General: Forums subtopic: App & System Services > Networking TN3151 Choosing the right networking API Networking Overview document — Despite the fact that this is in the archive, this is still really useful. TLS for App Developers forums post Choosing a Network Debugging Tool documentation WWDC 2019 Session 712 Advances in Networking, Part 1 — This explains the concept of constrained networking, which is Apple’s preferred solution to questions like How do I check whether I’m on Wi-Fi? TN3135 Low-level networking on watchOS TN3179 Understanding local network privacy Adapt to changing network conditions tech talk Understanding Also-Ran Connections forums post Extra-ordinary Networking forums post Foundation networking: Forums tags: Foundation, CFNetwork URL Loading System documentation — NSURLSession, or URLSession in Swift, is the recommended API for HTTP[S] on Apple platforms. Moving to Fewer, Larger Transfers forums post Testing Background Session Code forums post Network framework: Forums tag: Network Network framework documentation — Network framework is the recommended API for TCP, UDP, and QUIC on Apple platforms. Building a custom peer-to-peer protocol sample code (aka TicTacToe) Implementing netcat with Network Framework sample code (aka nwcat) Configuring a Wi-Fi accessory to join a network sample code Moving from Multipeer Connectivity to Network Framework forums post NWEndpoint History and Advice forums post Wi-Fi (general): How to modernize your captive network developer news post Wi-Fi Fundamentals forums post Filing a Wi-Fi Bug Report forums post Working with a Wi-Fi Accessory forums post — This is part of the Extra-ordinary Networking series. Wi-Fi (iOS): TN3111 iOS Wi-Fi API overview technote Wi-Fi Aware framework documentation WirelessInsights framework documentation iOS Network Signal Strength forums post Network Extension Resources Wi-Fi on macOS: Forums tag: Core WLAN Core WLAN framework documentation Secure networking: Forums tags: Security Apple Platform Security support document Preventing Insecure Network Connections documentation — This is all about App Transport Security (ATS). WWDC 2017 Session 701 Your Apps and Evolving Network Security Standards [1] — This is generally interesting, but the section starting at 17:40 is, AFAIK, the best information from Apple about how certificate revocation works on modern systems. Available trusted root certificates for Apple operating systems support article Requirements for trusted certificates in iOS 13 and macOS 10.15 support article About upcoming limits on trusted certificates support article Apple’s Certificate Transparency policy support article What’s new for enterprise in iOS 18 support article — This discusses new key usage requirements. Technote 2232 HTTPS Server Trust Evaluation Technote 2326 Creating Certificates for TLS Testing QA1948 HTTPS and Test Servers Miscellaneous: More network-related forums tags: 5G, QUIC, Bonjour On FTP forums post Using the Multicast Networking Additional Capability forums post Investigating Network Latency Problems forums post Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" [1] This video is no longer available from Apple, but the URL should help you locate other sources of this info.

Device: iPhone 13 OS Version: iOS 26.4, iOS 26.5 Summary: The Settings app crashes when accessing the Sandbox account management screen in Developer Settings while the device is offline. Steps to Reproduce: Enable Developer Mode on the device Disconnect from the internet (Wi-Fi and cellular off) Go to Settings → Developer Ensure a Sandbox account is signed in Tap on "Sandbox" Tap on "Manage" Expected Result: The system should either: Open the Sandbox management screen, or Show an error indicating no internet connection Actual Result: The Settings app crashes immediately after tapping "Manage". Reproducibility: Always (100%) when offline Additional Notes: Issue observed on iOS 26.4 and iOS 26.5 Does not occur on iOS 18 May also be present in other iOS 26.x versions Does not occur when the device has an active internet connection

