Overview

In our macOS solution, we have a few processes and a few plugin modules which communicate with each other over XPC. We have recently started enforcing library validation flag along with hardened runtime for all processes and plugins. To enforce that, we are trying to get signing information from the XPC audit token using SecCodeCopySigningInformation with kSecCSDynamicInformation flag. As per documentation, this flag requires a live SecCode not SecStaticCode to be passed to SecCodeCopySigningInformation. However, SecCodeCopySigningInformation explicitly requires SecStaticCode in its parameters. So I am unsure how to pass live SecCode to SecCodeCopySigningInformation without copying SecStaticCode from it using SecCodeCopyStaticCode. Force cast from SecCode to SecStaticCode fails. Is unsafeBitCast a valid option in this case? Note that we support macOS version 12 and later.

Hello, I am working on a network security and DLP (Data Loss Prevention) solution. A core requirement of our architecture is the ability to modify network traffic payloads in-flight (e.g., stripping sensitive data or altering packets). So, the only way to implement this is via the NETransparentProxyProvider which allows us to handle, evaluate, and modify network flows (NEAppProxyFlow). However, because this is such a powerful mechanism, my primary goal is to ensure the absolute stability of the operating system. I want to minimize the risk of interfering with core Apple services. When evaluating a flow, I have access to NEFlowMetaData, specifically properties like sourceAppUniqueIdentifier and sourceAppAuditToken. Could you please assist me with the following questions: Is there a recommended list of Apple system Application IDs (Bundle IDs) or executable names that should be strictly bypassed (ignored) by the Network Extension to maintain system integrity? Since system daemons can change between OS releases, are there any programmatic best practices or specific rules to dynamically identify core OS traffic that must not be intercepted? Are there any specific network ports or protocols that Apple strongly recommends excluding from NENetworkRule matches at the proxy provider configuration level to ensure daemons like apsd or mDNSResponder function correctly? Thank you in advance.

When running parallel Swift Testing tests that each create their own in-memory ModelContainer, the first xcodebuild test run succeeds but all subsequent runs fail with DefaultStore save failed validation errors — unless DerivedData is deleted between runs. Setup Each test suite creates an isolated in-memory container with a unique name: ModelConfiguration(UUID().uuidString, schema: schema, isStoredInMemoryOnly: true) The @Model class has non-optional properties (e.g. var v: String, var entityDicMoveNr: Int) that are always set in init. Symptoms on second run SwiftData.DefaultStore save failed with error: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=1560 "Multiple validation errors occurred." NSValidationErrorKey=v, NSValidationErrorValue=null NSValidationErrorKey=entityDicMoveNr, NSValidationErrorValue=null NSValidationErrorKey=historyBackup, NSValidationErrorValue=null The errors appear before test code executes — during SwiftData's internal DefaultStore auto-save. Properties that are always initialized in Swift show as nil in the Core Data layer. What we verified Each run uses a fresh xctest process (different PIDs) Container creation succeeds (no errors in our ModelContainer init) The @Model init always sets all fields — confirmed with debug prints Deleting DerivedData before each run fixes it (but forces a full rebuild) What didn't help Using ModelContext(container) instead of container.mainContext Setting autosaveEnabled = false on both mainContext and custom contexts Using /dev/null URL instead of isStoredInMemoryOnly: true build-for-testing + test-without-building Clearing only Logs/Test or TestResults subdirectories Why not run via swift test? We can't fall back to swift test because our project uses RealityKit custom components, which silently fail to decode in CLI swift test. So xcodebuild test is our only option, making the DerivedData workaround especially costly. Workaround Delete DerivedData before each xcodebuild test invocation. Environment macOS 15.5, Xcode 16.4, Swift Testing with @Suite @MainActor parallel test suites. Question Is there a way to fully isolate in-memory ModelContainer instances so that no metadata leaks between xcodebuild test runs without requiring a full DerivedData clean?

I have a few rejections with the same feedback: "Provide a demo video that shows: The current version of the app in use on a physical Apple device, not on a simulator The initial pairing process between the app and the designated hardware The entire app workflow with the designated hardware" I provided a demo link in the place asked and re-submitted but I keep on getting the same (automated?) response. Is there any guidance for unlocking this back and forth on the submission process? I'm guessing I can probably resubmit a rebuild but that doesn't seem to make sense since nothing has changed other than me adding the demo link later.

