed but Extension App IDs Missing and Cannot Be Recreated
Hello, We recently transferred our iOS app to a new Apple Developer account, and we are experiencing an issue that is currently blocking our release. The transfer of the main app appears to have completed successfully: The app is visible in App Store Connect under the recipient account The main bundle ID is available However, the App IDs for our extensions are missing from the recipient account in Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles. Affected bundle identifiers: com.finanfut.finanfut.NotificationService com.finanfut.finanfut.NotificationContentExtension The issue is: These App IDs do NOT appear in the recipient account We are NOT able to create them manually Apple returns: “The app identifier is not available” As a result: Xcode cannot generate provisioning profiles We get errors like: No profiles for 'com.finanfut.finanfut.NotificationContentExtension' were found We are blocked from archiving and distributing the app It seems that the App IDs are still reserved in Apple's backend but were not p
2
0
46
1w
Reply to 26.4 beta and RC versions are unable to be created on anything but 26.4 beta host OS
During the beta cycle, developers can get the required MobileDevice by installing the latest Xcode seed. That's problematic on macOS 15.x because Xcode 26.4 now requires macOS 26.2. However, would it be possible to open the Xcode.app/Contents/Resources/Packages/MobileDevice.pkg manually on a macOS 15.x machine to get the required mobile device files? Once the OS is released, either: That doesn't seem to match my experience. macOS 26.4 is now out, and I've updated to macOS 15.7.5 (24G624), but when I try using the restore image of the release version of macOS 26.4 to make a VM, I'm still prompted to install the mobile device files and it still says that they aren't available from the software update server.
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
1w
Reply to UK TAX INFO - alternative terms addendum - showing under tax forms with no visible agreement
Have the exact same issue for a few months now with no help from support. I also do not use any alternative app store payments or alternative terms, neither do I have a VAT number. And because of this it's also now unable to submit apps with IAP. I have this on my account for 3 months now: Add Missing Tax Info To ensure your account is taxed accurately or avoid losing access to some App Store Connect features, complete tax form(s) below with missing information. I requested to remove it which they are supposed to remove within one month. I have at this point had to raise the issue with the ccpc (Competition and Consumer Protection Commission) in Ireland as it seems legal route is the only way forward. Have had countless cases open with apple dev support, finance, etc. Yet noone has an answer nor taken any action.
1w
UK TAX INFO - alternative terms addendum - showing under tax forms with no visible agreement
Hello everyone, I’m facing a confusing issue in App Store Connect and hoping someone here has encountered this before. Context: • Company developer account (UK-based) • App is free to download • Only optional In-App Purchases (Apple IAP) • No external payments • Using standard App Store distribution • Paid Apps agreement is active • US tax forms (W-8BEN-E) are active Issue: Under Agreements → Tax Forms, I see: United Kingdom Tax Info – Alternative Terms Addendum – Missing Tax Info However: • There is no Alternative Terms Addendum visible under Agreements • I have not intentionally opted into EU DMA Alternative Terms • I do not have a UK VAT number (Apple should be Merchant of Record under standard IAP) Finance Support says they do not support Alternative Terms. Agreements support has not responded yet. Questions: 1. Can the Alternative Terms flag exist only under Tax Forms without a visible agreement? 2. How can a developer revert back to standard App Store terms if this happens? 3. Has anyone had Ap
1
0
64
1w
pkgbuild on Tahoe fails to build packages if any directory name contains non-ascii characters
pkgbuild on Tahoe (26.3.1) fails to build packages if any directory name contains non-ascii characters. pkgbuild is able to build successfully with the same source data on previous versions on macOS, so this is a regression and prevents us from build able to build our products on macOS 26. Example that demonstrates the issue: mkdir -p MyAppData/Taishōgoto echo Testing >> MyAppData/Taishōgoto/Content.txt pkgbuild --identifier com.example.MyAppData --install-location '/Library/Application Support/MyAppData' --root MyAppData myappdata.pkg Error messages: parent directory ./Taishōgoto does not exist pkgbuild: error: Cannot write package to myappdata.pkg. (The file “package.bom” couldn’t be saved in the folder “NSIRD_pkgbuild_52fPuN”.) I have submitted this via Feedback Assistant (FB22312299). I have not found a workaround. Tried copying pkgbuild from Sequoia but the problem persisted, probably because the buggy code is in PackageKit rather than the tool itself.