Hello, We have a security solution which intercepts network traffic for inspection using a combination of Transparent Proxy Provider and Content filter. Lately we are seeing reports from the market that on M5 Macbooks and A18 Neos the system will kernel panic using our solution, even though it never happens on M1-M4 and no significant code changes were made in the mean time. All crashes seem to be related to an internal double free in the kernel: panic(cpu 0 caller 0xfffffe003bb68224): skmem_slab_free_locked: attempt to free invalid or already-freed obj 0xf2fffe29e15f2400 on skm 0xf6fffe2518aaa200 @skmem_slab.c:646 Debugger message: panic Memory ID: 0xff OS release type: User OS version: 25D2128 Kernel version: Darwin Kernel Version 25.3.0: Wed Jan 28 20:54:38 PST 2026; root:xnu-12377.91.3~2/RELEASE_ARM64_T6050 Additionally, from further log inspection, before panics we find some weird kernel messages which seem to be related to some DMA operations gone wrong in the network driver on some machines: 2026-03-30 14:11:21.779124+0300 0x30f2 Default 0x0 873 0 Arc: (Network) [com.apple.network:connection] [C9.1.1.1 IPv4#e5b4bb04:443 in_progress socket-flow (satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: en0[802.11], ipv4, ipv6, dns, uses wifi, flow divert agg: 1, LQM: good)] event: flow:start_connect @0.075s 2026-03-30 14:11:21.780015+0300 0x1894 Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: (402262746): No more valid control units, disabling flow divert 2026-03-30 14:11:21.780017+0300 0x1894 Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: (402262746): Skipped all flow divert services, disabling flow divert 2026-03-30 14:11:21.780102+0300 0x1894 Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: SK[2]: flow_entry_alloc fe "0 proc kernel_task(0)Arc nx_port 1 flow_uuid D46E230E-B826-4E0A-8C59-4C4C8BF6AA60 flags 0x14120<CONNECTED,QOS_MARKING,EXT_PORT,EXT_FLOWID> ipver=4,src=<IPv4-redacted>.49703,dst=<IPv4-redacted>.443,proto=0x06 mask=0x0000003f,hash=0x04e0a750 tp_proto=0x06" 2026-03-30 14:11:21.780194+0300 0x1894 Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: tcp connect outgoing: [<IPv4-redacted>:49703<-><IPv4-redacted>:443] interface: en0 (skipped: 0) so_gencnt: 14634 t_state: SYN_SENT process: Arc:873 SYN in/out: 0/1 bytes in/out: 0/0 pkts in/out: 0/0 rtt: 0.0 ms rttvar: 250.0 ms base_rtt: 0 ms error: 0 so_error: 0 svc/tc: 0 flow: 0x9878386f 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934431+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: Hit error condition (not panicking as we're in error handler): t8110dart <private> (dart-apcie0): invalid SID 2 TTBR access: level 1 table_index 0 page_offset 0x2 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934432+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: [ 73.511690]: arm_cpu_init(): cpu 6 online 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934441+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: [ 73.511696]: arm_cpu_init(): cpu 9 online 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934441+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: [ 73.569033]: arm_cpu_init(): cpu 6 online 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934441+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: [ 73.569038]: arm_cpu_init(): cpu 9 online 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934442+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: [ 73.577453]: arm_cpu_init(): cpu 7 online 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934442+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: [ 73.586328]: arm_cpu_init(): cpu 5 online 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934442+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: [ 73.586332]: arm_cpu_init(): cpu 8 online 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934442+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: [ 73.621392]: (dart-apcie0) AppleT8110DART::_fatalException: dart-apcie0 (<ptr>): DART DART SID exception ERROR_SID_SUMMARY 0x00003000 ERROR_ADDRESS 0x0000000000009800 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934443+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: [ 73.621397]: Hit error condition (not panicking as we're in error handler): 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934443+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: t8110dart <ptr> (dart-apcie0): invalid SID 2 TTBR access: level 1 table_index 0 page_offset 0x2Expect a `deadbeef` in the error messages below 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934452+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: Expect a `deadbeef` in the error messages below 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934456+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: (AppleEmbeddedPCIE) apcie[0:centauri-control]::_dartErrorHandler() InvalidPTE caused by read from address 0x9800 by SID 2 (RID 2:0:1/useCount 1/device <private>) 2026-03-30 14:11:21.934469+0300 0xed Default 0x0 0 0 kernel: (AppleT8110DART) Ignored dart-apcie0 (0xfbfffe18820b0000): DART(DART) error: SID 2 PTE invalid exception on read of DVA 0x9800 (SEG 0 PTE 0x2) ERROR_SID_SUMMARY 0x00003000 TIME 0x11242d43fd TTE 0xffffffffffffffff AXI_ID 0 We do not have any correlation between machines, usage pattern or installed applications. Uninstalling the network protection features seem to largely fix the issues, even though we have heard of crashes happening even in safe mode or with our network extension disabled from system settings. We weren't able to reproduce internally and it seems to happen completely random on client machines, but often enough to be disrupting. Can you tell us please if this is a known problem and if there's a workaround or what can we do to narrow it down? Thanks.

