In iOS 26, with the introduction of the new prominent style buttons like system done, how to apply the tint color for these buttons in globally at app level.
We are only able to set for individual buttons using barButtonItem.tintColor and need a way to apply globally.
We’ve tried:
UIBarButtonItem.appearance().tintColor
UIBarButtonItem.appearance(whenContainedInInstancesOf: [UINavigationController.self]).tintColor
but nothing worked.
sample code:
let doneButton = UIBarButtonItem(barButtonSystemItem: .done, target: nil, action: nil)
doneButton.tintColor = .systemPink
Is there a new recommended way to globally style UIBarButtonItem with the prominent style in iOS 26?
Overview
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
In the video ”Create Icons with Icon Composer”, the presenter mentions that Apple has created a layer-to-SVG script for Illustrator that‘s available for download:
Once the artwork is in a good place, next we want to export the layers as SVGs. For every tool, this can look a bit different. For those using Illustrator, we've created a layer to SVG script that will automate this for you, which you can download. Exporting out the canvas size ensures everything drops right into position in Icon Composer.
Here‘s the link to the mention:
https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2025/361/?time=377
I can’t find any place to get this script, and my designer is very interested in using it to import our Illustrator icon into Icon Composer.
Can someone point me to it?
I've been trying to update my apps for iOS 26, and all summer I kept hitting this issue with the navigation bar title. I was hoping Apple would eventually fix it, but it still seems to be broken in beta 9, so now I'm wondering if I'm doing something wrong.
Here's a minimal working example:
struct ContentView: View {
@State private var path = NavigationPath()
var body: some View {
NavigationStack(path: $path) {
List {
Text("Item 1")
Text("Item 2")
Text("Item 3")
}
.navigationTitle("Title")
.toolbarBackground(Color(red: 0.5, green: 0.5, blue: 0.5), for: .navigationBar)
.toolbarBackgroundVisibility(.visible, for: .navigationBar)
}
}
}
Expected result: The title should be rendered on a gray background.
Actual result: The title is invisible because it is rendered below the gray background.
If I modify the gray color with .opacity(0.5), then it becomes clear that the title is indeed present, but it's behind the background.
This example works correctly in iOS 18.
Is this an iOS 26 bug or is this a forbidden design now because everything has to be translucent?
Topic:
UI Frameworks
SubTopic:
SwiftUI
Just posted this feedback regarding macOS 26 "Tahoe" (FB19853155) - please support with additional submissions if you share my view. I will miss the beautiful and individual designed icons of the past!
"macOS 26 is enforcing squicles for app icons, falling back to a grey background for 3rd party apps without a compliant AppIcon asset.
As a result many original app icons are reduced in size and hard to distinguish because they share the same background color. Although I respect Apple's strive for an iOS-like UI on Macs, a smooth transition path would be more user- and developer-friendly ... e.g. with some info.plist property to opt-out icon migration, potentially ignored by a future macOS version.
The current solution causes a bad usability, and makes the system look inconsistent as many - especially free - software will not be updated with new icon designs. Please reconsider this bad design decision!"
Hello,
I’m experiencing an issue in the Apple Developer portal when trying to manage my App ID capabilities. Whenever I try to enable or disable a capability and click Save, the page shows the loading spinner but then nothing is saved.
App ID: com.kangarli.lucary
Team ID: (my Apple Developer account’s Team ID)
Tested on different browsers (Safari, Chrome), cleared cache and cookies
The issue affects all capabilities, not just Associated Domains
Other sections of the Developer portal work normally
Is this a known issue with the Developer portal, or is there any workaround?
Thanks in advance.
When trying to deploy my app to App Store Connect from FlutterFlow, I keep receving this error message: This request is forbidden for security reasons - Unable to find a team with the given Content Provider ID '********' to which you belong. Please contact Apple Developer Program Support. https://developer.apple.com/support .
