I'm working on securing communication between an Authorization Plugin and an XPC daemon, and I’d appreciate some guidance on best practices and troubleshooting. The current design which, I’ve implemented a custom Authorization Plugin for step-up authentication, which is loaded by Authorization Services at the loginwindow (inside SecurityAgent). This plugin acts as an XPC client and connects to a custom XPC daemon. Setup Details 1. XPC Daemon Runs as root (LaunchDaemon) Not sandboxed (my understanding is that root daemons typically don’t run sandboxed—please correct me if this is wrong) Mach service: com.roboInc.AuthXpcDaemon Bundle identifier: com.roboInc.OfflineAuthXpcDaemon 2. Authorization Plugin Bundle identifier: com.roboInc.AuthPlugin Loaded by SecurityAgent during login 3. Code Signing Both plugin and daemon are signed using a development certificate What I’m Trying to Achieve I want to secure the XPC communication so that: The daemon only accepts connections from trusted clients The plugin only connects to the legitimate daemon Communication is protected against unauthorized access The Issue I'm facing I attempted to validate code signatures using: SecRequirementCreateWithString SecCodeCopyGuestWithAttributes SecCodeCheckValidity However, validation consistently fails with: -67050 (errSecCSReqFailed) Could you please help here What is the recommended way to securely authenticate an Authorization Plugin (running inside SecurityAgent) to a privileged XPC daemon? Since the plugin runs inside SecurityAgent, how can the daemon reliably distinguish my plugin from other plugins? What is the correct approach to building a SecRequirement in this scenario? Any guidance, examples, or pointers would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

System-wide deadlock in removexattr from revisiond / APFS We're experiencing a deadlock on certains systems when our software is installed, which is causing side effects in our process (and likely others) such as blocked queues and increased memory usage. According to the spindump, revisiond appears to be holding an exclusive lock within the kernel. Process: revisiond [426] UUID: 5E9B9E04-984B-31AD-A4FF-A1A90B7D53A1 Path: /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/GenerationalStorage.framework/Versions/A/Support/revisiond Codesigning ID: com.apple.revisiond Shared Cache: 25AE5A2A-FE2A-3998-8D4E-F3C5C6E6CEB6 slid base address 0x189834000, slide 0x9834000 (System Primary) Architecture: arm64e Parent: launchd [1] UID: 0 Sudden Term: Tracked Memory Limit: 50MB Jetsam Priority: 40 Footprint: 6225 KB Time Since Fork: 1740319s Num samples: 940 (1-940) Num threads: 5 Note: 1 idle work queue thread omitted [...] Thread 0xc0616d 940 samples (1-940) priority 46 (base 4) last ran 241692.754s ago 940 start_wqthread + 8 (libsystem_pthread.dylib + 7068) [0x189d0ab9c] 940 _pthread_wqthread + 292 (libsystem_pthread.dylib + 11852) [0x189d0be4c] 940 _dispatch_workloop_worker_thread + 692 (libdispatch.dylib + 85356) [0x189b65d6c] 940 _dispatch_root_queue_drain_deferred_wlh + 292 (libdispatch.dylib + 87156) [0x189b66474] 940 _dispatch_lane_invoke + 440 (libdispatch.dylib + 45048) [0x189b5bff8] 940 _dispatch_lane_serial_drain + 944 (libdispatch.dylib + 42420) [0x189b5b5b4] 940 _dispatch_client_callout + 16 (libdispatch.dylib + 113364) [0x189b6cad4] 940 _dispatch_call_block_and_release + 32 (libdispatch.dylib + 7004) [0x189b52b5c] 940 ??? (revisiond + 168768) [0x10494d340] 940 ??? (revisiond + 165940) [0x10494c834] 940 ??? (revisiond + 40264) [0x10492dd48] 940 ??? (revisiond + 56680) [0x104931d68] 940 <patched truncated backtrace> 940 removexattr + 8 (libsystem_kernel.dylib + 23768) [0x189cd1cd8] *940 ??? (kernel.release.t6000 + 15240) [0xfffffe000886fb88] *940 ??? (kernel.release.t6000 + 1886348) [0xfffffe0008a3888c] *940 ??? (kernel.release.t6000 + 7730436) [0xfffffe0008fcb504] *940 ??? (kernel.release.t6000 + 2759592) [0xfffffe0008b0dba8] *940 ??? (kernel.release.t6000 + 2808244) [0xfffffe0008b199b4] *940 apfs_vnop_removexattr + 1044 (apfs + 474512) [0xfffffe000be8d4d0] *940 decmpfs_cnode_set_vnode_state + 80 (kernel.release.t6000 + 2945816) [0xfffffe0008b3b318] *940 IORWLockWrite + 184 (kernel.release.t6000 + 496184) [0xfffffe00088e5238] *940 ??? (kernel.release.t6000 + 494624) [0xfffffe00088e4c20] *940 ??? (kernel.release.t6000 + 619452) [0xfffffe00089033bc] *940 ??? (kernel.release.t6000 + 624472) [0xfffffe0008904758] The bulk of the other processes are waiting for that lock. (suspended, blocked by krwlock for reading owned by revisiond [426] thread 0xc0616d) (blocked by krwlock for writing owned by revisiond [426] thread 0xc0616d) Around the time of the event, these messages were logged by revision: 2026-03-06 18:49:37.781673-0500 0x16b7 Error 0x7f92f364 426 14 revisiond: [com.apple.revisiond:default] [ERROR] CSCopyChunkIDsForToken failed for 41639 2026-03-06 18:49:37.781716-0500 0x16b7 Error 0x7f92f365 426 14 revisiond: [com.apple.revisiond:default] [ERROR] updateEntry for new entry <private> failed 2026-03-06 18:49:37.781738-0500 0x16b7 Error 0x7f92f366 426 14 revisiond: [com.apple.revisiond:default] [ERROR] no entry for '<private>' 2026-03-06 18:49:37.781754-0500 0x16b7 Error 0x7f92f367 426 14 revisiond: [com.apple.revisiond:default] [ERROR] failed assembleInfoForOffset for fsid 16777234 fileid 359684022 offset 0 size 14334 (path <private>) Our agent uses Endpoint Security Framework to monitor events, and provide anti-tamper functionality for installed components and processes. While several EndpointSecurity calls appear in the spindump stack traces, we don't have any evidence that any calls from revisiond were blocked. What we'd really like to to understand what that lock is (appears to be decompressing an object on an APFS volume), what revisiond and APFS are doing with it, and what might cause it to deadlock. Of note, one of our processes is also waiting on that lock, one thread for reading and the other for writing. This issue affects machines running several macOS versions (15.x, 26.x). The machine in the examples is running macOS 26.3 (25D125)