I’m working on an iOS Network Extension where a NEPacketTunnelProviderconfigures a local HTTP/HTTPS proxy usingNEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings.proxySettings. Per NEProxySettings.exceptionList docs: If the destination host name of an HTTP connection matches one of these patterns then the proxy settings will not be used for the connection. However, I’m seeing two distinct issues: Issue A (exception bypass not working): HTTPS traffic to a host that matches exceptionList still reaches the proxy. Issue B (domain-scoped proxy not applied): When matchDomains is set to match a specific domain (example: ["googlevideo.com"]), I still observe its traffic in some apps is not proxied. If I remove the domain from matchDomains, the same traffic is proxied. Environment OS: iOS (reproduced with 26.4 and other versions) Devices: Reproduced with several iPhones (likely iPads as well) Xcode: 26.3 Extension: NEPacketTunnelProvider Minimal Repro (code) This is the minimal configuration. Toggle between CONFIG A / CONFIG B to reproduce each issue. import NetworkExtension final class PacketTunnelProvider: NEPacketTunnelProvider { override func startTunnel( options: [String : NSObject]? = nil, completionHandler: @escaping (Error?) -> Void ) { let proxyPort = 12345 // proxy listening port let settings = NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings(tunnelRemoteAddress: "8.8.8.8") let proxySettings = NEProxySettings() proxySettings.httpEnabled = true proxySettings.httpsEnabled = true proxySettings.httpServer = NEProxyServer(address: "1.2.3.4", port: proxyPort) // proxy listening address proxySettings.httpsServer = NEProxyServer(address: "1.2.3.4", port: proxyPort) // proxy listening address // CONFIG A: proxy all domains, but exclude some domains // proxySettings.matchDomains can be set to match all domains // proxySettings.exceptionList = ["*.cdninstagram.com", "cdninstagram.com"] // CONFIG B: proxy only a specific domain // proxySettings.matchDomains = ["googlevideo.com"] settings.proxySettings = proxySettings setTunnelNetworkSettings(settings) { error in completionHandler(error) } } } Repro steps Issue A (exceptionList bypass not working) Enable the VPN configuration and start the tunnel with CONFIG A (exceptionList = ["*.cdninstagram.com", "cdninstagram.com"]). Open the Instagram app to trigger HTTPS connections to *.cdninstagram.com Inspect proxy logs: cdninstagram.com traffic is still received by the proxy. Safari comparison: If I access URLs that trigger the same *.cdninstagram.com hosts from Safari, it can behave as expected. When the traffic is triggered from the Instagram app, the excluded host still reaches the proxy as CONNECT, which is unexpected. Issue B (matchDomains not applied for YouTube traffic) Start the tunnel with CONFIG B (matchDomains = ["googlevideo.com"]). Open the YouTube app and start playing a video (traffic typically targets *.googlevideo.com). Inspect proxy logs: googlevideo.com traffic is not received by the proxy. Remove the host from matchDomains and observe that googlevideo.com traffic is received by the proxy. Safari comparison: If I access a googlevideo.com host from Safari while matchDomains = ["googlevideo.com"], it behaves as expected (proxied). In contrast, the YouTube app’s googlevideo.com traffic is not proxied unless I match all domains. Expected Issue A Connections to *.cdninstagram.com in the Instagram app should not use the proxy and should not reach the local proxy server. Issue B With matchDomains = ["googlevideo.com"], traffic to *.googlevideo.com (YouTube video traffic) should be proxied and therefore reach the local proxy. Actual Issue A The local proxy still receives the request as: CONNECT scontent-mad1-1.cdninstagram.com:443 HTTP/1.1 So the bypass does not happen. Issue B With matchDomains = ["googlevideo.com"], I still observe googlevideo.com traffic in the YouTube app that is not delivered to the proxy. When all traffic is proxied, the same traffic is delivered to the proxy.

