Overview

When importing FoundationModels in watchOS 27 Beta 2 this error appears: /Applications/Xcode-beta.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/WatchOS.platform/Developer/SDKs/WatchOS27.0.sdk/System/Library/Frameworks/FoundationModels.framework/Modules/FoundationModels.swiftmodule/arm64e-apple-watchos.swiftinterface:6:15 Unable to resolve module dependency: 'CoreImage' Does anybody else have this issue?

I have an iPad app which is trying to support document renaming in the title bar. For IOS 17+ I set the renameDelegate to the document instance and it works fine. For IOS 16 I need to create an actual delegate, but no matter how I structure the code it fails with a permission error: Rename failed: “original_file_name” couldn’t be moved because you don’t have permission to access “Desktop”. It seems to always happen accessing the parent directory. I have tried using the file coordinator as well with the same result. It seems impossible to implement unless the callback contains a security permissioned url for the parent directory. Is there anyway to make this work in IOS 16 in the sandbox? Do I have to create my own rename functionality using a FilePicker? Seems like this should be built in like it is in MacOS, or even IOS17+ Here is the code: extension DocumentWindow : UINavigationItemRenameDelegate { func navigationItem(_ navigationItem: UINavigationItem, didEndRenamingWith title: String) { guard let doc = document else { return } let oldURL = doc.fileURL let newURL = oldURL.deletingLastPathComponent() .appendingPathComponent(title) .appendingPathExtension(oldURL.pathExtension) if newURL == oldURL { return } let access = oldURL.startAccessingSecurityScopedResource() defer { if access { oldURL.stopAccessingSecurityScopedResource() }} do { try FileManager.default.moveItem(at: oldURL, to: newURL) } catch { print("Rename failed: \(error.localizedDescription)") } // // // 1. Jump to a background queue to avoid the deadlock // DispatchQueue.global(qos: .userInitiated).async { // let coordinator = NSFileCoordinator(filePresenter: doc) // var error: NSError? // // // coordinator.coordinate(writingItemAt: oldURL, error: &error) { outOld in // do { // // 2. Perform the actual rename // try FileManager.default.moveItem(at: outOLD, to: newURL) // } catch { // print("Rename failed: \(error.localizedDescription)") // } // } // // if let error = error { // print("Coordination error: \(error.localizedDescription)") // } // } } // 2. Optional: Validation (e.g., prevent empty names) func navigationItem(_ navigationItem: UINavigationItem, shouldEndRenamingWith title: String) -> Bool { return !title.trimmingCharacters(in: .whitespacesAndNewlines).isEmpty } }

Hello, To support adaptive layouts on iOS27 I want to display the sidebar on landscape iPhone app windows. (Like in the old days of the iPhone 6 Plus... >.>) It appears that TabView ignores attempts to force it into sidebar mode even in the "Resize mode" of the device manager. Am I holding it wrong? Is this a bug? Apple is not clear about how their components should be behaving to support adaptive layouts, and if rumors are true, it will be important come this fall.

We've got our first app developed currently stuck in a loop with AppStore Review. And we are getting no where. After no shows from calls with the team someone finally got back to me but after they had the team really try we have made no progress. We have subscriptions to use the app and then a further subscription to turn on a local web server. We have been able to purchase both (in each of their modes, monthly,annually, annually-monthly, outright) via test flight THOUSANDS of times. App Store Review have never been able to see the purchases. They keep sending general 'you need to turn on StoreKit' 'you need to configure AppStore API' But I dont think that we do? Its very strange that we can ue the IAP's perfectly but when we submit they cannot be seen. We keep going through this cycle: Create IAPS. set them up in our app Test them locally (using sandbox from Xcode) Deploy via test flight to other machines. Do in app purchases absolutely no problem. Submit binary+add IAPS (this sets them into awaiting or pending review) Get rejected due to IAP's not being configured. We get pointed to the same resource over and over and they say 'configure StoreKit' Well how can store kit not be configured and in app purchases work in the TestFlight sandbox? We see many reports on places saying 'I submit my app and they cant review it I create the same again and the 5th time it works' I spoke on the phone with someone from apple who said she had the engineers try multiple times and they just get the attached image saying 'currently unavailable', weve never seen this, we cant reproduce it and it doesnt seem to be anything we have control over. I guess the question is what is the difference between the 'sandbox' we use and the sandbox reviewers use? I cant see anything about any differences and we have no idea what we possible could have missed.

