Search results for

missing package product

51,063 results found

Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

KeyChain Sharing with App Extensions
Hi, We are trying to use Apple Security API for KeyChain Services. The motive is to store some sensitive data in the KeyChain. Our app has Network extensions enabled which share a common app group and we want to access the data stored in the KeyChain from the extensions as well. Specifically we were exploring the SecItemAdd, SecItemCopyMatching etc family of APIs. We tried a few methods: Using the common App Group : Specifying the common app group in the kSecAttrAccessGroup field of the KeyChain query, allowed us to have a shared keychains for different apps (targets) in the app group, but this did not work for extensionsEnabling the KeyChain Sharing capability : We enabled the KeyChain Sharing Ability in the extensions and the app target as well, giving a common KeyChain Access group. Specifying this in the kSecAttrAccessGroup field also did not work.We tried specifying $AppIdentifier.KeyChainSharingGroup in the kSecAttrAccessGroup field , but this did not work as wellThe error code which we get in all these
2
0
1.4k
2w
Resources for Retro style Games wanting 90 degree Window corners
I've been thinking of bringing some older games back to the modern Mac. Rewriting old titles in Swift but using the original data files that assume use of non-rounded corners Windows. Many of these games require all the Window space of a 90 degree cornered Window. Can anyone point me at some useful workarounds or Is Apple simply deaf to the needs of this type of product?
2
0
451
2w
macOS 26.1 Tahoe on ARM: FinderSync extension does not work
When running the currently latest version of macOS (26.1) on a machine with ARM CPU (I could not reproduce the issue with Intel-Based machines) Finder Sync extensions do not work any more in general. Steps to reproduce the problem: In Xcode create a new macOS App project with default settings (in my case I chose XIB for the UI and Objective-C as language, and disabled testing, but that should not make any difference) In Xcode add a new target / Finder Sync Extension to the project with default settings, this adds a new Finder Sync Extension with example code to the app. Run the application and open Finder and navigate to /Users/Shared/MySyncExtension Documents In the system settings (Login Items & Extensions) enable the extension (Listed as File Provider). On systems where it is working, in the context menu of that folder an entry Example Menu Item will appear. On systems where it does not work it is missing. Some findings: Adding the *.appex with pluginkit -a registers the extension as expected,
10
0
284
2w
iCloud Container Cannot Enable in Xcode — App ID Won’t Accept Container / Missing iCloud Documents Toggle
Hi everyone, I am experiencing an iCloud provisioning problem I cannot resolve, and Developer Support has not been able to help. My App ID: com.exaqservices.ArkyvTiles Symptoms: 1. In Xcode (v16.2), enabling iCloud in Signing & Capabilities repeatedly fails with: The app ID does not include the iCloud container. Click Try Again. Clicking Try Again does nothing. The error persists forever. 2. In Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles: • The iCloud capability is enabled for this App ID. • The CloudKit container is selected. • But the portal no longer shows the “iCloud Documents” checkbox, which used to be required for ubiquitous document support. 3. Xcode cannot regenerate provisioning profiles because it claims the App ID is missing the iCloud container — even though the container is attached. 4. Provisioning profiles on the Apple Developer site all appear expired, and new ones do not generate correctly. 5. The App Store Connect interface also does not show an iCloud Services section under App I
1
0
63
2w
Reply to Are read-only filesystems currently supported by FSKit?
I suppose a lot of my confusion lies in how FSBlockDeviceResource.blockSize is described as The logical block size, the size of data blocks used by the file system, which I understand to mean that in my case, I should be able to set it to the value stored in the superblock (let's say that's 4096). So, the more useful description is what's in the discussion: FSBlockDeviceResource.physicalBlockSize: This is equivalent to the DKIOCGETPHYSICALBLOCKSIZE device parameter. Conceptually, this means the smallest transfer the device is physically capable of transferring. In high-level API terms, all I/O done to the rdev (raw dev node) MUST be an even multiple of this value, otherwise the I/O will immediately fail without ever reaching the hardware driver. FSBlockDeviceResource.blockSize: This is equivalent to the DKIOCGETBLOCKSIZE device parameter. This value is the device’s preferred I/O size, meaning the size it would like to have even if it COULD handle smaller requests. Two points to understand here: Much of the ti
Topic: App & System Services SubTopic: Core OS Tags:
2w
App status stuck on “Waiting for Review” for 2+ days — any timeline guidance?
Hello everyone, I recently submitted my new app “Bitcoin Miner – Mining Pool” for App Review. The app was submitted under my Apple Developer account (Account Holder: Harshil Patel). However, the status has been “Waiting for Review” for over 2 days without any movement. Details: Submission platform: App Store Connect Metadata & screenshots uploaded correctly No compliance warnings or “Missing Information” alerts No previous rejections for this version I understand the review process time may vary, but I’m unsure whether this delay is normal or if there’s something more I should check on my side. Questions for the community / Apple Team Is there a typical timeline for apps currently showing “Waiting for Review”? My only goal is to ensure the submission process is moving correctly. Any guidance or suggestions will be highly appreciated. Thank you! — Harshil Patel
3
0
175
2w
reference preinstalled certificate keypair from an MDM profile
For additional security we would like to avoid keeping generated certificates (their private keys) on our server after installing them on a device, but still be able to reference them in later installed configuration profiles via MDM. However, it seems that for a configuration profile's payload to use a certificate (e.g. VPN payload), the certificate payload must be present in the same profile. Are we missing anything, perhaps it's already possible somehow? Ideal workflow for us would be: our MDM server generates a certificate (private+public keys) for a given device our MDM server sends this certificate to the device as configuration profile and saves PayloadUUID of the certificate's payload our MDM server deletes the generated private key from its storage. At this point the private key is present only on the device. at some point in the future our MDM server sends a configuration profile that references the certificate from step 2 via the saved PayloadUUID (e.g. using key PayloadCertificateUUID in