While going through the documentation for NWConnection, there seems to be state known as .waiting which means that the connection is waiting for a path change. For TCP, the state is understandable and can occur under some scenarios. But for the case of UDP, I have following queries: Why do we need .waiting state for the case of UDP? Even if we do need .waiting state for UDP, when all does this state occurs?

Hello All, I have a app which has a WKWebview loading some code from a remote origin - https://my-company.example.com When WKWebview loads remote origin, that page does load some of the sub-resources from in-app localhost server (GCDWebserver), i.e. reach out to a loopback based in-app GCDWebserver, now to provide a secure context I had an existing setup with self signed cert, CORS and everything needed for https on localhost. And the sub-resources used to load fine from https localhost till 26.4 Starting with iOS 26.4 it started breaking with TLSv1_ALERT_UNKNOWN_CA Is there any known guidance for this? Technically as per w3c spec, localhost is considered secure context by default right? and no special things need to be done. But ios/Webkit seem to be different in this regard. Is this a known issue, and is there any mitigation here? I'll try to provide a sample app soon if possible.

We are seeing an issue after updating iPads to iPadOS 26.4 where cellular service is lost until network settings are reset. Environment: Devices managed via Apple Business Manager and Microsoft Intune Carrier: Verizon Confirmed affected devices: iPad (9th generation) eSIM Behavior: After update, device shows no cellular service No prompt to re-activate or re-add the cellular plan The plan appears to still be present on the device Workaround observed: Resetting Network Settings restores service Notes: This does not appear to be a provisioning issue (no need to re-add eSIM) Behavior suggests the cellular/eSIM state may not be initializing correctly after update Toggling Cellular or Airplane mode has not yet been tested for service restoration. We have not yet confirmed whether devices using a physical SIM are affected Still gathering data on scope across additional iPad models Additional observation: We have not observed this behavior on iPhones (e.g., iPhone 16 on iOS 26.4 with LTE remains unaffected) Has anyone else observed similar behavior on iPadOS 26.4, particularly on managed devices or eSIM configurations?

After implementing the new structured concurrency API's for Network framework, we are noticing a few memory leaks in the Network framework when using API's like onViabilityUpdate and onBetterPathUpdate. Whenever a previously established connection is disconnected, the NWConnection object is never released by the Network framework when we use the 2 API's mentioned. Irrespective of what goes inside these handlers(or leave it empty), the connection object is leaking. If I comment out the handlers, there is no memory leak. Posting this here in the forum to understand if others have encountered similar issues and found a workaround? Raised a feedback assistant request with all the details and a sample app here: FB22339653

I’m working on a product that includes TLS inspection capability. TLS inspection using a local MitM requires installing a trusted root certificate which is then used to create masquerade certificates to intercept and forward TLS traffic through the proxy. For manual installation the end user is required to authenticate as an administrator to modify the trust settings on our internal CA’s root certificate. My question concerns the options for enterprise deployment using an MDM. We want the generated root certificate to be unique to each endpoint so that if a private key is compromised it can’t be used to intercept traffic anywhere else. We can install a “certificate trust” configuration profile from the MDM but this requires a base64 encoded string of the root certificate. In effect the MDM needs to obtain the certificate from the endpoint and then send it back in the form of a configuration profile. I’m not aware that MDMs like Jamf can be configured to do this directly so we’re looking for any other mechanism to have macOS trust a locally generated certificate via MDM based on some non endpoint-unique criteria? One option might be to use an external CA with a trusted certificate to sign an intermediate endpoint certificate but this creates a significant risk if the external trusted certificate were ever compromised. Is this a common industry practice? So my question remains is there a better way to trust our per endpoint root certificate via MDM without needing to install a unique per endpoint configuration profile?