Topic:
App Store Distribution & Marketing
SubTopic:
App Store Connect API
I just made a small test app that uses SwiftData with CloudKit capability. I created a simple Book model as seen below. It looks like enums and structs when used with CloudKit capability all trigger this error:
'NSKeyedUnarchiveFromData' should not be used to for un-archiving and will be removed in a future release
I fixed the error by using genreRaw String and using a computed property to use it in the app, but it popped back up after adding the ReadingProgress struct
Should I ignore the error and assume Apple still supports enums and codable structs when using SwiftData with CloudKit?
import SwiftData
@Model
class Book {
var title: String = ""
var author: String = ""
var genreRaw: String = Genre.fantasy.rawValue
var review: String = ""
var rating: Int = 3
var progress: ReadingProgress?
var genre: Genre {
get { Genre(rawValue: genreRaw) ?? Genre.fantasy }
set { genreRaw = newValue.rawValue }
}
init(title: String, author: String, genre: Genre, review: String, rating: Int, progress: ReadingProgress? = nil) {
self.title = title
self.author = author
self.genre = genre
self.review = review
self.rating = rating
self.progress = progress
}
}
struct ReadingProgress: Codable {
var currentPage: Int
var totalPages: Int
var isFinished: Bool
var percentComplete: Double {
guard totalPages > 0 else { return 0 }
return Double(currentPage) / Double(totalPages) * 100
}
}
enum Genre: String, Codable, CaseIterable {
case fantasy
case scienceFiction
case mystery
case romance
var displayName: String {
switch self {
case .fantasy:
return "Fantasy"
case .scienceFiction:
return "Science Fiction"
case .mystery:
return "Mystery"
case .romance:
return "Romance"
}
}
}
We are currently working on a SCEP server implementation that operates in FIPS-approved mode. In this mode, RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 encryption is disallowed due to compliance requirements, and only FIPS-approved padding schemes such as RSA-OAEP are permitted.
However, we have observed that the SCEP client functionality on Apple devices currently does not support RSA-OAEP for CMS EnvelopedData decryption. This creates a challenge for us in ensuring FIPS compliance while maintaining compatibility with Apple devices during certificate enrollment through SCEP.
We would appreciate your guidance on the following:
Are there any alternative FIPS-approved encryption algorithms or configurations supported by Apple devices for SCEP CMS EnvelopedData decryption?
Is there any plan or timeline for future support of RSA-OAEP on Apple platforms for this use case?
Feedback raised along with sysdiagnose logs as well : FB17655410
Unsupported Request
PATCH to http://developer.apple.com/services-account/v1/bundleIds/{MyId} not supported.
Reference #8.5dfb1302.1756215327.6d0203bb
https://errors.edgesuite.net/8.5dfb1302.1756215327.6d0203bb
Topic:
Developer Tools & Services
SubTopic:
Apple Developer Program
The "Cancel" button for VNDocumentCameraViewController is not displayed on iPadOS 26. This issue appears to be specific to iPad, as the button appears correctly on iPhone.
I'm creating Live Photos programmatically in my app using the Photos and AVFoundation frameworks. While the Live Photos work perfectly in the Photos app (long press shows motion), users cannot set them as motion wallpapers. The system shows "Motion not available" message.
Here's my approach for creating Live Photos:
// 1. Create video with required metadata
let writer = try AVAssetWriter(outputURL: videoURL, fileType: .mov)
let contentIdentifier = AVMutableMetadataItem()
contentIdentifier.identifier = .quickTimeMetadataContentIdentifier
contentIdentifier.value = assetIdentifier as NSString
writer.metadata = [contentIdentifier]
// Video settings: 882x1920, H.264, 30fps, 2 seconds
// Added still-image-time metadata at middle frame
// 2. Create HEIC image with asset identifier
var makerAppleDict: [String: Any] = [:]
makerAppleDict["17"] = assetIdentifier // Required key for Live Photo
metadata[kCGImagePropertyMakerAppleDictionary as String] = makerAppleDict
// 3. Generate Live Photo
PHLivePhoto.request(
withResourceFileURLs: [photoURL, videoURL],
placeholderImage: nil,
targetSize: .zero,
contentMode: .aspectFit
) { livePhoto, info in
// Success - Live Photo created
}
// 4. Save to Photos library
PHAssetCreationRequest.forAsset().addResource(with: .photo, fileURL: photoURL, options: nil)
PHAssetCreationRequest.forAsset().addResource(with: .pairedVideo, fileURL: videoURL, options: nil)
What I've Tried
Matching exact video specifications from Camera app (882x1920, H.264, 30fps)
Adding all documented metadata (content identifier, still-image-time)
Testing various video durations (1.5s, 2s, 3s)
Different image formats (HEIC, JPEG)
Comparing with exiftool against working Live Photos
Expected Behavior
Live Photos created programmatically should be eligible for motion wallpapers, just like those from the Camera app.
Actual Behavior
System shows "Motion not available" and only allows setting as static wallpaper.
Any insights or workarounds would be greatly appreciated. This is affecting our users who want to use their created content as wallpapers.
