Overview

I often get questions about third-party crash reporting. These usually show up in one of two contexts: Folks are trying to implement their own crash reporter. Folks have implemented their own crash reporter and are trying to debug a problem based on the report it generated. This is a complex issue and this post is my attempt to untangle some of that complexity. If you have a follow-up question about anything I've raised here, please put it in a new thread with the Debugging tag. IMPORTANT All of the following is my own direct experience. None of it should be considered official DTS policy. If you have a specific question that needs a direct answer — perhaps you’re trying to convince your boss that implementing your own crash reporter is a very bad idea — start a dedicated thread here on the forums and we can discuss the details there. Use whatever subtopic is appropriate for your issue, but make sure to add the Debugging tag so that I see it go by. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com" Scope First, I can only speak to the technical side of this issue. There are other aspects that are beyond my remit: I don’t work for App Review, and only they can give definitive answers about what will or won’t be allowed on the store. Implementing your own crash reporter has significant privacy implications. IMPORTANT If you implement your own crash reporter, discuss the privacy impact with a lawyer. This post assumes that you are implementing your own crash reporter. A lot of folks use a crash reporter from another third party. From my perspective these are the same thing. If you use a custom crash reporter, you are responsible for its behaviour, both good and bad, regardless of where the actual code came from. Note If you use a crash reporter from another third party, run the tests outlined in Preserve the Apple Crash Report to verify that it’s working well. General Advice I strongly advise against implementing your own crash reporter. It’s very easy to create a basic crash reporter that works well enough to debug simple problems. It’s impossible to implement a good crash reporter, one that’s reliable, binary compatible, and sufficient to debug complex problems. The bulk of this post is a low-level explanation of that impossibility. Rather than attempting the impossible, I recommend that you lean in to Apple’s crash reporter. In recent years it’s acquired some really cool new features: If you’re creating an App Store app, the Xcode organiser gives you easy, interactive access to Apple crash reports. If you’re an enterprise developer, consider switching to Custom App Distribution. This yields all the benefits of App Store distribution without your app being generally available on the store. iOS 14 and macOS 12 report crashes in MetricKit. This is a very cool feature, and I’m surprised by how few people use it effectively. If you previously dismissed Apple crash reports as insufficient, I encourage you to reconsider that decision. Why Is This Impossible? Earlier I said “It’s impossible to implement a good crash reporter”, and I want to explain why I’m confident enough in my conclusions to use that specific word. There are two fundamental problems here: On iOS (and the other iOS-based platforms, watchOS and tvOS) your crash reporter must run inside the crashed process. That means it can never be 100% reliable. If the process is crashing then, by definition, it’s in an undefined state. Attempting to do real work in that state is just asking for problems [1]. To get good results your crash reporter must be intimately tied to system implementation details. These can change from release to release, which invalidates the assumptions made by your crash reporter. This isn’t a problem for the Apple crash reporter because it ships with the system. However, a crash reporter that’s built in to your product is always going to be brittle. I’m speaking from hard-won experience here. I worked for DTS during the PowerPC-to-Intel transition, and saw a lot of folks with custom crash reporters struggle through that process. Still, this post exists because lots of folks ignore this reality, so the subsequent sections contain advice about specific technical issues. WARNING Do not interpret any of the following as encouragement to implement your own crash reporter. I strongly advise against that. However, if you ignore my advice then you should at least try to minimise the risk, which is what the rest of this document is about. [1] On macOS it’s possible for your crash reporter to run out of process, just like the Apple crash reporter. However, possible is not the same as easy. In fact, running out of process can make things worse: It prevents you from geting critical state for the crashed process without being tightly bound to OS implementation details. It would be nice if Apple provided APIs for this sort of thing, but that’s currently not the case. Preserve the Apple Crash Report You must ensure that your crash reporter doesn’t disrupt the Apple crash reporter. This is important for three reasons: Some fraction of your crashes will not be caused by your code but by problems in framework code, and accurate Apple crash reports are critical in diagnosing such issues. When dealing with really hard-to-debug problems, you need the more obscure info that’s shown in the Apple crash report. If you’re working with someone from Apple (here on the forums, via a bug report, or a DTS case, or whatever), they’re going to want an accurate Apple crash report. If your crash reporter is disrupting the Apple crash reporter — either preventing it from generating crash reports entirely [1], or distorting those crash reports — that limits how much they can help you. IMPORTANT This is not a theoretical concern. The forums have many threads where I’ve been unable to help folks debug a gnarly problem because their third-party crash reporter didn’t preserve the Apple crash report (see here, here, and here for some examples). To avoid these