This is a bit complicated to explain so bare with me. I am working on building an app that allows you to send real time video/camera captures from one Apple device to another. I am using a custom UDP protocol built on top of NWListener, NWBrowser, and NWConnection APIs. It works fine, but there are a few issues that seems to all be related to awdl: When transmitting via WiFi over the router (not using peer-to-peer), there are periodic interruptions when the wireless card on the device changes channels for awdl polling. This is resolved by changing the 5GHz WiFi channel on the router to channel 149 (or disabling AWDL altogether which is not really feasible). In order to work around number 1, I decided to build in an option to toggle/prefer peer-to-peer transmission in the app thinking that if everything goes over a peer-to-peer connection the jitter caused from the channel switching should go away. This also works, but with an important caveat. The default transmission is extremely choppy until you take an OS action that “elevates” the AWDL connection into “realtime” mode. I am using includePeerToPeer on the listener, browser, and connection as well as serviceClass interactiveVideo. For number 1, you can understand that asking users to change the channel on their router is not a great user experience, but the problem is the peer-to-peer connection workaround is also not great by default. For number 2, as an example of the behavior, I can send a stream from my Mac to my iPad over a peer-to-peer connection and it works but the video is very choppy until I move my cursor from my Mac to my iPad to trigger Universal Control. I captured the OS logs while doing this and can confirm that something happens to trigger “realtime” mode on the AWDL connection. After that, the streaming is totally smooth with zero latency. Some log samples: 2026-03-19 12:42:01.277968-0400 0x1ae294c Default 0x0 495 3 rapportd: (CoreUtils) [com.apple.rapport:CLinkD] Update client from UniversalControl:697 2026-03-19 12:42:01.278031-0400 0x1ae294c Default 0x0 495 0 rapportd: (CoreUtils) [com.apple.CoreUtils:AsyncCnx] CLinkCnx-6089: Connect start: 'CLink-ed3b9618b4e0._companion-link._tcp.local.%13' 2026-03-19 12:42:01.278149-0400 0x1ae294c Default 0x0 495 0 rapportd: (CoreUtils) [com.apple.CoreUtils:AsyncCnx] CLinkCnx-6089: Querying SRV CLink-ed3b9618b4e0._companion-link._tcp.local.%13 2026-03-19 12:42:01.279454-0400 0x1ae253a Info 0x0 382 0 wifip2pd: [com.apple.awdl:datapathInitiator] Created AWDLDatapathInitiator clink-ed3b9618b4e0._companion-link._tcp.local <To: 2e:f2:5a:15:76:52> 2026-03-19 12:42:01.279498-0400 0x1ae294c Default 0x0 495 0 rapportd: (CoreUtils) [com.apple.CoreUtils:AsyncCnx] CLinkCnx-6089: Resolving DNS f970afcc-1f1c-47af-a3f3-0236c9f9bbb0.local.%13 2026-03-19 12:42:01.279588-0400 0x1ae253a Default 0x0 382 0 wifip2pd: [com.apple.awdl:datapathInitiator] AWDLDatapathInitiator clink-ed3b9618b4e0._companion-link._tcp.local <To: 2e:f2:5a:15:76:52> was started 2026-03-19 12:42:01.282537-0400 0x1ae294c Default 0x0 495 0 rapportd: (Network) [com.apple.network:path] nw_path_evaluator_start [5C54D967-624D-4269-B080-6C7AE63218C7 IPv6#1e905043%awdl0.49154 generic, attribution: developer] path: satisfied (Path is satisfied), interface: awdl0[802.11], dns, uses wifi 2026-03-19 12:42:01.596450-0400 0x1ae253a Debug 0x0 382 0 wifip2pd: [com.apple.awdl:driver] Received event realtimeMode 2026-03-19 12:42:01.596589-0400 0x1ae253a Default 0x0 382 0 wifip2pd: [com.apple.awdl:interface] Realtime mode updated true I noticed that on iOS 26 and iPadOS 26 a realtime mode was added specifically to the Wi-Fi Aware API which I assume does what I want: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/wifiaware/waperformancemode/realtime, but I am looking for a solution that works with the existing network API and also on previous OS versions. I have already tried a lot of things, but is there any way to programmatically trigger “realtime” mode? For additional context, the goal here is to have extremely low latency that also works for gaming. The actual latency introduced in 1 is approximately 30-50ms around once a second… adding a buffer to the stream makes the video completely smooth, but the extra delay on the receiver end is not acceptable for this use case. Any help or ideas would be appreciated. I can’t easily share a reproduce case right now, and even if I could, getting multiple devices into the exact state along with the router configuration in order to reproduce is going to be pretty difficult anyway.