Hi, Our team already has the Family Controls (Distribution) entitlement approved for the main app and existing Screen Time extensions. We recently added a new Shield Configuration extension to show a custom on-device shield UI using ManagedSettingsUI. It is only used for UI rendering and does not collect or send any user data. However, the entitlement does not seem to be applied to this new extension yet, and we are blocked from proceeding with builds. We have already contacted support but haven’t received an update yet. Case ID: 102881099623 It’s been days without any update, and this has become really stressful for our team since we’re completely blocked at the final step after months of work on this app. Could someone please help to apply/sync the Family Controls distribution entitlement or guide us on the next steps? Happy to share app details privately if needed. Thanks.

I'm facing a persistent location error on real iOS device: Error Domain=kCLErrorDomain Code=1 The operation couldn’t be completed. (kCLErrorDomain error 1.)

Hello, I have followed the instructions in https://developer.apple.com/documentation/backgroundassets to setup background asset to work on the iPhone. I am able to confirm successfully test the asset packs locally on the iPhone. However, when I try to run the my test code on the Mac (Designed for iPad), I get this error. BackgroundAssets/AssetPackManager.swift:206: Fatal error: The app couldn’t be validated: The bundle’s info dictionary lacks a string value for the key “BAAppGroupID”. Is this feature not supported on the Mac?

Summary We are seeing a recurring fatal NSInternalInconsistencyException on iOS 26.x devices. The crash originates entirely from system frameworks (Foundation / WebKit / Screen Time / NSXPCConnection) — there are no app frames in the stack. The exception is raised from an XPC reply on a worker thread, so the host app cannot wrap it in @try/@catch. The crash appears to be a KVO consistency check failing inside the platform's internal Screen Time observer (STScreenTimeConfigurationObserver) when it observes WKWebView's configuration.enforcesChildRestrictions key path. The exception message states the value of the intermediate key configuration changed without an appropriate KVO notification. Environment iOS versions: 26.2.1 (also seen on 26.0.x – 26.2.x) Devices: iPhone 13 (iPhone14,5), iPhone 16 Plus, others App orientation: portrait Process state at crash: BACKGROUND (most occurrences) App uses WKWebView in several screens (link preview, in-app web, 3rd-party SDK web views) Crash is recurring across multiple users on iOS 26.x and is reproducible at scale in production Exception Name: NSInternalInconsistencyException Reason: Cannot update for observer <WKScreenTimeConfigurationObserver 0x...> for the key path "configuration.enforcesChildRestrictions" from <STScreenTimeConfigurationObserver 0x...>, most likely because the value for the key "configuration" has changed without an appropriate KVO notification being sent. Check the KVO-compliance of the STScreenTimeConfigurationObserver class. Crashing thread (top frames) 0 CoreFoundation __exceptionPreprocess 1 libobjc.A.dylib objc_exception_throw 2 Foundation -[NSKeyValueNestedProperty object:withObservance:didChangeValueForKeyOrKeys:recurse:forwardingValues:] 3 Foundation NSKeyValueDidChange 4 Foundation -[NSObject(NSKeyValueObservingPrivate) _changeValueForKeys:count:maybeOldValuesDict:maybeNewValuesDict:usingBlock:] 5 Foundation -[NSObject(NSKeyValueObservingPrivate) _changeValueForKey:key:key:usingBlock:] 6 Foundation NSSetObjectValueAndNotify 7 CoreFoundation invoking 8 Foundation -[NSInvocation invoke] 9 Foundation 10 Foundation -[NSXPCConnection _decodeAndInvokeReplyBlockWithEvent:sequence:replyInfo:] 11 Foundation __88-[NSXPCConnection _sendInvocation:orArguments:count:methodSignature:selector:withProxy:]_block_invoke_5 12 libxpc.dylib _xpc_connection_reply_callout 13 libxpc.dylib _xpc_connection_call_reply_async 14 libdispatch.dylib _dispatch_mach_msg_async_reply_invoke 15 libdispatch.dylib _dispatch_root_queue_drain_deferred_item 16 libdispatch.dylib _dispatch_kevent_worker_thread (Every frame above frame 0 lives in the system. No app frames are present.) What we observed Crash fires asynchronously on a libdispatch kevent worker thread, triggered by an XPC reply from the Screen Time service. The exception is thrown while the platform updates a chained KVO key path (configuration.enforcesChildRestrictions) on a WKWebView instance. The intermediate key configuration apparently changed without a paired willChange/didChange notification, which Foundation's KVO machinery then flags as inconsistency. Because the throw happens on the XPC reply path, there is no app-level synchronous frame we can wrap to recover. The exception unwinds straight into std::__terminate. What we tried (no effect) Confirmed all WKWebView creation and release happens on the main thread. Stop loading and nil out navigationDelegate before releasing the WKWebView. Avoided mutating WKWebViewConfiguration after the WKWebView is created. Checked for any custom KVO on WKWebView.configuration in app code — none exists. The crash still reproduces; we have no path to mitigate it from the application side. Questions for Apple / the community Is STScreenTimeConfigurationObserver expected to observe WKWebView.configuration.enforcesChildRestrictions under all conditions on iOS 26, or only when Screen Time / Communication Limits / Child Restrictions are enabled on the device? 2. Is there a public API (WKWebViewConfiguration option, Info.plist key, etc.) to opt a WKWebView out of Screen Time observation for hosts that do not need Screen Time integration for their web content? 3. Is this a known regression in iOS 26.x KVO chained-key-path notification posting inside WebKit's Screen Time integration? If so, is a fix slated for an upcoming 26.x release? 4. Is there any recommended workaround on the application side that does not rely on swizzling private Foundation / NSXPCConnection methods? Reproduction notes We do not have a deterministic local repro. Crashes are heavily concentrated on: iOS 26.2.1 Devices with Screen Time / Communication Limits / Child Restrictions configured at the OS level App entering the BACKGROUND state shortly after a WKWebView session If anyone has a reliable local repro on a developer device, please share — we would also like to file a Feedback Assistant report with steps. Filed Feedback Will attach FB number once filed. Thanks in advance.