issues I recommend that you test your crash reporter’s impact on the Apple crash reporter. The basic idea is: Create a program that generates a set of specific crashes. Run through each crash. Verify that your crash reporter produces sensible results. Verify that the Apple crash reporter produces the same results as it does without your crash reporter With regards step 1, your test suite should include: An un-handled language exception thrown by your code An un-handled language exception thrown by the OS (accessing an NSArray out of bounds is an easy way to get this) Various machine exceptions (at a minimum, memory access, illegal instruction, and breakpoint exceptions) Stack overflow Make sure to test all of these cases on both the main thread and a secondary thread. With regards step 4, check that the resulting Apple crash report includes correct values for: The exception info The crashed thread That thread’s state Any application-specific info, and especially the last exception backtrace [1] A particularly pathological behaviour here is to end your crash reporter by calling exit. This completely suppresses the Apple crash report. Some third-party language runtimes ‘helpfully’ include such a crash reporter, which makes it very hard to debug problems that occur within your process but outside of that language. Signals Many third-party crash reporters use UNIX signals to catch the crash. This is a shame because using Mach exception handling, the mechanism used by the Apple crash reporter, is generally a better option. However, there are two reasons to favour UNIX signals over Mach exception handling: On iOS-based platforms your crash reporter must run in-process, and doing in-process Mach exception handling is not feasible. Folks are a lot more familiar with UNIX signals. Mach exception handling, and Mach messaging in general, is pretty darned obscure. If you use UNIX signals for your crash reporter, be aware that this API has some gaping pitfalls. First and foremost, your signal handler can only use async signal safe functions [1]. You can find a list of these functions in sigaction man page [2] [3]. WARNING This list does not include malloc. This means that a crash reporter’s signal handler cannot use Objective-C or Swift, as there’s no way to constrain how those language runtimes allocate memory [4]. That means you’re stuck with C or C++, but even there you have to be careful to comply with this constraint. The Operative: It’s worse than you know. Captain Malcolm Reynolds: It usually is. Many crash reports use functions like backtrace (see its man page) to get a backtrace from their signal handler. There’s two problems with this: backtrace is not an async signal safe function. backtrace uses a naïve algorithm that doesn’t deal well with cross signal handler stack frames [5]. The latter point is particularly worrying, because it hides the identity of the stack frame that triggered the signal. If you’re going to backtrace out of a signal, you must use the crashed thread’s state (accessible via the handlers uap parameter) to start your backtrace. Apropos that, if your crash reporter wants to log the state of the crashed thread, that’s the place to get it. Your signal handler must be prepared to be called by multiple threads. A typical crashing signal (like SIGSEGV) is delivered to the thread that triggered the machine exception. While your signal handler is running on that thread, other threads in your process continue to run. One of these threads could crash, causing it to call your signal handler. It’s a good idea to suspend all threads in your process early in your signal handler. However, there’s no way to completely eliminate this window. Note The need to suspend all the other threads in your process is further evidence that sticking to async signal safe functions is required. An unsafe function might depend on a thread you’ve suspended. A typical crashing signal is delivered on the thread that triggered the machine exception. If the machine exception was caused by a stack overflow, the system won’t have enough stack space to call your signal handler. You can tell the system to switch to an alternative stack (see the discussion of SA_ONSTACK in the sigaction man page) but that isn’t a complete solution (because of the thread issue discussed immediately above). Finally, there’s the question of how to exit from your signal handler. You must not call exit. There’s two problems with doing that: exit is not async signal safe. In fact, exit can run arbitrary code via handlers registered with atexit. If you want to exit the process, call _exit. Exiting the process is a bad idea anyway, because it will prevent the Apple crash reporter from running. This is very poor form. For an explanation as to why, see Preserve the Apple Crash Report (above). A better solution is to unregister your signal handler (set it to SIG_DFL) and then return. This will cause the crashed process to continue execution, crash again, and generate a crash report via the Apple crash reporter. [1] While the common signals caught by a crash reporter are not technically async signals (except SIGABRT), you still have to treat them as async signals because they can occur on any thread at any time. [2] It’s reasonable to extend this list to other routines that are implemented as thin shims on a system call. For example, I have no qualms about calling vm_read (see below) from a signal handler. [3] Be aware, however, that even this list has caveats. See my Async Signal Safe Functions vs Dyld Lazy Binding post for details. [4] I expect that it’ll eventually be possible to write signal handlers in Swift, possibly using some facility that evolves from the the existing, but unsupported, @_noAllocation and @_noLocks attributes. If you’d like to get involved with that effort, I recommend that engage with the Swift Evolution process. [5] Cross signal handler stack frames are pushed on to the stack by the kernel when it runs a signal handler on a thread. As