In macOS Tahoe 26.2 an RDMA capability was added for Thunderbolt-5 interfaces. This has been demonstrated to significantly decrease the latency and maintain bandwidth for "clustered" Apple Silicon devices with TB5. What is the ideal and the maximum RDMA burst width for transfers over RDMA-enabled Thunderbolt-5 interfaces?

Showing All Messages [!] Error installing FBSDKLoginKit [!] /usr/bin/curl -f -L -o /Volumes/workspace/tmp/d20260316-6574-ros9od/file.zip https://github.com/facebook/facebook-ios-sdk/releases/download/v18.0.2/FacebookSDK_Dynamic.xcframework.zip --create-dirs --netrc-optional --retry 2 -A 'CocoaPods/1.16.2 cocoapods-downloader/2.1' % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:00:01 --:--:-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:00:02 --:--:-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:00:03 --:--:-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:00:04 --:--:-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:00:05 --:--:-- 0 curl: (35) Recv failure: Connection reset by peer Command exited with non-zero exit-code: 1 Running ci_post_clone.sh script failed (exited with code 1). Executable scripts are run using the interpreter specified in the shebang line.

Hello and Good day! We are conducting Bonjour Conformance Test (BCT) for Printer device. BCT result is PASSED but with warning in Multicast DNS, specifically, WARNING: SHARED REPLY TIMING - UNIFORM RANDOM REPLY TIME DISTRIBUTION Other Shared Reply Timing is passed: PASSED: MULTIPLE QUESTIONS - SHARED REPLY TIMING - UNIFORM RANDOM REPLY TIME DISTRIBUTION Environment: BCT Tool Version: 1.5.4 (15400) MacOS Sequioa 15.5 DUT Firmware : Linux Debian 9 Apple mDNSResponder 1790.80.10 Service types: _ipps._tcp, _uscans._tcp, _ipp._tcp, _uscan._tcp Router : NEC AtermWR8370N Setup: 1-to-1 [Mac->Router<-DUT connection] Based on debug.log, this is where WARNING occurs: NOTICE 2026-03-04 10:51:06.870187+0900 _shared_reply_timing 04103: Shared reply response times: min = 26ms, max = 114ms, avg = 65.50ms WARNING 2026-03-04 10:51:06.870361+0900 _shared_reply_timing 04136: 50 percent of the replies within the correct range fell in the interval 20ms and 46ms (should be close to 25%). PASSED (SHARED REPLY TIMING) In the same debug.log for MULTIPLE QUESTIONS - SHARED REPLY TIMING is PASSED: NOTICE 2026-03-04 10:52:29.912334+0900 _shared_reply_timing 04103: Shared reply response times: min = 22ms, max = 112ms, avg = 78.00ms DEBUG_2 2026-03-04 10:52:29.912849+0900 recv_packet 01997: received packet (558 bytes) PASSED (MULTIPLE QUESTIONS - SHARED REPLY TIMING) [Details] Looking at Bonjour_Conformance_Guideline.pdf https://download.developer.apple.com/Documentation/Bonjour_Conformance_Test_Guideline/Bonjour_Conformance_Guideline.pdf there were some differences: In 1.6.2 Expected Result: Test Result File of Test that All Tests Passed, this is not displayed: PASSED: SHARED REPLY TIMING - UNIFORM RANDOM REPLY TIME DISTRIBUTION And in II.8 Shared Reply Timing: (Ideally, 25% of the answers should fall in each 21ms quadrant of the range 20ms - 125ms.) and comparing to the debug.log, there was a discrepancy of the interval, because 20ms and 46ms is 26ms interval. From RFC6762 6. Responding, Ideal range is from 20ms-120ms Because of this, please advise on the questions below: I would like to know on the possible cause and resolution for these WARNINGS. And since in current BCT result, (Test result integrity signature is generated), I would like to know if this is acceptable for BCT certification. Thank you.