Hello. Some users of my app experience crashes that mention PDFKit. I managed to find out what specific PDF file caused the crash and created a sample that demonstrates the issue and created a bug report in Feedback Assistant (FB22409977). Unfortunately I didn't get any answer for over a month, hence I'm writing it here so others can see that this is a known issue. The crash repro sample is very simple, it's just a PDFView that opens a bundled PDF file upon application lanunch. To cause the crash it is only needed to zoom-in and move around the page that has a table. The crash happens when the system tries to do some sort of OCR. The original crash report came from iPhone 11 user running iOS 26.3.1. Recently another user with iPhone 16 Pro Max running 26.5 experienced the same crash. Thread 12 Queue : PDFKWit.PDFDocument.formFillingQueue (serial) #0 0x000000018d320bd8 in PageLayout::GetBoundsForRangeWithinLine () #1 0x000000018d320c88 in PageLayout::GetBoundsForTextRange () #2 0x000000018d393028 in CGPDFTaggedNodeCreateCopyWithStringRange () #3 0x000000018d316630 in invocation function for block in TaggedParser::InsertLinkAnnotationsIntoStructureTree(CGPDFTaggedNode*, CGPDFPage*, PageLayout&) () #4 0x000000018d104f00 in CGPDFPageEnumerateAnnotations () #5 0x000000018d106968 in CGPDFPageCopyRootTaggedNode () #6 0x000000018d106710 in CGPDFPageInsertTableDescriptions () #7 0x00000001957a65b8 in +[PDFPageAnalyzerV2 addTablesFromVisionDocument:documentImage:toPage:withBox:] () #8 0x00000001957a3030 in +[PDFPageAnalyzerV2 analyzePage:withBox:requestTypes:] () #9 0x000000019584c018 in __31-[PDFView visiblePagesChanged:]_block_invoke () When CG_PDF_VERBOSE env variable is set, "New text range needs to be within the original node's text range." warning is printed to console several times before the crash happens.