there’s no API to learn about the structure of these frames, there’s no way to backtrace across one of these frames in isolation. I’m happy to go into details but it’s really not relevant to this discussion [6]. If you’re interested, start a new thread with the Debugging tag and we can chat there. [6] (Arg, my footnotes have footnotes!) The exception to this is where your trying to generate a crash report for code running in a signal handler. That’s not easy, and frankly you’re better off avoiding signal handlers in general. Where possible, handle signals via a Dispatch event source. Reading Memory A signal handler must be very careful about the memory it touches, because the contents of that memory might have been corrupted by the crash that triggered the signal. My general rule here is that the signal handler can safely access: Its code Its stack (subject to the constraints discussed earlier) Its arguments Immutable global state In the last point, I’m using immutable to mean immutable after startup. It’s reasonable to set up some global state when the process starts, before installing your signal handler, and then rely on it in your signal handler. Changing any global state after the signal handler is installed is dangerous, and if you need to do that you must be careful to ensure that your signal handler sees consistent state, even though a crash might occur halfway through your change. You can’t protect this global state with a mutex because mutexes are not async signal safe (and even if they were you’d deadlock if the mutex was held by the thread that crashed). You should be able to use atomic operations for this, but atomic operations are notoriously hard to use correctly (if I had a dollar for every time I’ve pointed out to a developer they’re using atomic operations incorrectly, I’d be very badly paid (-: but that’s still a lot of developers!). If your signal handler reads other memory, it must take care to avoid crashing while doing that read. There’s no BSD-level API for this [1], so I recommend that you use vm_read. [1] The traditional UNIX approach for doing this is to install a signal handler to catch any memory access exceptions triggered by the read, but now we’re talking signal handling within a signal handler and that’s just silly. Writing Files If your want to write a crash report from your signal handler, you must use low-level UNIX APIs (open, write, close) because only those low-level APIs are documented to be async signal safe. You must also set up the path in advance because the standard APIs for determining where to write the file (NSFileManager, for example) are not async signal safe. Offline Symbolication Do not attempt to do symbolication from your signal handler. Rather, write enough information to your crash report to support offline symbolication. Specifically: The addresses to symbolicate For each Mach-O image in the process: The image’s path The image’s build UUID [1] The image’s load address You can get most of the Mach-O image information using the APIs in <mach-o/dyld.h> [2]. Be aware, however, that these APIs are not async signal safe. You’ll need to get this information in advance and cache it for your signal handler to record. This is complicated by the fact that the list of Mach-O images can change as you process loads and unloads code. This requires you to share mutable state with your signal handler, which is exactly what I recommend against in Reading Memory. Note You can learn about images loading and unloading using _dyld_register_func_for_add_image and _dyld_register_func_for_remove_image respectively. [1] If you’re unfamiliar with that term, see TN3178 Checking for and resolving build UUID problems and the documents it links to. [2] I believe you’ll need to parse the Mach-O load commands to get the build UUID. What to Include When deciding what to include in a crash report, there’s a three-way balance to be struck: The more information you include, the easier it is to diagnose problems. Some information is hard to obtain, either because there’s no public API to get that information, or because the API is not available to your crash reporter. Some information is so privacy-sensitive that it has no place in a crash report. Apple’s crash reporter strikes its own balance here, and I recommend that you try to include everything that it includes, subject to the limitations described in the second point. Here’s what I’d considered to be a minimal list: Information about the machine exception that triggered the crash For memory access exceptions, the address of the access that triggered the crash Backtraces of all the threads (sometimes the backtrace of a non-crashing thread can yield critical information about the crash) The crashed thread Its thread state A list of Mach-O images, as discussed in the Offline Symbolication section IMPORTANT Make sure you report the thread backtraces in a consistent order. Without that it’s hard to correlate information across crash reports. Revision History 2025-08-25 Added some links to examples of third-party crash reports not preserving the Apple crash report. Added a link to TN3178. Made other minor editorial changes. 2022-05-16 Fixed a broken link. 2021-09-10 Expanded the General Advice section to include pointers to Apple crash report resources, including MetricKit. Split the second half of that section out in to a new Why Is This Impossible? section. Made minor editoral changes. 2021-02-27 Fixed the formatting. Made minor editoral changes. 2019-05-13 Added a reference to my Async Signal Safe Functions vs Dyld Lazy Binding post. 2019-02-15 Expanded the introduction to the Preserve the Apple Crash Report section. 2019-02-14 Clarified the complexities of an out-of-process crash reporter. Added the What to Include section. Enhanced the Signals section to cover reentrancy and stack overflow. Made minor editoral changes. 2019-02-13 Made minor editoral changes. Added a new footnote to the Signals section. 2019-02-12 First posted.