Our watchOS app is exploring adding audio VOIP calling capability using our in-home platform. We are using LiveCommunicationKit for this and have that all hooked up nicely in a proof of concept implementation. Our use case is primarily based around supporting end-users through various tasks with assistance from a remotely based expert. We would like for our platform to be able to display visual content on the watch's screen during the call – in other words, we would like to be able to treat this as a video call. LiveCommunicationKit fully supports all video-related flags on watchOS and doesn't appear to have any different symbol availability versus its iOS version. This high-quality thread (https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/798090) from a DTS engineer suggests that our use case should be valid (i.e. whiteboarding apps) and that the system's response to an accepted income video call is to dismiss the LCK's incoming call screen and bring the target app to the foreground, allowing it to render its custom content. Unfortunately, on watchOS the system doesn't seem to treat a video call any differently from an audio call, and won't dismiss the system UI once it's answered. We fully realize that Apple Watch doesn't have a camera for outbound video, doesn't support VideoToolbox or other low-level video convenience libraries for simplified rendering and decoding, etc. That's not what we're worried about (yet). The documentation is at best unclear about whether LCK (or CallKit, for that matter) can hand off calls flagged as video-compatible according to how we think they should, which is passing foreground UI over to the app once the call has been accepted by the user. Can any Apple people shed some light on this? I recognize we are probably trying to do something not many people have before.

I am using Network framework for connecting two iPad devices that are connected through LAN and has Wifi enabled. I have enabled peerToPeerIncluded. I would like to understand how the framework chooses the interface types for browsing and discovering devices. When I start a browser with browser.run or listener.run, does the browser and advertiser browse and listen on all available interface types? My concern is that if it does in only one interface, Is there a chance that the browser is browsing in one interface(Lets say WiredEthernet) and the listener is listening on another interface(Lets say AWDL) and they dont discover?

I want to track down which part of an app contacts a given domain listed in its App Privacy Report. Following the instructions given here I am able to capture a packet trace, but traffic to the domain in question is encrypted using QUIC. Is there a way to insert e.g. mitmproxy into the capture process in order to get hold of the SSLKEYLOGFILE so that I can decrypt the traffic?

Is it somehow possible to get the transport layer (UDP and TCP) payload amounts for TLS or QUIC connections established via the Network framework? (From within the app itself that establishes the connections.) I am currently using the ntstat.h kernel socket calls, but I hope there is a simpler solution. With ntstat, I have not yet been able to observe a specific connection. I have to search for the connection I am looking in all (userspace) connections.

Hello. To determine wether "AVB/EAV Mode" of a AV-capable network interfaces is turned on or off I query the IO registry and evaluate the property "AVBControllerState". I was wondering if this is the "correct" approach and if there is anything known about the values for this property? Network interfaces without AV capability may also carry this property (e.g.: for my WiFi adapter the value of 1) whereas the value for interfaces with AV capability can be 0 and 3. At least as far as I could observe with my limited amount of test devices at hand. Is it safe to assume that a value of 3 means this feature is turned on, 0 that it is turned off and ignore values of 1? Is there another approach to get to know the status of the "AVB/EAV Mode"? Thanks for any insight. Best regards, Ingo

I’m using Network Framework with UDP and calling: connection.receive(minimumIncompleteLength: 1, maximumLength: 1500) { data, context, isComplete, error in ... // Some Logic } Is it possible for this completion handler to be called with data==nil if I haven't received any kind of error, i.e., error==nil and the connection is still in the .ready state?

