I've noticed that the font file PingFang.ttc is no longer in /System/Library/Fonts/LanguageSupport/ on iOS 18. And I use CoreText APIs get the new font file, which is int the FontServices.framework and named PingFangUI.ttc. But it doesn't seem to be a regular TrueType font collection. It can't be parsed correctly by stb_truetype. I copied this file to my mac, and it can't be opened by Font.app either, which says it doesn't contain installable fonts. It also can’t pass font validation (Font.app → File → Verify File), saying “System validation failed”, I don't know what that means. So I tried to read the binary of that file. I've noticed that the ‘CFF ‘ table is missing in the new font file, and there is a new table 'hvgl'. But I can't find any documentation for this table. Maybe this is a new format. And what confuses me is that the TTC header of the new font file has not changed, same as the old PingFang.ttc file, with a ‘ttcf’ tag, and majorVersion is 2 minorVersion is 0. Please tell me how to parse
missing package product
42,946 results found
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Hello, Apple Developer Team, Recently, we have encountered some rather tricky issues regarding different transactionIds but the same appAccountToken appearing in the JSON data returned when calling the Apple API /inApps/v1/transactions/. The situation is as follows: We obtained the order numbers from the payment receipts provided by the customer. The customer gave us two different order numbers. The payment date is July 9, 2024. By checking our server, we can see two different transactionIds. However, when calling /inApps/v1/transactions/, the JSON data we receive contains the same appAccountToken. The purchase dates for these two orders are very close to each other: transactionId1: July 9, 2024, 21:37:06 transactionId2: July 9, 2024, 21:37:00 Additional Information: 1)The server is using App Store Server API V2. 2)The client is using StoreKit V1. 3)Environment: Production. 4)type: Consumable This issue is not an isolated case. It occurs almost every month. We kindly request assistance from the Apple
[quote='794608022, swp336, /thread/759022?answerId=794608022#794608022, /profile/swp336'] I'm assuming there's something about the setup on my machine that's causing the newly minted template files created by Xcode to trigger the one of the error conditions. [/quote] Right. I’m hoping that, once you track down the identity of this ‘detritus’, it’ll be clear where it’s coming from. For example, I vaguely recall seeing a problem like this where the developer had their build products on iCloud Drive, and iCloud Drive’s extended attributes were causing this issue. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Enrol Supervised iOS device. Push an CardDAV policy for the above device, the contacts gets synced in the native Contacts app as expected. (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/devicemanagement/carddav) When the above same profile is re-installed in the above device, the synced contacts are lost and password prompt is shown to enter the password - even though the installed profile contains password for the CardDAV policy. Password prompt from the device Re-Installed configuration PayloadVersion 1 PayloadUUID 35ee541b-fec0-46b0-bd48-bcc0702ab60b PayloadType Configuration PayloadOrganization MDM PayloadIdentifier com.mdm.ec89620f-2905-4c14-b09d-7e9f17944468.CardDAV PayloadDisplayName CardDAV PayloadRemovalDisallowed PayloadContent PayloadVersion 1 PayloadUUID 07c423b5-8ae2-4e6e-9336-aa9ca850d6c9 PayloadType com.apple.carddav.account PayloadOrganization MDM PayloadIdentifier 07cV423b5-8ae2-4e6e-9336-aa9ca850d6c9 PayloadDisplayName CardDAV Policy CardDAVAccountDescription **** CardDAVHostName
Truffle &/or any Ethereum tools are not an apple product. Post your questions on the Truffle support board.
I've followed all the advice on these forums regarding developing network extensions. I'm working on a FilterDataProvider using the SimpleFirewall example project as a starting point. The issue I run into is that the copy of the extension binary that the system manages does not get updated by the system when I copy a new application into the /Applications directory. Here's my workflow: Build and run the application from Xcode. I've added a pre-run action that copies the extension into a /Applications/SysExtDev folder so I don't have to disable SIP. Test & make changes to code Disable & remove the extension in Settings > Network > Filters & Proxies Build and run the application from Xcode. New app binary loads, but the old extension binary loads. I also notice that the app will report that the extension is already registered even when it's not present in the UI in System Settings. And when I enable the extension in the newly launched app, I don't see the full flow of confirmation dialogs, onl
Hello guys! I would appreciate your help. I am developing an app (next to my webapp). In this app users can register as either owners of moving company or as the customers. Moving company owners can list their company like a directory/business listing. The app is free to use for customers and also for company owners except if you want to list your moving company to be able to get clients and sell your physical service. Now i have a subscription plan in mind so the moving company can list itself, which will also be listen on my webapp as the databank is shared. According to someone this doesnt require IAP, because at the end the company is paying for the listing, to help him sell his physical service. next to it, i also want to get provision for each time the moving company gets a client through our app and pays through our app. thirdly, i was planning to offer sponsored Listing, which will aswell work for my webapp. Meaning if someone pays for sponsored listing on my app he gets sponsored on my webapp aswell
Hello, I am developing App Store Server to Server Notifications. (The app has already been deployed and is in operation.) Test notifications in both the Sandbox and Production environments have been working correctly. Additionally, I tested in-app purchases using a Sandbox account and confirmed that the server notifications are received. However, when an actual purchase is made in the live app, the server notifications are not received. Please provide the possible causes and solutions for this issue.