Questions
Are there additional undocumented requirements for Live Photos to be wallpaper-eligible?
Is this a deliberate restriction for third-party apps, or a bug?
Has anyone successfully created Live Photos that work as motion wallpapers?
Environment
iOS 17.0 - 18.1
Xcode 16.0
Tested on iPhone 16 Pro
Topic:
Media Technologies
SubTopic:
Photos & Camera
Tags:
LivePhotosKit JS
PhotoKit
Core Image
AVFoundation
On earlier iOS versions Live Activity displays correctly according to mode set.
Can't find an opened issue for that
version: iOS 26
device: iPhone 16
NavigationLinks do not display correctly in tvOS 26. When using a Button, the correct behavior of vertically placing an Image or AsyncImage above one or two Text fields occurs. However, when using NavigationLink the image and text(s) are laid out horizontally. Attempting to fix this using a VStack prevents the text from sliding down as the NavigationLink receives focus. Using the hoverEffect modifier does not help.
Using a Button (correct behavior):
Using a NavigationLink without VStack:
Using a NavigationLink with VStack:
How to set speed > 2.0 for HLS video with AVPlayer?
I’m having an issue where the video has no sound when I change the speed to 2.1x or higher
Topic:
Community
SubTopic:
Apple Developers
Hey!
I am developing a macOS application with the help of an external vendor, who is supplying me with a closed-source XCFramework.
In Xcode, when I import their XCFramework bundle, when running the app, or opening a SwiftUI preview, or interacting with the app in any form, I get the familiar dialog:
"[SDK name].framework" Not Opened - Apple could not verify "[SDK name].framework" is free from malware that may harm your Mac or compromise privacy.
(Regardless, the application can run on my machine.)
But indeed, their cross-platform iOS/macOS XCFramework is not notarized at all (using spctl -a -t install), plus the macOS binary embedded is not code signed correctly (using codesign -d). The XCFramework itself is production code signed with a Developer ID certificate, however I believed the above issues to be valid.
Now, I asked the vendor to provide a correctly distributed (so code signed and notarized) framework, however they pointed out that "when I embed and sign the product in my app, it will be re-signed anyways". I understand this is true, but I believe this to be an important security boundary. If I were to re-sign under my name a closed source binary - previously unchecked for malware by Apple Notary Service -, I would put myself up for embedding potentially malicious code in my app, which could only be traced back to me - which would in turn mean a security issue would hinder my reputation here.
Am I being over-protective here, or is this a valid concern? I have no way to see the source code, so I strongly believe this XCFramework should be notarized correctly. I understand that an in-house XCFramework is fine unnotarized, given that I know its origin, but this seems like a unique case where notarization should be enforced from my side on the vendor.
Hello,
we are experiencing issues with adding VISA cards via In-App Provisioning on iOS using PassKit. The same flow works correctly with Mastercard, but for VISA cards the Apple broker endpoint returns HTTP 500.
Details
Device: iPhone15,3 (iPhone 15 Pro), iOS 18.6.1 (22G90)
Region: CZ
App: [REDACTED] (version 0.4.3)
Issuer ID: [REDACTED]
Merchant ID and entitlements are configured and validated.
SEID: [REDACTED]
Request flow
GET /broker/v4/devices/{SEID}/issuerProvisioningCertificates?encryptionVersion=EV_ECC_v2
Request ID: B61363A8-0BFF-4CD6-92BC-52C461DFFAAD
Response: 200 OK
Conversation ID: e12c64c9a0b54981adfad8d00800d836
Returned nonce: [REDACTED]
Timestamp: 2025.08.21_14-01-46+0200
POST /broker/v4/devices/{SEID}/cards
Request ID: F29B73CA-CDDE-4C0C-9F40-B87AE006FDDD
Payload fields present (values redacted): encryptedCardData [REDACTED], ephemeralPublicKey [REDACTED], publicKeyHash [REDACTED], nonce [REDACTED], issuerIdentifier [REDACTED], encryptionVersion=EV_ECC_v2
Response: 500 Internal Server Error (latency ~0.41s)
Timestamp: 2025.08.21_14-01-47+0200
Observation
Provisioning succeeds with Mastercard but consistently fails with VISA.
The GET issuerProvisioningCertificates succeeds; the POST …/cards returns 500.