3
0
69
1w
Reply to pkgbuild on Tahoe fails to build packages if any directory name contains non-ascii characters
[quote='881307022, nixx, /thread/820080?answerId=881307022#881307022, /profile/nixx'] staging the package contents in an HFS volume … allows pkgbuild to succeed [/quote] I’m glad that worked but… sheesh… it’s a bit of a worry. Hopefully we’ll get a fix to FB22312299 sooner rather than later. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
1w
Reply to How works Experiment (Documentation) in Swift Playground?
[quote='881369022, marrgd, /thread/820088?answerId=881369022#881369022, /profile/marrgd'] I lost the knowledge, how to open the pdf book on Swift Playground to experiment inside Swift Playground. [/quote] Right. This is what were were discussing on your other thread. There’s no direct fix, but you can work around it by creating your own playground and copying chunks of code from the tutorial to that playground. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic: Programming Languages SubTopic: Swift Tags:
1w
Reply to 26.4 beta and RC versions are unable to be created on anything but 26.4 beta host OS
OK, here’s a summary, sorted by version: Version | User ------- | ---- 4.0.0.0.1.1762585687 | kthchew 4.0.0.0.1.1762585687 | nathan-pierce-veertu 4.0.0.0.1.1772003596 | eskimo As you can see, I’m on the latest. And this is indeed the version of the MobileDevice package inside Xcode 26.4 [1]. Consider: % plutil -extract CFBundleShortVersionString raw /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Info.plist 26.4 % xar -xf /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Resources/Packages/MobileDevice.pkg % cat PackageInfo … Earlier I wrote: [quote='880808022, DTS Engineer, /thread/819456?answerId=880808022#880808022'] When I wrote the above I hadn’t yet installed Xcode 26.4rc. So I installed that and repeated the test. [/quote] I don’t think that had an effect because I’d installed an earlier release of the Xcode 26.4 beta, one that had the same MobileDevice installer version. So I was on the latest MobileDevice prior to running my test, and updating to Xcode 26.4rc didn’t change that. So my understanding of how this
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
1w
Waiting Over A Month For Review
As the title suggests, I've been waiting over a month for a review. Testing patience to say the least when the official word is less than 72 hours.. What is going on? The version in review is now out of date as I've developed features quicker than Apple has been able to review them, yet I daren't remove the app from review as I'll lose my place in the queue. So even when/if it gets approved, I'll immediately have to add a new version for review. What a farce. Submission ID 994fa30a-92a6-4923-8cc8-b94090986b39
Replies
5
Boosts
0
Views
120
Activity
1w
Missing DirectX Calls for Tearing and Depth Bound Test in D3DMetal and GPTK 3
I want to address the missing or incomplete DirectX calls from D3DMetal and Game Porting Toolkit 3. These missing calls have in part caused issue with our porting process and we are reconsidering. Missing or Incomplete Calls DXGI_FEATURE_PRESENT_ALLOW_TEARING — IDXGIFactory5::CheckFeatureSupport — this calls has to do with how VSync is handled and some modern games require it to initialize. Currently D3DMetal return 0 maybe by design but most likely because it’s not integrated. Adding a stub that returns 1 can fix this. I’m my use case I simply Noped the check and forced it to continue. D3D12_FEATURE_D3D12_OPTIONS2.DepthBoundsTestSupported — this call is also not present. Which causes games to not initialize rendering. Thankfully this was fixed by once again skipping the check. But this is essential for water rendering. This could be one reason currently water is not rendering in our game. IDXGIOutput6::GetDesc1().ColorSpace — returns DXGI_COLOR_SPACE_RGB_FULL_G22_NONE_P709 (SDR) on
Replies
5
Boosts
0
Views
231
Activity
1w
Reply to Missing DirectX Calls for Tearing and Depth Bound Test in D3DMetal and GPTK 3
Well anyway just wanted to address the missing calls port will still require a lot more than what the D3DMetal layer can offer. Hopefully it's patched.