We now know the IsEligibleForAgeFeatures API is NOT returning True in Brazil at least 2 days past compliance date, and we don't know if that's the right API, or how it behaves. Folks here: Is there anyone here from Brazil who has tested out this 26.4 API? Has anyone tested out the regulatory feature API? Does it return something like declaredAgeRangeRequired? I don't know how to test it in Brazil without sandbox/physically in Brazil. Much appreciated!!

We’re using a private database with a custom zone. Record types and related schema are created programmatically rather than through the dashboard. When running the app in the development environment, I can see that data is saved and can be retrieved successfully. However, in the iCloud console, I don’t see any record types or even the custom zone. Additionally, I’m unable to deploy any schema to production because no changes are detected. Do you have any ideas on what we might be missing? Installing the app from TestFlight when trying to upload a record CloudKit reports this error: <CKError 0x13f40bb10: "Invalid Arguments" (12/2006); server message = "Cannot create new type MyType in production schema" ...>

I am trying to create an automation that will anable to add transactions to my app and it’s using a shared shortcut and a quick automation on the user end. it works great on the iPhone but i couldn’t find any way to make it work on my Apple Watch… any help with that?

Hello, I’m honestly trying to understand what’s going on with the Family Controls API review process. I submitted my entitlement request on March 5, and as of today (March 19), there has been zero response. I also opened a support ticket on March 16, and that hasn’t received any response either. What’s confusing is that updates to another app on the same developer account were approved within days so clearly the account is in good standing and active. At this point, it feels like there’s no visibility into what’s happening: Is the request under review? Is it waiting for additional information? Or is it just sitting in a queue indefinitely? I understand that Family Controls is a sensitive API, but a two-week silence with no status or communication makes it very difficult to plan or ship features. For those who’ve gone through this: How long did your approval actually take? Did you receive any communication during the process? Is there any reliable way to get visibility or speed this up? Right now, this is blocking a feature we’ve invested significant time building, and the lack of feedback is the most frustrating part. Would really appreciate any insights.