Request
Could you please:
Provide internal error details for Request ID F29B73CA-CDDE-4C0C-9F40-B87AE006FDDD (and/or Conversation ID e12c64c9a0b54981adfad8d00800d836),
Confirm whether the 500 originates before or after the broker’s call to VTS (Visa Token Service), and
Validate that our app/merchant/issuer configuration is fully enabled for VISA push provisioning in our region.
Attached privately: sysdiagnose with full traces (can share via secure channel upon request).
Kind regards,
Martin
Environment
iOS 26.0 (device), Xcode 26 beta 7
SwiftUI TabView using the new Tab("…", value:) API
iPhone only (aware that minimize is iPhone-only)
Issue
.tabBarMinimizeBehavior(.onScrollDown) only works reliably in my Settings tab.
In my other tabs (Dashboard / Games / Help), the tab bar does not minimize when scrolling, even though the content is scrollable.
The main difference: those tabs are wrapped in a NavigationStack(path:) with a bound NavigationPath. Settings has no path binding.
Repro (minimal)
import SwiftUI
enum TabSel: Hashable { case dashboard, games, settings }
struct Root: View {
@State private var selection: TabSel = .dashboard
// Per-tab paths
@State private var dashPath = NavigationPath()
@State private var gamesPath = NavigationPath()
var body: some View {
if #available(iOS 26, *) {
TabView(selection: $selection) {
// ❌ Does NOT minimize when scrolling
SwiftUI.Tab("Dashboard", systemImage: "square.grid.2x2.fill", value: .dashboard) {
NavigationStack(path: $dashPath) {
ScrollView {
// ...
}
}
}
// ❌ Same here
SwiftUI.Tab("Games", systemImage: "sportscourt.fill", value: .games) {
NavigationStack(path: $gamesPath) {
ScrollView {
// ...
}
}
}
// ✅ Minimizes as expected on scroll
SwiftUI.Tab("Settings", systemImage: "gear", value: .settings) {
// Note: also inside a NavigationStack, but no `path` binding
NavigationStack {
ScrollView {
// ...
}
}
}
}
.tabBarMinimizeBehavior(.onScrollDown)
}
}
}
What I tried
Removing nested stacks in child views → no change
Ensured no .tabViewStyle(.page) / PageTabViewStyle() anywhere
No toolbar(.hidden, for: .tabBar) on the tab roots
Confirmed the content is scrollable and tested on device
Expected
All tabs should minimize the tab bar on downward scroll.
Actual
Only the Settings tab (no path binding) minimizes; tabs with NavigationStack(path:) do not.
Questions
Is this a known issue with NavigationStack(path:) and .tabBarMinimizeBehavior in iOS 26 betas?
Any recommended workaround that keeps a bound NavigationPath per tab?
I am trying to upload an App Preview to App Store Connect for a iphone app,I created the preview as an "App Preview".
When I try to upload the app preview I get the message " your app preview is too big".
The preview is 30 sec. It is 6 MB in size. MP4 format.
Who know how to change my app preview
Apple recently announced DL-TDoA (Downlink TDoA) support on iOS 26, and the API is currently marked Beta. Using two iPhones (16 Pro and 13) on iOS 26.0 Beta, I’m starting a Nearby Interaction session and need to read NITLDOA parameters (address, carrier frequency offset, signal strength/RSSI), but I can’t find a supported way. I’m also seeing asymmetry: iPhone 13 reports distance+direction, while 16 Pro reports distance only. Is there a supported workflow/API to access those parameters, and any known device/OS constraints that would cause direction to be unavailable on 16 Pro?
Hello,
My company has an in-store app with FPS SDK 4.x (1024) keys. We've handed those keys over to a trusted third-party and we do not have them. We've been in-store for several years.
The person that created the keys in our organization mistakenly stored them encrypted to our third-party's PGP keys, so we cannot decrypt them, and the third party also has no mechanism to provide us with the keys even though it is in their runtime environment. They only have secure mechanisms for us to upload keys onto their servers.
We are trying to migrate to a different third-party DRM provider, and would like to obtain new keys. Unfortunately, the developer portal won't let me create new keys, saying that we have exceeded the number of keys allowed, which I assume is one.
Additionally, the new DRM provider can only support SDK 4.x keys, and it appears that we can only request SDK 5.x keys on the Apple Developer portal, as the SDK 4.0 option is grayed out. Regardless, it seems that we are not able to request any keys.
We've submitted a request to the support e-mail address and received an automated e-mail that the response should take a few days, but may take longer on occasion. It's now been a month. The e-mail says that the reply address is not monitored. Is there any way we can accelerate this?
Thank you,
Carlos