Hi all, Recently, I received feedback from users that the cell of UITableView will be enlarged when clicked on the iOS26 system. After positioning, it was found that the iOS26 system has reset the frame of the contentView so that its width is always the screen width. The following Demo can reproduce this problem. Does anyone have this problem? Is there a solution? Thanks Run and click on the cell to see the problem http://www.yangshuang.net/TestProject.zip

Hello All, It’s been almost a month, and I’m trying to submit my app’s first version, but I keep getting rejections with the reason “App Completeness – No Connectivity.” Here’s the timeline: • Initially, the app was rejected for app completeness. • I scheduled a review appointment, and during that session, the reviewer confirmed the app was working fine. • The reviewer only asked for permission policy changes, which I implemented and resubmitted. • After resubmission, the app was rejected again with the same “App Completeness – No Connectivity” issue. The reviewer in the first session mentioned it might have been a connectivity issue on the device during testing. So, I scheduled another review appointment, but that appointment request was declined. To date, I have made 13 submissions, and 10 were rejected for the same reason. I have also raised multiple appeals, but haven’t received any response. The app works perfectly on multiple devices and iOS versions, and TestFlight testing is successful. Has anyone faced this issue before? How can I resolve this and prevent repeated rejections? Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you.

Good day) Colleagues, please tell me how can I change the notification on the locked screen "pass changed" in PKPASS when changing several fields? Thank you very much for your answer

I have an app using TabView with multiple Tabs using tabViewStyle „sidebarAdaptable“. Each Tab does have its own NavigationStack. When I switch multiple times between the tabs and append a child view to one of my navigation stacks, it will stop working after a few tries with the following error „A NavigationLink is presenting a value of type “HomeStack” but there is no matching navigationDestination declaration visible from the location of the link. The link cannot be activated. Note: Links search for destinations in any surrounding NavigationStack, then within the same column of a NavigationSplitView.“ The same code is working fine on iOS, iPadOS but not working on macOS. When I remove tabViewStyle of sidebarAdaptable it’s also working on macOS. I shrinked it down to a minimal reproducible code sample. Any idea if that is a bug or I'm doing something wrong? struct ContentView: View { @State private var appState: AppState = .init() var body: some View { TabView(selection: $appState.rootTab) { Tab("Home", systemImage: "house", value: RootTab.home) { NavigationStack(path: $appState.homeStack) { Text("Home Stack") NavigationLink("Item 1", value: HomeStack.item1) .padding() NavigationLink("Item 2", value: HomeStack.item2) .padding() .navigationDestination(for: HomeStack.self) { stack in Text("Stack \(stack.rawValue)") } .navigationTitle("HomeStack") } } Tab("Tab1", systemImage: "gear", value: RootTab.tab1) { NavigationStack(path: $appState.tab1Stack) { Text("Tab 1 Stack") NavigationLink("Item 1", value: Tab1Stack.item1) .padding() NavigationLink("Item 2", value: Tab1Stack.item2) .padding() .navigationDestination(for: Tab1Stack.self) { stack in Text("Stack \(stack.rawValue)") } .navigationTitle("Tab1Stack") } } } .tabViewStyle(.sidebarAdaptable) .onChange(of: appState.rootTab) { _, _ in appState.homeStack.removeAll() appState.tab1Stack.removeAll() } } } @MainActor @Observable class AppState { var rootTab: RootTab = .home var homeStack: [HomeStack] = [] var tab1Stack: [Tab1Stack] = [] } enum RootTab: Hashable { case home case tab1 case tab2 } enum HomeStack: String, Hashable { case home case item1 case item2 } enum Tab1Stack: String, Hashable { case home case item1 case item2 }