Topic: Graphics & Games SubTopic: Metal Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
SPM Failed to verified fingerprint for SSH url since Tahoe 26.3
Hi there, I recently updated to the latest version of macOS Tahoe 26.3. Since then, Xcode is not able to resolve my Swift Package dependencies anymore. We use SSH for all our Github hosted packages. When package resolution is running, we randomly have Failed to verify SSH fingerprint on some remote package. Nothing has changed and it worked perfectly with Tahoe 26.2. The SSH have been reconfigured and known hosts have been verified. Is something changed between those 2 versions or is it a bug ?
Replies
16
Boosts
0
Views
2.3k
Activity
1w
iOS 26 Regression: Screen Time Permission Lost, had to be re-authenticated
Hello, my app is frequently loosing / forgetting the Screen Time Permission that had been granted previously on iOS 26. I have experienced it myself, sysdiagnose is in this radar: FB18997699 But also also my App Store users who have updated to iOS 26 already have reported this bug. It would be great if Apple could ensure that this bug is addressed before iOS 26 is released to the public.
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
377
Activity
1w
Reply to 26.4 beta and RC versions are unable to be created on anything but 26.4 beta host OS
Weirdly I had to install it twice on one older M1. I did it first with sudo installer -pkg MobileDevice-26.4.pkg -tgt / and then had to use the GUI to install. Just FYI for anyone who has the same issue
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
Reply to 26.4 beta and RC versions are unable to be created on anything but 26.4 beta host OS
Little request for the devs at apple: Please make these MobileDevice pkgs available on the downloads site for every release. I shouldn't need to download the whole Xcode.app and extract it manually each time I need this pkg. <3
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
App Transfer Completed but Extension App IDs Missing and Cannot Be Recreated
Hello, We recently transferred our iOS app to a new Apple Developer account, and we are experiencing an issue that is currently blocking our release. The transfer of the main app appears to have completed successfully: The app is visible in App Store Connect under the recipient account The main bundle ID is available However, the App IDs for our extensions are missing from the recipient account in Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles. Affected bundle identifiers: com.finanfut.finanfut.NotificationService com.finanfut.finanfut.NotificationContentExtension The issue is: These App IDs do NOT appear in the recipient account We are NOT able to create them manually Apple returns: “The app identifier is not available” As a result: Xcode cannot generate provisioning profiles We get errors like: No profiles for 'com.finanfut.finanfut.NotificationContentExtension' were found We are blocked from archiving and distributing the app It seems that the App IDs are still reserved in Apple's backend but were not p
Replies
2
Boosts
0
Views
46
Activity
1w
Reply to 26.4 beta and RC versions are unable to be created on anything but 26.4 beta host OS
During the beta cycle, developers can get the required MobileDevice by installing the latest Xcode seed. That's problematic on macOS 15.x because Xcode 26.4 now requires macOS 26.2. However, would it be possible to open the Xcode.app/Contents/Resources/Packages/MobileDevice.pkg manually on a macOS 15.x machine to get the required mobile device files? Once the OS is released, either: That doesn't seem to match my experience. macOS 26.4 is now out, and I've updated to macOS 15.7.5 (24G624), but when I try using the restore image of the release version of macOS 26.4 to make a VM, I'm still prompted to install the mobile device files and it still says that they aren't available from the software update server.
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
Reply to UK TAX INFO - alternative terms addendum - showing under tax forms with no visible agreement
Have the exact same issue for a few months now with no help from support. I also do not use any alternative app store payments or alternative terms, neither do I have a VAT number. And because of this it's also now unable to submit apps with IAP. I have this on my account for 3 months now: Add Missing Tax Info To ensure your account is taxed accurately or avoid losing access to some App Store Connect features, complete tax form(s) below with missing information. I requested to remove it which they are supposed to remove within one month. I have at this point had to raise the issue with the ccpc (Competition and Consumer Protection Commission) in Ireland as it seems legal route is the only way forward. Have had countless cases open with apple dev support, finance, etc. Yet noone has an answer nor taken any action.