I'm writing a read-only filesystem extension. I see that the documentation for loadResource(resource:options:replyHandler:) claims that the --rdonly option is supported, which suggests that this should be possible. However, I have never seen this option provided to my filesystem extension, even if I return usableButLimited as a probe result (where it doesn't mount at all - FB19241327) or pass the -r or -o rdonly options to the mount(8) command. Instead I see those options on the volume's activate call. But other than saving that "readonly" state (which, in my case, is always the case) and then throwing on all write-related calls I'm not sure how to actually mark the filesystem as "read-only." Without such an indicator, the user is still offered the option to do things like trash items in Finder (although of course those operations do not succeed since I throw an EROFS error in the relevant calls). It also seems like the FSKit extensions that come with the system handle read-only strangely as well. For example, for a FAT32 filesystem, if I mount it like mount -r -F -t msdos /dev/disk15s1 /tmp/mnt Then it acts... weirdly. For example, Finder doesn't know that the volume is read-only, and lets me do some operations like making new folders, although they never actually get written to disk. Writing may or may not lead to errors and/or the change just disappearing immediately (or later), which is pretty much what I'm seeing in my own filesystem extension. If I remove the -F option (thus using the kernel extension version of msdos), this doesn't happen. Are read-only filesystems currently supported by FSKit? The fact that extensions like Apple's own msdos also seem to act weirdly makes me think this is just a current FSKit limitation, although maybe I'm missing something. It's not necessarily a hard blocker given that I can prevent writes from happening in my FSKit module code (or, in my case, just not implement such features at all), but it does make for a strange experience. (I reported this as FB21068845, although I'm mostly asking here because I'm not 100% sure this is not just me missing something.)

Hi, My iOS app, "GNYS" (Apple ID 6761986315) was submitted on 14 April 2026 and has had the status, "Waiting for Review" since then - now for 24 days. This is a first submission. I previously contacted Apple Support but haven’t received a clear explanation or timeline. I’d really appreciate it if the App Review team could look into this or advise on whether any additional information is needed from my side. Thank you.

Dear Apple Developer Support, We are experiencing an issue where our properly signed, notarized, and stapled PKG installer is being blocked by Gatekeeper on macOS Sequoia (15.3), despite passing all notarization checks. Team ID: 3888L7DV3P Organization: SKY GATE TECHNOLOGYS K.K. Certificate: Developer ID Installer: SKY GATE TECHNOLOGYS K.K. (3888L7DV3P) Issue Details: Our PKG installer is signed with "Developer ID Installer" certificate, notarized (status: Accepted, issues: null), and stapled successfully. pkgutil --check-signature confirms: "signed by a developer certificate issued by Apple for distribution" and "Notarization: trusted by the Apple notary service" xcrun stapler validate confirms: "The validate action worked!" However, spctl --assess --type install returns "rejected" with assessment:verdict = false and assessment:remote = true The system log shows: meetsDeveloperIDLegacyAllowedPolicy = 0 When users download and open the PKG (even from within a notarized DMG), Gatekeeper displays: "Apple could not verify [app] is free of malware" Notably, our .app bundles signed with "Developer ID Application" (same Team ID) pass Gatekeeper without issues. Only PKG installers are affected. Our software is a legitimate enterprise security product (VPN/Zero Trust client) distributed to corporate customers. Could you please: Investigate why our Team ID's PKG installers are being rejected by Gatekeeper's online assessment despite valid notarization Advise on any steps we can take to resolve the meetsDeveloperIDLegacyAllowedPolicy = 0 status for our Team ID Confirm whether there is a trust establishment process for new Developer ID Installer certificates with the Gatekeeper service Thank you for your assistance. Best regards, Riku Ogura Skygate Technologies K.K.

My app has been stuck in Apple’s review process for over a week now, and I haven’t received any updates, feedback, or status changes. It’s frustrating to have no communication or transparency during the review process. Hoping for a response from the App Review team soon.

I started a fresh “Sticker Pack App” project, add one image to it and it wouldn’t show up on emulator or device. From what I remember, there shouldn't be any coding involved, just drag and drop images of the correct format and dimensions and it should work. I tried changing the file format, dimensions etc while consulting with web and AI assistant searches and but still didn’t work. Apple support also didn't reply with anything useful but to post in the forum. I'm guessing I'm missing something trivial where a lot of us here have encountered before. Appreciate your help here, thank you in advance!

Hi everyone, I submitted my app ZEROCAUGE PRO on April 21st. It has been 16 days and the status is still "Waiting for Review." I have: Sent multiple messages via the Resolution Center (no response) Requested an Expedited Review Tried the Developer Support callback — technical error every time This is impacting real users and a live business. Paying coaches and athletes are waiting daily to use this platform. Is anyone else experiencing this? And has anyone found a way to actually get Apple to respond? — James | CreateTitan (ZEROCAUGE PRO)

can someone please help with the review ? Hi everyone, I submitted my app ZEROCAUGE PRO on April 21st. It has been 16 days and the status is still "Waiting for Review." This is impacting real users and a live business. Paying coaches and athletes are waiting daily to use this platform. Is anyone else experiencing this? And has anyone found a way to actually get Apple to respond? — James | CreateTitan (ZEROCAUGE PRO)