I'm looking for a way to implement Liquid Glass effect in a Text, and I have issues. If I want to do gradient effect in a Text, no problem, like below. Text("Liquid Glass") .font(Font.system(size: 30, weight: .bold)) .multilineTextAlignment(.center) .foregroundStyle( LinearGradient( colors: [.blue, .mint, .green], startPoint: .leading, endPoint: .trailing ) ) But I cannot make sure that I can apply the .glassEffect with .mask or .foregroundStyle. The Glass type and Shape type argument looks like not compatible with the Text shape itself. Any solution to do this effect on Text ? Thanks in advance for your answers.

Does WeatherKit Rest api have the following forecast endpoints? Pollen and Flu Air quality Radar forecast served through a REST API? Hail Solar energy Frost Potential Index

If I upload my app with included plugins with no dsyms for the bundles I get a warning message that there are no dysms. If I select DWARF + dsyms, I get a warning saying it can't find them, even though they are there in the resource file with the correct UUID For example: The archive did not include a dSYM for the BIS.bundle with the UUIDs [6481C68F-CEE4-33B5-8631-E03251E48FF2, C7482559-F72A-3510-A5B9-00C24F376CD9]. Ensure that the archive's dSYM folder includes a DWARF file for BIS.bundle with the expected UUIDs. When you choose Get Info on the dsym it shows the UUIDs that the AppStore allegedly can't find. Any ideas?

If we use webView.loadFileURL(indexURL, allowingReadAccessTo: readAccessURL) on an iPad it loads the data and navigation works. But if we place two hands on top of the screen and move a bit, all click events are not working anymore. It works again if we call loadFileURL again. We filled a bug report: FB19812304

We’ve run into what looks like a gap in how forceAirDropUnmanaged is enforced on iOS devices. Setup: Device: iOS 17.x (unsupervised, enrolled in MDM) MDM Restriction: forceAirDropUnmanaged = true Managed Open-In restriction also applied (block unmanaged destinations). Verified: from a managed app, the AirDrop icon is hidden in the share sheet. This part works as expected. Issue: When two iOS devices are brought close together, the proximity-initiated AirDrop / NameDrop flow still allows transfer of photos, videos, or files between devices. In this path, forceAirDropUnmanaged does not appear to apply, even though the same restriction works correctly in the standard sharing pane. What I’d expect: If forceAirDropUnmanaged is enabled, all AirDrop transfer paths (including proximity/NameDrop) should be treated as unmanaged, and thus blocked when “Managed Open-In to unmanaged destinations” is restricted. What I observe instead: Share sheet → AirDrop hidden ✅ Proximity/NameDrop → transfer still possible ❌ Questions for Apple / Community: Is this a known limitation or expected behavior? Is there a different restriction key (or combination) that also covers proximity-based AirDrop? If not currently supported, should this be filed as Feedback (FB) to request alignment between share sheet AirDrop and NameDrop enforcement? This behaviour introduces a compliance gap for organisations relying on MDM to control data exfiltration on unsupervised or user-enrolled devices. Any clarification or guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Feedback ID: FB19846667 When dismissing a Menu view when the device is set to dark appearance, there is a flash of lightness that is distracting and feels unnatural. This becomes an issue for apps that rely on the user interacting with Menu views often. When using the overflow menu on a toolbar, the effect of dismissing the menu is a lot more natural and there is less flashing. I expect a similar visual effect when creating Menu views outside of a toolbar. Has anyone found a way around this somehow? Comparison between dismissing a menu and a toolbar overflow: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/H2gUQOwos3Y Slowed down version of dismissing a menu with a visible light flash: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/MBCCkK-GfqY