What is the point of having the screen time feature if you can just disable it? Say for example I want to enable an app blocker on my phone in order to be more productive. It requires the passcode to enable it. But I can simply disable any blocker just by using the same passcode. Can Apple make it so that my app blockers work? So that if I just get bored I can’t simply disable it then go on YouTube and waste 2 hours of my life?
*** UPDATE *** Not sure I made it clear previously but I'm developing a Freemium update to a previously paid Mac App. The discussion below relates to StoreKit testing in Xcode. After a week of experimenting I'm now in possession of more facts, and have a clearer idea of how to express what I'm looking for. I contacted Apple with a TSI and was told that the forums were the way to go, and an Apple engineer would look at this post, so here goes. I've distilled the purchase/subscription situation into the diagram below. The boxes are a simplified notion of state, and the arrows connecting them are in effect state transitions, caused by the labelled events. Some of the content is empirical, gleaned from experimenting. I want to be able to receive timely notifications in my app, of each event occurrence, so I can write rigorous (reactive) code to capture my business logic. To attempt to achieve this I'm listening for two things: Transaction changes, via Transaction.updates() Subscription status changes, via Product
I have two remote Swift Packages (call them A & B). B depends on A, and package B is declared as a dependency in the app project. I have set up Xcode Cloud for this project so that it builds an archive when there is a change to the main branch. This works fine. I also want to set up Xcode Cloud workflows to run tests when there are changes to either the repos of A or B. Both Bitbucket repositories of A and B are listed as primary repositories for the project (in the Xcode Cloud tab) and both have been granted access. So far I've only gotten this working for package B, where the condition is a pull request against the main branch. So this works fine too. However, for package A, Xcode Cloud is not picking up any pull requests, so it's not triggering the action for the workflow. The problem I see is that when I look at the repository settings on Bitbucket, there is no https://appstoreconnect.apple.com/ci/webhook/bitbucket webhook in A's repository. There is one for the rep
Thank you so much, Quinn! I genuinely owe you for how often you unblock my from complicated issues :) I agree that it would be best to let Xcode do the heavy lifting, and perhaps I will investigate that in the future - for now, since I already have a build pipeline set up for OpenSSL and Curl, I went with your suggestion of looking at what Xcode does and making a similar structure. I can confirm that once I defined the module map within the platform-specific frameworks I can now use the libraries in Swift, both a Swift framework and a Swift package.
The Full Disk Access authorization exists to facilitate the sort of thing you're describing. It disable the user privacy protection that's blocking access above. You can find the Full Disk Access setting in System Settings > Privacy & Security > Privacy. If I configure a LaunchDaemon using “SMAppService”, will the LaunchDaemon also share the “Full Disk Access” permission of the main app? Two answers to that: Yes. Part of the reason this API exists is that keeping the all of the app components inside the app bundle makes it easier to ensure that TCC permission can be correctly inherited, including FDA. Qualified but. Bugs are always possible, particularly with components that are executing outside the standard execution flow (like a LaunchDaemon running as root). If your app relies on FDA, then you should also consider how you'll handle access failures in a clean/graceful way. Keep in mind that there are many reasons access can fail (for example, Endpoint Security extensions or system external permis
Hi there, I successfully created an AppIntent for our app, and when I had it in the same target as our main app it showed up fine in the shortcuts app. Then I realized that many of the new System Control widgets introduced in iOS 18 (e.g. lockscreen, control center) live in the widget extension target, but they also need to reference that same AppIntent. So to fix this, I thought I'd migrate out the code into it's own SPM package that both the WidgetExtension and the Main App processes can reference. However, after doing that and rebuilding, the intent no longer shows up in the Shortcuts app. Furthermore, my AppShortcutsProvider class now has this error when trying to define the list of appShortcuts: App Intent should be in the same target as AppShortcutsProvider Is this intended, and if so, how do we reference the same AppIntent across multiple targets?
Have they ever connected to your phone? Did you see the connection dialog appear? Have you read the instructions in the AirPods Pro packaging that show you how to start pairing?