This crash has been troubling us for a long time. We have this crash report in every release of our App, but can't reproduce it. Here is part of the crash info: Incident Identifier: xxxx Hardware Model: iPhone13,3 Process: MyApp [34550] Path: /private/var/containers/Bundle/Application/xxxx/MyApp.app/MyApp Identifier: xxx.xxx Version: xxx (296) AppStoreTools: 15F31c AppVariant: 1:iPhone13,3:15 Code Type: ARM-64 (Native) Role: Foreground Parent Process: launchd [1] Coalition: xxx.xxx [466] Date/Time: 2024-05-19 13:59:10.9716 +0800 Launch Time: 2024-05-19 12:18:24.8753 +0800 OS Version: iPhone OS 16.6.1 (20G81) Release Type: User Baseband Version: 3.80.01 Report Version: 104 Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV) Exception Subtype: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x322e323400000000 -> 0x0000003400000000 (possible pointer authentication failure) Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000001, 0x322e323400000000 VM Region Info: 0x3400000000 is in 0x1000000000-0x7000000000; bytes after start: 154618822656 bytes before end: 257698037759 REGION TYPE START - END [ VSIZE] PRT/MAX SHRMOD REGION DETAIL commpage (reserved) fc0000000-1000000000 [ 1.0G] ---/--- SM=NUL ...(unallocated) ---> GPU Carveout (reserved) 1000000000-7000000000 [384.0G] ---/--- SM=NUL ...(unallocated) UNUSED SPACE AT END Triggered by Thread: 0 Thread 0 name: Thread 0 Crashed: 0 CoreGraphics 0x00000001bd1d0780 CGFontStrikeRelease + 76 (CGFontStrike.c:126) 1 CoreGraphics 0x00000001bd1dd0cc CGGlyphBuilderUnlockBitmaps + 476 (CGGlyphBuilder.cc:113) 2 CoreGraphics 0x00000001bd1eb8c8 render_glyphs + 412 (RIPContextDrawGlyphs.c:127) 3 CoreGraphics 0x00000001bd202ea4 draw_glyph_bitmaps + 1132 (RIPContextDrawGlyphs.c:210) 4 CoreGraphics 0x00000001bd21a0ec ripc_DrawGlyphs + 1320 (RIPContextDrawGlyphs.c:558) 5 CoreGraphics 0x00000001bd1d26d8 CG::DisplayList::executeEntries(std::__1::__wrap_iter<std::__1::unique_ptr<CG::DisplayListEntry const, std::__1::default_delete<CG::DisplayListEntry const> >*>, std::__1::__wrap_iter<std::__1::uniq... + 5852 (DisplayList.cpp:1657) 6 CoreGraphics 0x00000001bd1c86a8 CGDisplayListDrawInContextDelegate + 268 (DisplayList.cpp:2151) 7 QuartzCore 0x00000001bcc797d4 CABackingStoreUpdate_ + 468 (CABackingStore.cpp:1388) 8 QuartzCore 0x00000001bccf0c34 invocation function for block in CA::Layer::display_() + 64 (CALayer.mm:9699) 9 QuartzCore 0x00000001bcc78d54 -[CALayer _display] + 1720 (CALayer.mm:9732) 10 QuartzCore 0x00000001bcc785b4 CA::Layer::layout_and_display_if_needed(CA::Transaction*) + 412 (CALayer.mm:2521) 11 QuartzCore 0x00000001bcc898d8 CA::Context::commit_transaction(CA::Transaction*, double, double*) + 444 (CAContextInternal.mm:2714) 12 QuartzCore 0x00000001bccb8e80 CA::Transaction::commit() + 648 (CATransactionInternal.mm:432) 13 QuartzCore 0x00000001bcca2df0 CA::Transaction::flush_as_runloop_observer(bool) + 88 (CATransactionInternal.mm:940) 14 UIKitCore 0x00000001bdca34d0 _UIApplicationFlushCATransaction + 52 (UIApplication.m:3286) 15 UIKitCore 0x00000001bddf3d94 _UIUpdateSequenceRun + 84 (_UIUpdateSequence.mm:114) 16 UIKitCore 0x00000001be458894 schedulerStepScheduledMainSection + 144 (_UIUpdateScheduler.m:1015) 17 UIKitCore 0x00000001be457df0 runloopSourceCallback + 92 (_UIUpdateScheduler.m:1164) 18 CoreFoundation 0x00000001bb80a128 __CFRUNLOOP_IS_CALLING_OUT_TO_A_SOURCE0_PERFORM_FUNCTION__ + 28 (CFRunLoop.c:1957) 19 CoreFoundation 0x00000001bb8167b4 __CFRunLoopDoSource0 + 176 (CFRunLoop.c:2001) 20 CoreFoundation 0x00000001bb79b5e8 __CFRunLoopDoSources0 + 