JAX Metal shows 55x slower random number generation compared to NVIDIA CUDA on equivalent workloads. This makes Monte Carlo simulations and scientific computing impractical on Apple Silicon. Performance Comparison NVIDIA GPU: 0.475s for 12.6M random elements M1 Max Metal: 26.3s for same workload Performance gap: 55x slower Environment Apple M1 Max, 64GB RAM, macOS Sequoia Version 15.6.1 JAX 0.4.34, jax-metal latest Backend: Metal Reproduction Code import time import jax import jax.numpy as jnp from jax import random key = random.PRNGKey(42) start_time = time.time() random_array = random.normal(key, (50000, 252)) duration = time.time() - start_time print(f"Duration: {duration:.3f}s")

General: Forums subtopic: App & System Services > Networking TN3151 Choosing the right networking API Networking Overview document — Despite the fact that this is in the archive, this is still really useful. TLS for App Developers forums post Choosing a Network Debugging Tool documentation WWDC 2019 Session 712 Advances in Networking, Part 1 — This explains the concept of constrained networking, which is Apple’s preferred solution to questions like How do I check whether I’m on Wi-Fi? TN3135 Low-level networking on watchOS TN3179 Understanding local network privacy Adapt to changing network conditions tech talk Understanding Also-Ran Connections forums post Extra-ordinary Networking forums post Foundation networking: Forums tags: Foundation, CFNetwork URL Loading System documentation — NSURLSession, or URLSession in Swift, is the recommended API for HTTP[S] on Apple platforms. Network framework: Forums tag: Network Network framework documentation — Network framework is the recommended API for TCP, UDP, and QUIC on Apple platforms. Building a custom peer-to-peer protocol sample code (aka TicTacToe) Implementing netcat with Network Framework sample code (aka nwcat) Configuring a Wi-Fi accessory to join a network sample code Moving from Multipeer Connectivity to Network Framework forums post Network Extension (including Wi-Fi on iOS): See Network Extension Resources Wi-Fi Fundamentals TN3111 iOS Wi-Fi API overview Wi-Fi Aware framework documentation Wi-Fi on macOS: Forums tag: Core WLAN Core WLAN framework documentation Wi-Fi Fundamentals Secure networking: Forums tags: Security Apple Platform Security support document Preventing Insecure Network Connections documentation — This is all about App Transport Security (ATS). Available trusted root certificates for Apple operating systems support article Requirements for trusted certificates in iOS 13 and macOS 10.15 support article About upcoming limits on trusted certificates support article Apple’s Certificate Transparency policy support article What’s new for enterprise in iOS 18 support article — This discusses new key usage requirements. Technote 2232 HTTPS Server Trust Evaluation Technote 2326 Creating Certificates for TLS Testing QA1948 HTTPS and Test Servers Miscellaneous: More network-related forums tags: 5G, QUIC, Bonjour On FTP forums post Using the Multicast Networking Additional Capability forums post Investigating Network Latency Problems forums post WirelessInsights framework documentation iOS Network Signal Strength Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = "eskimo" + "1" + "@" + "apple.com"

Hi, is it me or latest beta has pronlem with brightness? i have iPhone 16 pro, and now i must keep disabled auto brightness , at keep slider more or less at maximum, in order to clearly see the screen. fabrizio