Hi all: We use MDM profile to apply Full Disk Access permission for app on macOS, After profile deployed successfully, The App can get correct Full Disk Access permission, However, on "Privacy & Security" UI, we found that our app shown disabled, see as however, on some macOS, it showed correctly as below The issue happened on different os version. macOS 15 and macOS 26 When the item shown as disable, even reboot computer several times, the issue still persist. Thanks for your help

I’ve been trying to enroll in the Apple Developer Program for days, but I immediately receive the error: “Your enrollment could not be completed.” This happens on the web, on my Mac, and in the Apple Developer app. I cannot proceed to any step, as the error appears before entering any information or payment details. In the app, the “Enroll Now” button is also disabled.

Anyone else seeing this? I reported the regression back in March 2025 and have no reply from Apple. My apps are Obj-C, in case it matters. DESCRIPTION After updating to iOS 18.3.x, | noticed a regression in the title menu behavior of my UlDocumentViewController-based shipping apps on the App Store [1]: Instead of displaying the document icon supplied by the app, the share menu item displays a placeholder icon instead, and iconservicesagent error messages are emitted in the log stream [2]. STEPS TO REPRODUCE Install one of the apps from note [1] below. Launch the app, tap the document/title menu at top center of the screen, and observe first menu item. RESULTS Expected: App-provided document icon displayed to left of first menu item ("W-1" or "W68" document icon). Actual: Placeholder icon displayed. REGRESSION Occurs: iOS 18.3 (iPad) iOS 18.3.1 (iPhone) iOS 18.3.2 (iPhone) Does Not Occur: iOS 18.2,18.3 Simulator iOS 18.0-18.2? [| no longer have a device with < 18.3 to confirm regression point] NOTES: [1] WOZNIAC-1 <https://apps.apple.com/us/ app/wozniac-1/id6474085354> and WOZNIAC-68 <https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ wozniac-68/id6736677781>. [2] When the problem occurs, the following log messages are omitted: Error returned from iconservicesagent image request: <|STagIcon: 0x30299c040> Tag: alvm, Class: public.filename-extension, Base type: public.item - <|SImageDescriptor: Ox300dd5860> - (37.00, 48.00)@3x v:40000 1:5 a: 0:0:0:0 t:() b:0 s:2 ps:0 digest: 0D3223D0-9AЕ3-3B19-A081-ACACE55691B7 error: Error Domain=NSOSStatusErrorDomain Code=-609 "Client is disallowed from making such an icon request" UserInfo={NSLocalizedDescription=Client is disallowed from making such an icon request}

Im unable to deploy Xcode 27 beta code to an iPhone 17 pro The build is successful but its not loading

Hello, What are the restrictions on submitting apps to the mac App Store that use an NETransparentProxy alongside a locally installed and trusted Root-CA to intercept, decrypt and manipulate TLS traffic? To be more specific, I'm not talking about a Safari extension. I'm talking about system-wide traffic. So that the app can detect and block ads and trackers from all apps, not just Safari. I'm aware that such an app can be distributed using an unsandboxed Developer-ID signed app. But I wonder if such an app also breaks Sandbox requirements for AppStore distributed apps? Also, is there a way for a sandboxed app to install and trust a root CA? SecTrustSettingsSetTrustSettings does not work in Sandboxed apps from what I found. Finally, I want to ask about EndpointSecurity. Can this entitlement be used in AppStore-ditributed apps? Is doing any of these things possible on AppStore-distributed apps? Thanks in advance for your reply.

I saw there is a new es_new_descendants_client() function in Endpoint Security, with very interesting details: no TCC approval required no root privileges required which makes it very different from how we've known Endpoint Security so far. What is the real life use of this client? First, I thought it would be good to monitor processes I launch from my central application - but I won't fork() or exec() other apps - I will ask launchd to open them (NSWorkspace...), so they won't be descendants of my Endpoint Security client containing process. Not to mention, I don't understand how this aligns with the entitlement being attachable only to system(?) extensions. Or, can I now add this entitlement to an application? The dropping of root privilege as a requirement seems like this entitlement could be attached to regular apps. Or it can only be attached to a launchd agent, rather than a daemon? I haven't seen any pointers in Endpoint Security documentation other than this function's documentation. A tutorial would be very nice to have. Thanks in advance!

My app has been stuck in "waiting for review" for over 2 days now. The previous time it was stuck for a few weeks until I posted here for someone to review it. Can somebody please take a look at my app and review it.