iOS mTLS Client Certificate Authentication Fails in TestFlight with Error -25303 Problem I'm building an iOS app that uses mTLS (client certificates received from server at runtime). Storing SecCertificate to keychain fails with error -25303 in both development and TestFlight builds, preventing SecIdentity creation needed for URLSession authentication. Environment: iOS 18.2, iPad Pro, TestFlight internal testing, keychain-access-groups properly configured Diagnostic Results Testing keychain operations shows an interesting pattern: ✅ Generic Password - Works: let addQuery: [CFString: Any] = [ kSecClass: kSecClassGenericPassword, kSecAttrAccount: "test", kSecValueData: "password".data(using: .utf8)! ] SecItemAdd(addQuery as CFDictionary, nil) // Returns: 0 (success) ✅ SecKey - Works: let addKeyQuery: [CFString: Any] = [ kSecClass: kSecClassKey, kSecValueRef: privateKey, kSecAttrApplicationTag: tag ] SecItemAdd(addKeyQuery as CFDictionary, nil) // Returns: 0 (success) ❌ SecCertificate - Fails: let addCertQuery: [CFString: Any] = [ kSecClass: kSecClassCertificate, kSecValueRef: certificate, // Created from server-provided PEM kSecAttrApplicationTag: tag ] SecItemAdd(addCertQuery as CFDictionary, nil) // Returns: -25303 Code Context Attempting to create SecIdentity for mTLS: private func createIdentity(fromCert certPEM: String, key keyPEM: String) throws -> SecIdentity { // 1. Parse PEM to DER and create SecCertificate - succeeds guard let certData = extractPEMData(from: certPEM, type: "CERTIFICATE"), let certificate = SecCertificateCreateWithData(nil, certData as CFData) else { throw CertificateError.invalidCertificate } // 2. Parse PEM key and create SecKey - succeeds guard let keyData = extractPEMData(from: keyPEM, type: "PRIVATE KEY"), let privateKey = SecKeyCreateWithData(keyData as CFData, attrs as CFDictionary, &error) else { throw CertificateError.invalidKey } // 3. Add key to keychain - SUCCEEDS (errSecSuccess) let tempTag = UUID().uuidString.data(using: .utf8)! SecItemAdd([ kSecClass: kSecClassKey, kSecValueRef: privateKey, kSecAttrApplicationTag: tempTag ] as CFDictionary, nil) // ✅ Works // 4. Add certificate to keychain - FAILS (-25303) let status = SecItemAdd([ kSecClass: kSecClassCertificate, kSecValueRef: certificate, kSecAttrApplicationTag: tempTag ] as CFDictionary, nil) // ❌ Fails with -25303 guard status == errSecSuccess else { throw CertificateError.keychainError(status) } // 5. Would query for SecIdentity (never reached) // ... } Network Behavior When mTLS fails, console shows: Connection: asked for TLS Client Certificates Connection: received response for client certificates (-1 elements) Connection: providing TLS Client Identity (-1 elements) Task received response, status 403 The -1 elements indicates no certificates were provided. Entitlements <key>keychain-access-groups</key> <array> <string>$(AppIdentifierPrefix)com.ellin.tshios</string> </array> Keychain Sharing capability is enabled. What I've Tried Both kSecValueRef and kSecValueData approaches - same error Various kSecAttrAccessible values - same error Different keychain access groups - same error TestFlight build (vs dev build) - same error PKCS#12 creation - requires complex ASN.1/DER encoding, no iOS API Questions Is error -25303 expected when adding SecCertificate in development/TestFlight builds? Will App Store distribution resolve this? Or is there a fundamental limitation? Why does SecKey succeed but SecCertificate fails with identical entitlements? Is there an alternative to create SecIdentity without keychain access? Constraints Certificates come from server at runtime (cannot bundle) Need SecIdentity for URLSession client certificate authentication Server provides PEM format certificates Tested on: Simulator (dev), iPad Pro (dev), iPad Pro (TestFlight) - all fail Any insights appreciated - specifically whether this is a provisioning profile limitation that App Store distribution would resolve.

Hi everyone, We are currently exploring ways to implement a frictionless Wi-Fi setup for our hardware devices without requiring a dedicated third-party application. We are interested in leveraging Apple's WAC (Wireless Accessory Configuration) to sync Wi-Fi credentials directly from iOS devices. However, we have struggled to find comprehensive technical documentation or specifications regarding the WAC service. Could anyone point us to the official source for these materials? Additionally, we have a couple of technical questions: 1.We are testing WAC provisioning and found that the Home app can discover our device and successfully get it online. However, it always ends with a "Failed to add accessory" message. Does WAC support imply that a device should be addable via the Home app? If not, why is the Home app able to discover and start the setup for a non-HomeKit WAC device? 2. Our device is already Apple AirPlay certified. Does implementing WAC require additional standalone certification, or is it covered under the existing MFi/AirPlay certification umbrella? Any insights or guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!