Hello everyone, I'm encountering a persistent 503 Server Temporarily Not Available error when trying to implement "Sign in with Apple" for my web application. I've already performed a full review of my configuration and I'm confident it's set up correctly, which makes this server-side error particularly confusing. Problem Description: Our web application uses Firebase Authentication to handle the "Sign in with Apple" flow. When a user clicks the sign-in button, they are correctly redirected to the appleid.apple.com authorization page. However, instead of seeing the login prompt, the page immediately displays a 503 Server Temporarily Not Available error. This is the redirect URL being generated (with the state parameter truncated for security): https://appleid.apple.com/auth/authorize?response_type=code&client_id=XXXXXX&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2FXXXXXX.firebaseapp.com%2F__%2Fauth%2Fhandler&state=AMbdmDk...&scope=email%20name&response_mode=form_post Troubleshooting Steps Performed: Initially, I was receiving an invalid_client error, which prompted me to meticulously verify every part of my setup. I have confirmed the following: App ID Configuration: The "Sign in with Apple" capability is enabled for our primary App ID. Services ID Configuration: We have a Services ID configured specifically for this. The "Sign in with Apple" feature is enabled on this Services ID. The domain is registered and verified under "Domains and Subdomains". Firebase Settings Match Apple Settings: The Services ID from Apple is used as the Client ID in our Firebase configuration. The Team ID is correct. We have generated a private key, and both the Key ID and the .p8 file have been correctly uploaded to Firebase. The key is not revoked in the Apple Developer portal. Since the redirect to Apple is happening with the correct client_id and redirect_uri, and the error is a 5xx server error (not a 4xx client error like invalid_client), I believe our configuration is correct and the issue might be on Apple's end. This has been happening consistently for some time. My Questions: What could be causing a persistent 503 Server Temporarily Not Available error on the /auth/authorize endpoint when all client-side configurations appear to be correct? What is the formal process for opening a technical support ticket (TSI) directly with Apple Developer Support for an issue like this? Thank you for any insights or help you can provide.

Description: Hello, I recently received the following email from Apple: We're writing to inform you that your company isn't in compliance with the Apple Developer Program License Agreement (DPLA). Section 11.2 (Termination) states: (g) if You engage, or encourage others to engage, in any misleading, fraudulent, improper, unlawful or dishonest act relating to this Agreement, including, but not limited to, misrepresenting the nature of Your Application (e.g., hiding or trying to hide functionality from Apple’s review, falsifying consumer reviews for Your Application, engaging in payment fraud, etc.). Be aware that manipulating App Store chart rankings, user reviews or search index may result in the loss of your developer program membership. Please address this issue promptly. I’m trying to understand how other developers handled this warning. Could you please share your experience: Did you identify what triggered the warning? Did you need to remove or change anything in your apps? Did Apple require a formal response or evidence? How did you confirm that the issue was resolved? Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Hi everyone, I am new to Apply Pay, but I have already implemented IAP for subscriptions in my app. My app also has other functionalities, it also acts as a person-to-person marketplace, as users can post events or online courses which can be bought by other users to participate. My question is that I have read Apple's review guidelines but it is still unclear for me if I can use Apple Pay (with for example Stripe) or do I still need to use IAP for this online content. Also non profit organizations also can register which can recieve donations, can I also use Apple Pay for that or do I still need IAP there, because it would be nice if Apple would take 30% of donations.