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
UK TAX INFO - alternative terms addendum - showing under tax forms with no visible agreement
Hello everyone, I’m facing a confusing issue in App Store Connect and hoping someone here has encountered this before. Context: • Company developer account (UK-based) • App is free to download • Only optional In-App Purchases (Apple IAP) • No external payments • Using standard App Store distribution • Paid Apps agreement is active • US tax forms (W-8BEN-E) are active Issue: Under Agreements → Tax Forms, I see: United Kingdom Tax Info – Alternative Terms Addendum – Missing Tax Info However: • There is no Alternative Terms Addendum visible under Agreements • I have not intentionally opted into EU DMA Alternative Terms • I do not have a UK VAT number (Apple should be Merchant of Record under standard IAP) Finance Support says they do not support Alternative Terms. Agreements support has not responded yet. Questions: 1. Can the Alternative Terms flag exist only under Tax Forms without a visible agreement? 2. How can a developer revert back to standard App Store terms if this happens? 3. Has anyone had Ap
Replies
1
Boosts
0
Views
64
Activity
1w
pkgbuild on Tahoe fails to build packages if any directory name contains non-ascii characters
pkgbuild on Tahoe (26.3.1) fails to build packages if any directory name contains non-ascii characters. pkgbuild is able to build successfully with the same source data on previous versions on macOS, so this is a regression and prevents us from build able to build our products on macOS 26. Example that demonstrates the issue: mkdir -p MyAppData/Taishōgoto echo Testing >> MyAppData/Taishōgoto/Content.txt pkgbuild --identifier com.example.MyAppData --install-location '/Library/Application Support/MyAppData' --root MyAppData myappdata.pkg Error messages: parent directory ./Taishōgoto does not exist pkgbuild: error: Cannot write package to myappdata.pkg. (The file “package.bom” couldn’t be saved in the folder “NSIRD_pkgbuild_52fPuN”.) I have submitted this via Feedback Assistant (FB22312299). I have not found a workaround. Tried copying pkgbuild from Sequoia but the problem persisted, probably because the buggy code is in PackageKit rather than the tool itself.
Replies
3
Boosts
0
Views
69
Activity
1w
Reply to pkgbuild on Tahoe fails to build packages if any directory name contains non-ascii characters
[quote='881307022, nixx, /thread/820080?answerId=881307022#881307022, /profile/nixx'] staging the package contents in an HFS volume … allows pkgbuild to succeed [/quote] I’m glad that worked but… sheesh… it’s a bit of a worry. Hopefully we’ll get a fix to FB22312299 sooner rather than later. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
Reply to How works Experiment (Documentation) in Swift Playground?
[quote='881369022, marrgd, /thread/820088?answerId=881369022#881369022, /profile/marrgd'] I lost the knowledge, how to open the pdf book on Swift Playground to experiment inside Swift Playground. [/quote] Right. This is what were were discussing on your other thread. There’s no direct fix, but you can work around it by creating your own playground and copying chunks of code from the tutorial to that playground. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic: Programming Languages SubTopic: Swift Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w
Reply to 26.4 beta and RC versions are unable to be created on anything but 26.4 beta host OS
OK, here’s a summary, sorted by version: Version | User ------- | ---- 4.0.0.0.1.1762585687 | kthchew 4.0.0.0.1.1762585687 | nathan-pierce-veertu 4.0.0.0.1.1772003596 | eskimo As you can see, I’m on the latest. And this is indeed the version of the MobileDevice package inside Xcode 26.4 [1]. Consider: % plutil -extract CFBundleShortVersionString raw /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Info.plist 26.4 % xar -xf /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Resources/Packages/MobileDevice.pkg % cat PackageInfo … Earlier I wrote: [quote='880808022, DTS Engineer, /thread/819456?answerId=880808022#880808022'] When I wrote the above I hadn’t yet installed Xcode 26.4rc. So I installed that and repeated the test. [/quote] I don’t think that had an effect because I’d installed an earlier release of the Xcode 26.4 beta, one that had the same MobileDevice installer version. So I was on the latest MobileDevice prior to running my test, and updating to Xcode 26.4rc didn’t change that. So my understanding of how this
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
1w