We have been using the purchase date to identify the latest transaction_id for a given original_transaction_id. However, I’ve noticed several cases where an immediate upgrade does not result in a later purchase date—in some instances, it is actually earlier than the previous transaction. Given this inconsistency, would it be more reliable to sort by transaction_id in descending order instead?

We're trying to create 26.4 beta and RC VMs on 15.x and 26.3 host OS' without success. We see Tue Mar 17 17:27:36 40 anka.log (install) 45803: failed to install macOS: Error Domain=VZErrorDomain Code=10006 "Installation requires a software update." UserInfo={NSLocalizedFailure=A software update is required to complete the installation., NSLocalizedFailureReason=Installation requires a software update.} Yet, if we create it the same way on 26.4 beta host OS, it works. We've tried the usual tricks of installing latest Xcode and preparing it (accepting license, etc). But, they don't work on 26.3 and 15.x. What's the trick to get the creation of 26.4 to work on <= 26.3 host OS?

We are developing a watchOS application that records long audio sessions and uploads them to our backend in chunks (~5 MB each) using pre-signed URLs and URLSession background upload. Current behavior: While audio recording is active, uploads continue successfully even when the app is in the background. Once the recording stops, if multiple chunks (e.g., 10+) are still pending, the remaining uploads do not proceed in the background and appear to be suspended. We attempted to use WKExtendedRuntimeSession (mindfulness type) to allow sufficient time to enqueue background upload tasks, but the session is invalidated when the app goes to the background (e.g., wrist down or app inactive), which prevents reliable scheduling of uploads. Additionally, we added the entitlement: com.apple.developer.extended-runtime-session (mindfulness) in the Watch app entitlements file, but Xcode automatic signing fails with: “Provisioning profile does not include the com.apple.developer.extended-runtime-session entitlement.” It appears that the provisioning profile is not being updated to include this entitlement. Our questions: Is WKExtendedRuntimeSession (mindfulness) expected to support scheduling background URLSession uploads after the app goes to background? How should we reliably complete pending background uploads on watchOS after a long recording session ends? Is there any additional entitlement or recommended approach for this use case? Why is the extended runtime entitlement not being applied to the provisioning profile despite being added in the entitlements file? We are aiming to follow Apple-recommended practices for long-running tasks and background uploads on watchOS. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Please take a look at: FB22280049

Hi everyone, I’m honestly trying to understand what’s going on with the Family Controls API review process. I submitted my entitlement request on March 5, and as of today (March 19), there has been zero response. I also opened a support ticket on March 16, and that hasn’t received any response either. What’s confusing is that updates to another app on the same developer account were approved within days — so clearly the account is in good standing and active. At this point, it feels like there’s no visibility into what’s happening: Is the request under review? Is it waiting for additional information? Or is it just sitting in a queue indefinitely? I understand that Family Controls is a sensitive API, but a two-week silence with no status or communication makes it very difficult to plan or ship features. For those who’ve gone through this: How long did your approval actually take? Did you receive any communication during the process? Is there any reliable way to get visibility or speed this up? Right now, this is blocking a feature we’ve invested significant time building, and the lack of feedback is the most frustrating part. This is really giving me pain. Would really appreciate any insights.

Hello everyone, a few months ago I started building an app using flutter, and a few days ago when I told one of my friends to test it trough Test Flight he asked me why it shows an 🟡 Yellow Circle in front of the app name ? is there an Apple documentation regarding this yellow circle so I can point others to that page ? I googled to find out about this behaviour and it says that my app uses the microphone, but I do not have any code, any library that is using the microphone, it is an Outdoor/GPS Recording app. Thank you.

By analysis the log, seems the following 3 calls has been ended by system callkit (Not mainly trigger the end call): @apple Do you have similar report that the iOS CallKit End the call withtour user action? Device info: iPhone18,1（iPhone 16 Pro） iOS 26.2 RCAppMobile/25.4.30.995 CTRadioAccessTechnologyNR（5G NR）

how to keep BG running while user killed app, because admin want to tracking inside/outside of employee

how to tracking location service while user killed app

As a company, we would like to implement digital passes in the Apple Wallet. We're wondering which option we should follow to be able to do so. Our company creates and manages access control devices to put on waste drop-off points. Our goal is to give the opportunity to our final users to unlock these drop-off points with their iphone. A contact told us to use the NFC & SE but this solution seems not to be available in France and not directly integrated with the Apple Wallet. We've seen Apple Wallet Access and Apple Wallet VAS as alternatives but we're not sure any of these two are really matching our usecase. We definitely want our passes to be directly integrated within the wallet, without an app.