Summary In a SwiftUI drag-and-drop flow, the only robust way I’ve found to detect cancellation (user drops outside any destination) is to rely on the NSItemProvider created in .onDrag and run cleanup when it’s deallocated, via a custom onEnded callback tied to its lifecycle. On iOS 26, the provider appears to be deallocated immediately after .onDrag returns (unless I keep a strong reference), so a deinit/onEnded-based cancel hook fires right away and no longer reflects the true end of the drag session. I’d like to know: 1. Is there a supported, reliable way to detect when a drag ends outside any drop target so I can cancel and restore the source row? 2. Is the iOS 26 NSItemProvider deallocation timing a bug/regression or intended behavior? Minimal SwiftUI Repro This example shows: • creating a custom NSItemProvider subclass with an onEnded closure • retaining it to avoid immediate dealloc (behavior change on iOS 26) • using performDrop to mark the drag as finished import SwiftUI import UniformTypeIdentifiers final class DragProvider: NSItemProvider { var onEnded: (() -> Void)? deinit { // Historically: called when the system drag session ended (drop or cancel). // On iOS 26: can fire immediately after .onDrag returns unless the provider is retained. onEnded?() } } struct ContentView: View { struct Item: Identifiable, Equatable { let id = UUID(); let title: String } @State private var pool: [Item] = (1...4).map { .init(title: "Option \($0)") } @State private var picked: [Item] = [] @State private var dragged: Item? @State private var dropFinished: Bool = true @State private var activeProvider: DragProvider? // Retain to avoid immediate dealloc private let dragType: UTType = .plainText var body: some View { HStack(spacing: 24) { // Destination list (accepts drops) VStack(alignment: .leading, spacing: 8) { Text("Picked").bold() VStack(spacing: 8) { ForEach(picked) { item in row(item) } } .padding() .background(RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 8).strokeBorder(.quaternary)) .onDrop(of: [dragType], delegate: Dropper( picked: $picked, pool: $pool, dragged: $dragged, dropFinished: $dropFinished, activeProvider: $activeProvider )) } .frame(maxWidth: .infinity, alignment: .topLeading) // Source list (draggable) VStack(alignment: .leading, spacing: 8) { Text("Pool").bold() VStack(spacing: 8) { ForEach(pool) { item in row(item) .onDrag { startDrag(item) return makeProvider(for: item) } preview: { row(item).opacity(0.9).frame(width: 200, height: 44) } .overlay( RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 8) .fill(item == dragged ? Color(.systemBackground) : .clear) // keep space ) } } .padding() .background(RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 8).strokeBorder(.quaternary)) } .frame(maxWidth: .infinity, alignment: .topLeading) } .padding() } private func row(_ item: Item) -> some View { RoundedRectangle(cornerRadius: 8) .strokeBorder(.secondary) .frame(height: 44) .overlay( HStack { Text(item.title); Spacer(); Image(systemName: "line.3.horizontal") } .padding(.horizontal, 12) ) } // MARK: Drag setup private func startDrag(_ item: Item) { dragged = item dropFinished = false } private func makeProvider(for item: Item) -> NSItemProvider { let provider = DragProvider(object: item.id.uuidString as NSString) // NOTE: If we DO NOT retain this provider on iOS 26, // its deinit can run immediately (onEnded fires too early). activeProvider = provider provider.onEnded = { [weak self] in // Intended: run when system drag session ends (drop or cancel). // Observed on iOS 26: may run too early unless retained; // if retained, we lose a reliable "session ended" signal here. DispatchQueue.main.async { guard let self else { return } if let d = self.dragged, self.dropFinished == false { // Treat as cancel: restore the source item if !self.pool.contains(d) { self.pool.append(d) } self.picked.removeAll { $0 == d } } self.dragged = nil self.dropFinished = true self.activeProvider = nil } } return provider } // MARK: DropDelegate private struct Dropper: DropDelegate { @Binding var picked: [Item] @Binding var pool: [Item] @Binding var dragged: Item? @Binding var dropFinished: Bool @Binding var activeProvider: DragProvider? func validateDrop(info: DropInfo) -> Bool { dragged != nil } func performDrop(info: DropInfo) -> Bool { guard let item = dragged else { return false } if let idx = pool.firstIndex(of: item) { pool.remove(at: idx) } picked.append(item) // Mark drag as finished so provider.onEnded won’t treat it as cancel dropFinished = true dragged = nil activeProvider = nil return true } } } Questions Is there a documented, source-side callback (or best practice) to know the drag session ended without any performDrop so we can cancel and restore the item? Has the NSItemProvider deallocation timing (for the object returned from .onDrag) changed intentionally on iOS 26? If so, what’s the recommended replacement signal? Is there a SwiftUI-native event to observe the end of a drag session that doesn’t depend on the provider’s lifecycle?

Hi, i'm using the PasteButton component to paste content from clipboard. On the docs it says that the PasteButton will handle internally permissions and will not present the prompt. But in my case seems to be not true. I removed all the occurrencies of UIPasteboard.general.string since i read that this will cause the prompt to appear. Also as you can see on the code below i'm not doing fancy or weird things, even with the base component this behaviour is still there. PasteButton(payloadType: String.self) { strings in if let first = strings.first { print("clipboard text: \(first)") } } I can see other apps using this paste button without asking for permissions every time, but i cannot see any issue in my code.

i am having problems done everything 18.5 connects but when i connect ios 26 it pick phone up but does nothing never had this problem before on any other beta