244 (CFRunLoop.c:2038) 21 CoreFoundation 0x00000001bb7b10d4 __CFRunLoopRun + 828 (CFRunLoop.c:2953) 22 CoreFoundation 0x00000001bb7b63ec CFRunLoopRunSpecific + 612 (CFRunLoop.c:3418) 23 GraphicsServices 0x00000001f6ccc35c GSEventRunModal + 164 (GSEvent.c:2196) 24 UIKitCore 0x00000001bdb42f58 -[UIApplication _run] + 888 (UIApplication.m:3782) 25 UIKitCore 0x00000001bdb42bbc UIApplicationMain + 340 (UIApplication.m:5372) 26 MyApp 0x000000010468f978 main + 80 (main.m:15) 27 dyld 0x00000001dace8dec start + 2220 (dyldMain.cpp:1165) Thread 1 name: Thread 1: 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x00000001fa6f6ca4 mach_msg2_trap + 8 (:-1) 1 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x00000001fa709b74 mach_msg2_internal + 80 (mach_msg.c:201) 2 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x00000001fa709e4c mach_msg_overwrite + 540 (mach_msg.c:0) 3 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x00000001fa6f71e8 mach_msg + 24 (mach_msg.c:323) 4 CoreFoundation 0x00000001bb7b0024 __CFRunLoopServiceMachPort + 160 (CFRunLoop.c:2622) 5 CoreFoundation 0x00000001bb7b1250 __CFRunLoopRun + 1208 (CFRunLoop.c:3005) 6 CoreFoundation 0x00000001bb7b63ec CFRunLoopRunSpecific + 612 (CFRunLoop.c:3418) 7 Foundation 0x00000001b5a2efb4 -[NSRunLoop(NSRunLoop) runMode:beforeDate:] + 212 (NSRunLoop.m:373) 8 Foundation 0x00000001b5a2ee9c -[NSRunLoop(NSRunLoop) runUntilDate:] + 64 (NSRunLoop.m:420) 9 UIKitCore 0x00000001bdc75cc8 -[UIEventFetcher threadMain] + 416 (UIEventFetcher.m:1376) 10 Foundation 0x00000001b5a48524 __NSThread__start__ + 716 (NSThread.m:963) 11 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x000000021b5766b8 _pthread_start + 148 (pthread.c:893) 12 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x000000021b575b88 thread_start + 8 (:-1) Thread 2: 0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x00000001fa6f7164 __semwait_signal + 8 (:-1) 1 libsystem_c.dylib 0x00000001c2c50888 nanosleep + 220 (nanosleep.c:104) 2 libsystem_c.dylib 0x00000001c2c61b1c sleep + 52 (sleep.c:62) 3 MyApp 0x00000001075ccb14 -[UTDCacheManager synchronizeData] + 104 (UTDCacheManager.m:133) 4 Foundation 0x00000001b5a48524 __NSThread__start__ + 716 (NSThread.m:963) 5 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x000000021b5766b8 _pthread_start + 148 (pthread.c:893) 6 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x000000021b575b88 thread_start + 8 (:-1)

Ever since virtualization changed when Apple transitioned to their own Apple silicon chips, I’m curious whether there is anyway to make virtual machines read the host battery? Asking this because VMs in general always assuming it’s on AC adapter makes battery drain a lot faster it seems like so I’m curious whether adding it or some workaround to add battery reporting w/ power efficiency is possible to match with VMs is possible on Apple Silicon so users on Apple silicon MacBooks don’t have to worry about huge battery power consumption drain with adding some sort of feature or pass through to make VMs read host battery. Hope this makes sense.

I recently submitted both a new app release and an update, and I have to say the review speed has been really satisfying. I also had to use the expedited review process due to unavoidable circumstances, and it seems to be working very quickly and smoothly. Thank you to the App Review team. I really appreciate your hard work.

Hello,our App (appleId: 6761799912) has stuck in review process since 7 days age, I have tried resubmit it for few times, please check the status of our App, thank you