1
0
932
2w
Multiple iOS App Store rejection due to revenue cat "purchase failure: there was a problem with the apple store"
My app has been rejected multiple times during the last few weeks because Apple reviewer is unable to complete the purchase on revenue cat paywall. They gave this error message: Guideline 2.1 - Performance - App Completeness We were still unable to purchase the subscription successfully. Review device details: Device type: iPad Air 11-inch (M2) OS version: iPadOS 26.1 Next Steps When validating receipts on your server, your server needs to be able to handle a production-signed app getting its receipts from Apple’s test environment. The recommended approach is for your production server to always validate receipts against the production App Store first. If validation fails with the error code Sandbox receipt used in production, you should validate against the test environment instead. Resources Note that in-app purchases do not need to have been previously approved to confirm they function correctly in review. Note that the Account Holder must accept the Paid Apps Agreement
1
0
164
2w
Testing Age Assurance in Sandbox Failed
According to Apple's documentation at https://developer.apple.com/documentation/storekit/testing-age-assurance-in-sandbox?language=objc, the testing steps and expected responses are outlined as follows: Test app consent revocation To test the notification when a parent or guardian revokes access to your app on behalf of their child, follow these steps: Start with a Sandbox account. From the Age Assurance settings, tap Revoke App Consent. Enter your app’s Bundle ID (for example, com.example.bundle). Tap Revoke Consent to simulate the revocation. Confirm that the system displays “Notification Triggered” with the message “A notification will be sent to the developer server soon.” I followed the steps exactly as described above, but during the fifth step, instead of seeing the prompt A notification will be sent to the developer server soon, a pop-up dialog with only a confirmation button appeared. After clicking it, there was no further response, and our server did not receive any notification (neither from the S
2
0
156
2w
When does AVPlayer exclude _HLS_part query param in LL-HLS requests?
Hello, I'm investigating an issue with LL-HLS playback using AVPlayer, specifically during DVR Live seeking (seeking to a past time). I noticed that in certain seeking scenarios, AVPlayer sends a Blocking Playlist Reload request that includes the _HLS_msn parameter but is missing the _HLS_part parameter. While I understand this is compliant with the HLS spec, I would like to know the specific criteria AVPlayer uses to decide when to drop the _HLS_part parameter. Does AVPlayer intentionally omit the part info when it determines that loading a specific partial segment is unnecessary during a seek operation? Clarification on this behavior would help us greatly in debugging our stream delivery. Thanks in advance.
1
0
101
2w
Reply to sshd-keygen-wrapper permissions problem
[quote='867728022, shara7, /thread/806187?answerId=867728022#867728022, /profile/shara7'] I assume this is simply a bug [/quote] That’s correct. If you’re building a macOS product and this is causing you significant amounts of grief, it might make sense to ship an update to your product that embeds your program in an app-like wrapper (per Kevin’s suggestion above). Otherwise, my advice is that you wait for a fix. And, no, I don’t have any info to share as to when that fix will actually land. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
Topic: Privacy & Security SubTopic: General Tags:
2w
Reply to Seeking Official Channel for Third-Party Utility API Integration Proposal
While it’s possible that someone else might chime in, this is kinda off topic for the Apple Developer Forums. Our focus is on helping developers use Apple APIs, tools, and services to create products for Apple’s platforms. We’re not set up to help with requests like this. Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
2w
Reply to Running headless app as root for handling VPN and launching microservices
Does your product include a Network Extension provider that implements a custom VPN protocol? Or are you configuring the built-in VPN protocols using the Personal VPN API? And if you do have an NE provider, is it packaged as an appex or a sysex? Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
2w
Notarization status always stuck on "In Progress..."
Today, I used xcrun notarytool submit to upload my packaged Electron app for macOS—once as a .zip file and once as a .dmg—for Apple notarization. However, both submissions have been stuck at Current status: In Progress for several hours now. I’ve also checked the status using xcrun notarytool info, and it keeps returning status: In Progress. Could someone please help me understand what might be going wrong? This is quite urgent—if a technical support engineer or anyone from the team could take a look, I’d be glad to provide the UUIDs of my notarization requests.
3
0
537
2w
Reply to Thoughts while looking into upgrading from SCNetworkReachabilityGetFlags to NWPathMonitor
[quote='808401021, Mathias_, /thread/808401, /profile/Mathias_'] The advantage here with SCNetworkReachabilityGetFlags … would be that it's synchronous? [/quote] Yes and no. The API itself is synchronous, but it can block the calling thread waiting for the resolution to complete. That’s not exactly ideal. Coming back to your top-level issue, you wrote: [quote='867556022, Mathias_, /thread/808401?answerId=867556022#867556022, /profile/Mathias_'] For our geofence triggers for example [/quote] I think I’m missing something here. If you make the request without waiting for connectivity, it’ll fail promptly in most cases when the network is down. Do you need the network state to preflight the request? Or only to generate a better user-facing message if it’s already failed? Share and Enjoy — Quinn “The Eskimo!” @ Developer Technical Support @ Apple let myEmail = eskimo + 1 + @ + apple.com
2w