I am attempting to configure appclips, but I am getting this error in App Store Connect. I created an app clips target in my project, I have checked the XCAsset files and it is included when archived and pushed to App Store Connect. In both my parent and my app clips target I've added the associated domains capabilities, with the following associated same domains for both targets: appclips:akin-server-side-staging.onrender.com appclips:akin-server-side.onrender.com applinks:akin-server-side-staging.onrender.com applinks:akin-server-side.onrender.com My server is configured to serve the following json at all permutations of the staging endpoints and prod endpoints for both well known and aasa without well known. Here is one of them: https://akin-server-side.onrender.com/.well-known/apple-app-site-association Here is the JSON it is returning: {"applinks":{"details":[{"appIDs":["8PJ28P9ZZ8.com.ElevatedUnderdogs.akin1"],"components":[{"\/":"\/appClips\/referral\/venueToUser\/*"}]}]},"appclips":{"apps":["8PJ28P9ZZ8.com.ElevatedUnderdogs.akin1.Clip"]}} And yet I'm still getting Invalid Entitlement: Unknown ID in the store.

The FindMy device is currently MFI certified, but we plan to support UWB ranging functionality in the Find My app, similar to AirTag. After searching for relevant information, I found the relevant UWB functions in this article "Nearby-Interaction-Accessory-Protocol-Specification-Release-R4", but we need to develop third-party applications ourselves. So how can we make it display distance and direction in the "Find My" app like AirTag does?

目前这个findmy 设备是已经通过MFI认证，不过后续想的在”Find My “应用上像 AirTag 一样支持UWB测距功能。 寻找了相关资料，在这篇文章《Nearby-Interaction-Accessory-Protocol-Specification-Release-R4》中找到了UWB的相关功能，但是需要我们自己开发第三方应用。 所以需要怎么做才可以做到像airtag 一样在“Find My”应用上显示距离和方向

Dear Sir/Madam, Thank you for your support. I have reviewed the documentation for Local Push Connectivity (see URL below) and, following the instruction in the "Important" section to "Request this entitlement from the Entitlement Request Page," I completed the application process for this Entitlement on March 11, 2026. [Local push connectivity] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/networkextension/local-push-connectivity?language=objc#Supporting-APNs-and-local-push-connectivity-in-one-app Subsequently, on March 13, 2026, I received the following reply from Apple: Sub : Re: Requesting Network Extension App Push Entitlement From: Local Push Review Sent: Friday, March 13, 2026 4:09 AM Hi, Thank you for your interest in the Local Push Connectivity entitlement. Your entitlement request has been approved for: Team ID: NWKYYYYYYY Technical documentation on this API is available here: -(Omission) - Best Regards, Apple Developer Relations My understanding is that upon approval of this application, an "Entitlements" field should be added to the input fields for creating provisioning profiles. However, as of today(March 18, 2026), it has not yet been added. Will the Entitlements field be added if I simply wait? My account (Apple ID), which submitted the application, belongs to three Team IDs. For convenience, I will refer to them as Team ID SV3XXXXXXX, Team ID NWKYYYYYYY, and Team ID WEJZZZZZZZ. The application status for Entitlements for each Team ID is as follows: Team ID SV3XXXXXXX Entitlements: Present. Applied for Entitlements on February 6, 2021. (Received "Re: Requesting Network Extension App Push Entitlement" email on February 6, 2021) Team ID NWKYYYYYYY Entitlements: Not present. Applied for Entitlements on March 13, 2026. (Received "Re: Requesting Network Extension App Push Entitlement" email on March 13, 2026) Team ID WEJZZZZZZZ Entitlements: Present. No record (email) of applying for Entitlements. Because of this, I am concerned that the Entitlements applied for Team ID NWKYYYYYYY may have been mistakenly granted to Team ID WEJZZZZZZZ, and I am inquiring about this. Will the Entitlements field for Team ID NWKYYYYYYY be added if I simply wait? Thank you in advance.