Currently in the Apple Developer Forums RSS feeds the content of many of the posts is truncated. It would be nice if the RSS feed contained the full content of the post. FB23382531 https://github.com/feedback-assistant/reports/issues/808

I've hit a dead end with normal Apple support channels. I wrote up a radar for it (FB23333685). I used curl -v https://developer.apple.com/forums/ on my Mac via my phone's hotspot (working) and via Spectrum (not working) (some irrelevant stuff elided to shrink post): Working: % curl -v https://developer.apple.com/forums/ * Host developer.apple.com:443 was resolved. * IPv6: 2620:149:a06:f000::134, 2620:149:a06:f000::139 * IPv4: 17.253.31.140, 17.253.31.139 * Trying [2620:149:a06:f000::134]:443... * Connected to developer.apple.com (2620:149:a06:f000::134) port 443 <elided> > GET /forums/ HTTP/1.1 > Host: developer.apple.com > User-Agent: curl/8.7.1 > Accept: */* > * Request completely sent off < HTTP/1.1 200 OK < Server: Apple < Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 23:22:30 GMT < Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8 < Vary: Accept-Encoding < Set-Cookie: oid-dev-forums=; Path=/; Domain=.apple.com; Expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT; Max-Age=0; Secure; HttpOnly < Expires: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 23:22:29 GMT < X-Frame-Options: DENY < Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains < Service-Worker-Allowed: / < User-Type: anonymous < Cache-Control: private,no-cache,no-store, must-revalidate, max-age=0 < Last-Modified: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 23:22:29 GMT < X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff < Content-Security-Policy: <elided> < Vary: Accept-Encoding < X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block < Vary: Origin < Vary: Access-Control-Request-Method < Vary: Access-Control-Request-Headers < Content-Language: en-US < X-Request-ID: 41b2b91a2a2c5e8be35787ec7b349db8 < Edge-Control: !no-store,max-age=3600 < X-Request-ID: 41b2b91a2a2c5e8be35787ec7b349db8 < Set-Cookie: myacinfo=; Path=/; Domain=.apple.com; Expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT; Max-Age=0; Secure; HttpOnly < Set-Cookie: asc_user=; Path=/; Domain=.apple.com; Expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT; Max-Age=0; Secure < Set-Cookie: XID=<redacted>; Path=/; Domain=.apple.com; Expires=Wed, 22 Jul 2026 23:22:29 GMT; Max-Age=2592000; Secure; HttpOnly < Set-Cookie: df_shld_btm_prd=<redacted>; Expires=Tue, 23 Jun 2026 11:22:30 GMT; Max-Age=43200; Domain=apple.com; Path=/; SameSite=Lax; Secure < Age: 2 < Via: https/1.1 ussea4-edge-mx-005.ts.apple.com (acdn/302.16436), https/1.1 ussea4-edge-fx-007.ts.apple.com (acdn/302.16436) < X-Cache: miss, miss < CDNUUID: 42f00814-9cfb-4675-a0fa-4f3aa5ba89da-2134634100 < Transfer-Encoding: chunked < Connection: keep-alive < <!DOCTYPE html> … Failing: % curl -v https://developer.apple.com/forums/ * Host developer.apple.com:443 was resolved. * IPv6: (none) * IPv4: 17.253.83.137, 17.253.83.132 * Trying 17.253.83.137:443... * Connected to developer.apple.com (17.253.83.137) port 443 <redacted> * SSL certificate verify ok. * using HTTP/1.x > GET /forums/ HTTP/1.1 > Host: developer.apple.com > User-Agent: curl/8.7.1 > Accept: */* > * Request completely sent off < HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden < Server: Apple < Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 23:16:25 GMT < Content-Type: text/html < Content-Length: 146 < Cache-Control: private, no-cache, no-store, max-age=0 < Age: 0 < Via: https/1.1 uslax1-edge-mx-005.ts.apple.com (acdn/302.16436), https/1.1 uslax1-edge-fx-015.ts.apple.com (acdn/302.16436) < X-Cache: miss, miss < CDNUUID: 4da2a4a9-3bd4-4135-b895-6b58b6d7f53b-1614544808 < Connection: keep-alive < <html> <head><title>403 Forbidden</title></head> <body> <center><h1>403 Forbidden</h1></center> <hr><center>Apple</center> </body> </html> * Connection #0 to host developer.apple.com left intact The Spectrum response never reached the forums app at all — it was rejected at the edge node itself (uslax1-edge-mx-005 / uslax1-edge-fx-015, both LA-area). The working request happened to land on a Seattle-area edge (ussea4) via anycast routing. So this isn't an app-level or account-level block — it's a deny rule sitting on (or upstream of) the LA edge PoP for my specific IP. Thing is, I don’t know how to get help on this issue.

So I am adding Catalyst support to my iOS app. I went through and updated my code and Build Settings to add Catalyst support. I can build for any iOS build or macOS build. I went into App Store Connect and then added a macOS build. I am not able to do a single build and archive that uploads a build for both macOS and iOS. I can do a build and archive for "Any iOS Device (arm64)" and it shows up in the iOS test flight. I can do a build and archive for "Any Mac (Mac Catalyst, arm64, x86_64) and it shows in the macOS test flight. Maybe I'm making a bad assumption ( I could not find any documentation on it) but I assumed Catalyst was a single build and archive that showed up in BOTH macOS and iOS sections. The build settings seem to imply the build is good for a single build and archive process. I want this to be a universal app and my assumption doing it that way would keep everything in sync when you push to the App Store. You can already download the app through the App Store but it is a version of the iPad app. I was hoping to make it more native and available in the Mac App Store without the iPhone/iPad app option. Am I making bad assumptions? Will I just have to do two Build and Archives for every build? I just want to make sure I'm doing this correctly and the best way.

Hi, I have two questions: Is there any way to test the revoke consent flow on a local build of our app? When I try using Sandbox to "Revoke App Consent" with the application bundle ID of a locally built and deployed app, it fails with "Cannot Trigger Notification. The bundle ID you provided is invalid or you do not have access to the app." https://developer.apple.com/support/age-assurance/#responsibility states that "When a parent or guardian revokes consent for their child to access an app, Apple will prevent the app from launching." However, when using the Sandbox to revoke app consent, the app is still launchable. Does anyone know if the app being launchable is exclusive to Sandbox, and how this works in prouduction?

Hello, Quick clarification regarding age ratings: If a user is 17 years old and wants to download a 16+ app, is parental approval required? Or is parental consent only needed if the app’s rating does not match (or exceeds) the user’s actual age? Also, is this fully enforced by Apple, or is it up to developers how to implement these checks? Thanks!

How do I select between GPT and Claude, and the model, when opening a new task for the coding agent with the ‘New Conversation’ button in the toolbar?

I've created a basic Multiplatform Project in Xcode, by going to File > New > Project. I've also included the default widget extension target. When I run the widget on Mac, and I control-click and choose "Edit Widget" the widget just kinda turns gray and floats over other windows, but does not let me configure anything. We leave the option to use configure with app intents turned on when adding the widget extension target. When I run the same project on an iPhone simulator, I can configure the widget without any issue. If someone else has a few minutes, can they see if this repeats for them? We are running this test because we are seeing the same experience in a real widget we are trying to develop but we can't get it to go into configuration mode on Mac.

Hello there, I am trying to clarify whether iOS 26 changed the expected Phone Recents behavior for CallKit calls reported with CXHandle.generic. On iOS 18 and earlier, CallKit calls reported with: CXHandle(type: .generic, value: <stable custom identifier>) were grouped and displayed in Phone Recents based on the stable handle value. The details/history screen for a Recents entry showed calls for that same handle value. On iOS 26, the same approach no longer appears to work the same way. Observed behavior on iOS 26 I tested multiple stable CXHandle.generic values. The Recents rows are created, but when opening the details/history screen for one Recents entry, the history shows all calls, not only calls for the selected generic handle value. I also tested other handle types: CXHandle(type: .emailAddress, value: <stable email-like identifier>) works as expected: Recents grouping and the details/history screen are isolated to that handle value. CXHandle(type: .phoneNumber, value: <phone number>) also works as expected for real phone-number-style identities: Recents grouping and the details/history screen are isolated to that phone number. CXHandle(type: .generic, value: <stable custom identifier>) does not work the same way on iOS 26: the details/history screen is not isolated to that generic handle value and instead shows all calls. Questions Is CXHandle.generic still intended to be a supported identity for Phone Recents grouping and the details/history screen on iOS 26? Given that .emailAddress and .phoneNumber handles appear to isolate history correctly, is .generic intentionally treated differently by the iOS 26 Phone app, or is this a regression? Did iOS 26 change Phone Recents/details matching so that CXHandle.generic values are no longer used as isolated per-caller identities? If this behavior is intentional, what handle type should be used for stable non-phone CallKit identities? Is using CXHandle(type: .emailAddress, value: "@example.invalid") an acceptable supported approach for stable non-phone identities, if the value is not a real user email address? Is there documentation describing the iOS 26 Phone Recents identity-matching behavior for CallKit calls? Minimal repro Configure a CXProvider with calls included in Recents. Report several CallKit calls using different stable generic handles, for example: CXHandle(type: .generic, value: "app-target-1") CXHandle(type: .generic, value: "app-target-2") End the calls. Open Phone Recents on iOS 26. Open the details/history screen for one of the Recents entries. Expected result: The details/history screen shows only calls for the selected generic handle value. Actual result: The details/history screen shows all calls. Could you clarify whether this is expected behavior on iOS 26, a regression, or an unsupported use of CXHandle.generic? Thank you.

I’ve been experimenting with Foundation Models and built a small Swift package that wraps LanguageModelSession with simple context management. The current approach checks the transcript token count using tokenCount(for:), compacts the transcript when it reaches a threshold, and retries once if exceededContextWindowSize is thrown. I’d appreciate feedback on whether this is a sensible use of Foundation Models APIs, especially around rebuilding a session from a compacted Transcript. GitHub: https://github.com/ricky-stone/FoundationContext